Home > Reports

Nearly 500,000 Immigrants Go Through ICE’s Alternatives to Detention System in Two Years

Published Oct 20, 2022

According to new data obtained by TRAC through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, 480,301 people have been enrolled in ICE’s electronic monitoring program known as Alternatives to Detention (ATD) between August 2020 and June 2022. Many of these individuals, about 196,000, were previously active in ATD but have since ceased to be monitored under ATD, while 284,000 immigrants were still in ATD as of the end of June.

TRAC recently announced that the current total ATD population stands at over 316,000 and TRAC recently analyzed the growth of ATD during the first year of the Biden administration by looking at nationality, gender, and technology type. Missing from these data, however, was an understanding of the total number of immigrants included in ATD over time, as well as the inflow and outflow each month, since the total amount of growth does not account for turnover within the program.

By looking at the total number of people added to and removed from ATD, the public can have a better picture of the total number of people impacted by electronic monitoring. During the final months of the Trump administration, the number of people leaving ATD was larger than the number entering ATD, leading to a slight overall decline in the fall of 2020. Starting in February 2021, however, the number of people entering and leaving the program began to grow considerably.

figure1
Figure 1. Alternatives to Detention Population (Enrolled & Removed)

For instance, by the end of July 2021, the total ATD population reached 113,000, up nearly 7,000 from the end of June 2021. But this net increase of 6,718 is actually a result of ICE terminating 6,000 people from the program and enrolling 12,718 new people. The volume of turnover continued to increase in 2022. In May 2022, the largest number of new people—54,203 in a single month—were added to ATD even as 23,877 people were removed from monitoring under the program.

Immigrants have spent shorter and shorter time on ATD—about 200 days on average in 2022 down from 700 days on average at the start of the Biden administration. The rapid growth of ATD would likely have been even greater had ICE not also removed so many people from ATD monitoring. There are many reasons why people may be removed or terminated from ATD, including if they obtain temporary or permanent legal status, if they leave the country or are deported, if they are detained, or if ICE decides that ATD is no longer appropriate for the individual or family.[1] See Table 1.

Table 1. Alternatives to Detention (ATD) Population Inflow, Outflow, and Duration (in days), August 2020 - June 2022
Month Year Removed from ATD Enrolled in ATD Net Gain/Loss Total ATD Population Average Days on ATD for People Removed This Month
August 2020 1,583 855 -728 87,356 567
September 2020 1,719 998 -721 86,635 589
October 2020 1,530 1,402 -128 86,507 635
November 2020 1,262 1,700 438 86,945 620
December 2020 1,299 2,090 791 87,736 617
January 2021 1,252 2,226 974 88,710 700
February 2021 1,131 2,672 1,541 90,251 674
March 2021 2,469 5,840 3,371 93,622 636
April 2021 3,290 6,068 2,778 96,400 694
May 2021 3,190 7,285 4,095 100,495 741
June 2021 4,138 10,059 5,921 106,416 630
July 2021 6,000 12,718 6,718 113,134 480
August 2021 6,157 18,949 12,792 125,926 532
September 2021 8,949 16,873 7,924 133,850 455
October 2021 8,751 12,909 4,158 138,008 351
November 2021 7,845 14,510 6,665 144,673 345
December 2021 9,065 22,506 13,441 158,114 313
January 2022 11,049 31,113 20,064 178,178 243
February 2022 14,321 28,573 14,252 192,430 184
March 2022 24,414 40,811 16,397 208,827 180
April 2022 22,197 48,088 25,891 234,718 206
May 2022 23,877 54,203 30,326 265,044 209
June 2022 30,793 49,769 18,976 284,020 182

TRAC previously reported that the growth in ATD between December 2020 and December 2021 was driven by large numbers of new Honduran, Venezuelan, Nicaraguan, Brazilian, and other nationalities entering the program, likely driven by conditions in sending countries and reflected in Border Patrol arrests at the US-Mexico border. These new data show how quickly these data can shift in a short period of time.

Between December 2021 and June 2022, the total ATD population nearly doubled from 158,000 to 284,000. The number of Guatemalans, Mexicans, and Hondurans—which made up a very large proportion of ICE’s ATD population at the start of the Biden administration, declined in relative and absolute numbers. In contrast, the number of Cubans, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans, Colombians, and Peruvians grew dramatically. People from Cuban now made up 22 percent of ICE’s total ATD numbers, Nicaraguans made up 16 percent, and Venezuelans made up another 10 percent. See Table 2.

Table 2. Alternatives to Detention (ATD) Population by Nationality (Top 25 Only)
Nationality December 2020* December 2021* June 2022
Guatemala 24,356 23,189 20,309
Honduras 14,771 22,693 20,632
Mexico 18,131 16,467 13,966
Venezuela 608 15,884 29,289
Nicaragua 833 14,846 45,245
El Salvador 12,191 13,567 12,452
Brazil 2,170 11,643 12,693
Haiti 2,677 9,029 9,725
Cuba 1,813 8,118 62,003
Ecuador 596 7,341 8,638
Colombia 204 2,365 19,489
India 1,522 1,852 4,765
Peru 233 1,115 7,840
Turkey 88 888 2,793
Russia 345 816 1,870
Romania 292 723 943
China 944 605 660
Cameroon 485 468 572
Armenia 322 417 403
Ukraine 172 270 554
Uzbekistan 110 259 593
Dominican Republic 112 242 604
Ghana 166 228 460
Jamaica 177 227 649
Vietnam 298 226 207
All Other 2,932 3,679 6,666
Grand Total* 86,548 157,157 284,020
* Totals in this table for December 2020 and December 2021 are from ICE's previous responses to FOIA requests, which were the basis for TRAC's last report covering ATD nationality. The data in this report is from June 2022, and because this data comes from an active database, numbers can shift slightly due to the additions of late recording and error corrections impacting prior periods. Therefore, there is a difference between the totals for December 2020 and December 2021 in Table 2 compared to Table 1, but these small differences are expected given the original sources used by ICE.

As the following three graphs show, there are considerable differences between nationalities on ATD even from the same regions, again likely influenced by border policies such as Title 42, although other factors may contribute to who ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) decides to monitor.

Among immigrants from Mexico and Central America, only Nicaraguans have seen recent growth. The number of Venezuelans and Colombians in ATD continues to grow, while the number of Brazilians and Ecuadorians leveled off in 2022. Cubans, many of whom have been allowed into the United States recently, are now on electronic monitoring, while Haitians, many of whom have been turned away or deported, on the other hand, do not constitute a particularly large group.

figure2
Figure 2. ATD Population by Nationality: Mexico and Central America
figure3
Figure 3. ATD Population by Nationality: South America
figure4
Figure 4. ATD Population by Nationality: Caribbean
Footnotes
[1]^A 2019 report by the Congressional Research Service described the reasons why ICE may remove a person from Alternatives to Detention: “Enrollees were terminated from the program when they were removed, returned, or receive some form of immigration relief. In addition, they were terminated if they were arrested by another law enforcement entity, absconded, or otherwise violated the terms of the program. In 2011, ICE recommended that ERO field offices cut costs by terminating participants who were not high priority (those new to the program or those with a final order of removal).”
TRAC is a nonpartisan, nonprofit data research center affiliated with the Newhouse School of Public Communications and the Whitman School of Management, both at Syracuse University. For more information, to subscribe, or to donate, contact trac@syr.edu or call 315-443-3563.