Home > Reports

Immigrants Monitored by ICE’s Alternatives to Detention Program Vary by Nationality, Gender, and State

Published Oct 11, 2022

During the first year of the Biden administration, ICE’s Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program grew rapidly from 86,548 at the end of December 2020 to 157,157 at the end of December 2021, attracting public interest and demonstrating the centrality of ATD to the Biden administration’s approach to immigration control. Despite these large—and growing—numbers made public by ICE through bi-weekly disclosures on its detention website, the public has seen little data about who has been enrolled in ATD.

In this report, TRAC examines the growth of ATD during the first year of the Biden administration using detailed data obtained from ICE through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. These data on ICE’s ATD program are not the most current. As TRAC recently announced, by the end of September 2022 the number of people in ATD exceeded 300,000 for the first time. Nonetheless, the data in this report provide a far more detailed picture than ICE’s regular ATD releases.

ATD Growth by Nationality

The nationalities represented in ICE’s ATD program diversified considerably in the first year of the Biden administration. At the end of December 2020, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and El Salvador—four countries highly represented in immigration enforcement data—constituted fully 80 percent of all people in ATD. A year later, these four countries dropped to less than half (48 percent) of all people in ATD. Only Hondurans showed an increase (and a significant one, from 14,771 to 22,693), while the number of Guatemalans, Mexicans and Salvadorans actually declined in absolute numbers.

Instead, the growth in ATD numbers were driven by ICE’s enrollment of many more nationalities into its ATD program, including Hondurans, Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, Cubans, Brazilians, Haitians, and many other nationalities which saw very considerable growth. The number of Venezuelans in ATD, in particular, increased 26 fold over that year, from 608 to 15,884, while Nicaraguans, not far behind, grew to 17 times their original numbers (from 833 to 14,846) over the same period. The number of Brazilian’s grew from 2,170 to 11,643, Ecuadorians grew from 596 to 7,341, and Colombians grew from just 204 to 2,365. See Figure 1.

figure1
Figure 1. Number of People in ATD by Nationality

ATD Growth by Nationality and Technology Type

ICE’s ATD program—also known as ISAP or the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program—is managed by a private contractor, BI, Inc. BI currently relies on three electronic monitoring technologies: GPS ankle monitors, TR (telephonic reporting), and SmartLINK. GPS ankle monitors are devices worn by noncitizens that rely on global position systems (GPS) to track location. Telephonic reporting requires immigrants to check-in at specific intervals over the phone using voice matching technology to confirm identity. SmartLINK, the newest of the three, is a smartphone application that relies on facial recognition and other technologies to confirm the identity and location of people enrolled in ATD. Although debates about electronic monitoring are ongoing, GPS ankle monitors are typically considered to be the most intensive form of monitoring.

As TRAC has pointed out in the past[1], ICE’s data show an overall trend away from using both GPS ankle monitors and telephonic reporting, and towards using the smartphone app SmartLINK. In December 2020, ICE used each technology in approximately even proportions, with GPS used in 32 percent of cases, TR in 30 percent of cases, and SmartLINK in 35 percent of cases. A year later at the end of December 2021, these numbers shifted dramatically: GPS was used in just 19 percent of cases, TR in 16 percent of cases, and SmartLINK in 63 percent of cases.[2]

These data, previously released to the public by ICE, are not new (see TRAC’s interactive ATD table here). What is new, however, are data that show variations among who is assigned to each technology based on nationality and gender. ICE’s move towards SmartLINK affected nearly all groups, regardless of gender or nationality, but some groups saw more benefit than others.

Guatemalan and Mexican nationals saw considerable drops in GPS usage, from 29 and 28 percent of cases respectively down to just 9 percent each. Most other nationalities saw a significant but less pronounced decline in the relative use of GPS ankle monitors: just 26 percent of Haitians in ATD were on ankle monitors compared to 68 percent the year before and among Cubans just 30 percent were on ankle monitors compared to 67 percent.

Other groups saw much less proportional decline. The rate at which Nicaraguans were put on ATD nearly kept pace with massive growth in Nicaraguans overall: 36 percent of the 14,846 Nicaraguans on ATD at the end of 2021 were on ankle monitors, down slightly from 42 percent the year before but only 833 were in the program at that time. A similar pattern emerged for Colombians, who saw a decline from 39 to 34 percent on GPS, but amid over ten-fold growth from 204 to 2,365.

Among the 25 most frequent nationalities that TRAC examined, only Turkish nationals saw an increase in GPS ankle monitor usage, from 27 percent to 46 percent over the year in question, as they, too, increased ten-fold from 88 to 888. See Table 1.

Table 1. ATD Enrollment by Nationality and Electronic Monitoring Type, December 2020 and December 2021.
December 2020 December 2021
Nationality GPS SmartLink TR Blank Total Nationality GPS SmartLink TR Blank Total
Guatemala 7,178 7,775 8,922 481 24,356 Guatemala 2,152 13,777 7,087 173 23,189
Honduras 4,647 4,846 4,890 388 14,771 Honduras 3,252 15,023 4,168 250 22,693
Mexico 5,077 5,627 7,126 301 18,131 Mexico 1,512 9,165 5,724 66 16,467
Venezuela 336 203 60 9 608 Venezuela 4,226 10,747 457 454 15,884
Nicaragua 348 220 245 20 833 Nicaragua 5,361 8,123 557 805 14,846
El Salvador 2,779 3,020 6,185 207 12,191 El Salvador 1,530 7,194 4,717 126 13,567
Brazil 672 1,105 363 30 2,170 Brazil 3,111 8,088 324 120 11,643
Haiti 1,812 624 188 53 2,677 Haiti 2,319 6,476 192 42 9,029
Cuba 1,222 437 131 23 1,813 Cuba 2,459 4,993 476 190 8,118
Ecuador 252 175 156 13 596 Ecuador 805 6,347 153 36 7,341
Colombia 79 64 55 6 204 Colombia 807 1,422 68 68 2,365
India 627 500 384 11 1,522 India 357 1,186 296 13 1,852
Peru 65 68 95 5 233 Peru 237 773 89 16 1,115
Turkey 24 46 18 0 88 Turkey 405 445 17 21 888
Russia 144 98 99 4 345 Russia 155 539 110 12 816
Romania 145 34 109 4 292 Romania 200 385 130 8 723
China 660 128 153 3 944 China 198 248 157 2 605
Cameroon 235 142 91 17 485 Cameroon 31 356 78 3 468
Armenia 64 20 236 2 322 Armenia 56 140 220 1 417
Ukraine 47 73 52 0 172 Ukraine 21 209 37 3 270
Uzbekistan 41 30 39 0 110 Uzbekistan 62 164 20 13 259
Dominican Republic 61 28 23 0 112 Dominican Republic 89 128 24 1 242
Ghana 83 55 26 2 166 Ghana 41 170 17 0 228
Jamaica 94 33 46 4 177 Jamaica 78 111 37 1 227
Vietnam 132 85 80 1 298 Vietnam 40 110 76 0 226
All other 1,225 845 835 27 2,932 All other 894 2,076 683 26 3,679
Grand Total 28,049 26,281 30,607 1,611 86,548 Grand Total 30,398 98,395 25,914 2,450 157,157

ATD Growth by Gender and Technology Type

In addition to nationality, gender also appeared to play a role in overall growth as well as the growth in who was placed on each type of monitoring technology.

At the end of 2020, ICE's total ATD population was composed of slightly more women (51 percent) than men (49 percent). However, by the end of the first calendar year of the Biden administration, men made up 54 percent and women made up 46 percent of people monitored by ICE. Most nationalities were relatively evenly split by gender recorded by ICE, although some exceptions stood out. At the end of 2021, Brazilians in ATD, for instance, tended to be more male (8,471 or 73 percent), while Salvadorans tended to be more female (9,083 or 67 percent).

Women tended to be assigned to less restrictive forms of monitoring, including TR and SmartLINK, rather than GPS ankle monitors. In December 2020, just 21 percent of women were on ankle monitors compared to 45 percent for men, and 67 percent for immigrants identified as intersex in ICE’s data. ICE also used TR for 44 percent women but just 26 percent for men and 10 percent of intersex immigrants.

By December 2021, consistent with the overall trend towards SmartLINK, the percent of women and men on GPS both dropped to half their previous number. Just 11 percent of women and 26 percent of men were on GPS, while intersex immigrants saw the greatest change: GPS usage dropped to just 7 percent of those cases.[3] See table 2. To put it differently, when looking specifically at those migrants who remained on GPS ankle monitors at the end of 2021, nearly three-quarters were identified as male and just one-quarter were identified as female, while for telephonic reporting, 61 percent of people were female and 39 percent were male. See Figure 2.

It is unclear from the data alone how much the gender and nationality compositions of ATD reflect the underlying composition of arriving immigrants compared to the decision making processes about who is added to ATD and on which technology.

figure2
Figure 2. Percent of People on Each ATD Technology by Gender, 12/31/2021
Table 2. ATD Enrollment by Gender and Electronic Monitoring Type, December 2020 and December 2021.
December 2020 December 2021
GPS SmartLink TR Blank Total GPS SmartLink TR Blank Total
Male 18,833 11,849 11,037 349 42,068 Male 22,081 51,329 10,072 1,430 84,912
Female 9,200 14,428 19,565 1,260 44,453 Female 8,271 46,995 15,837 1,020 72,123
Intersex 14 4 2 1 21 Intersex 1 11 3 0 15
Unknown 2 0 3 1 6 Unknown 45 60 2 0 107
Total 28,049 26,281 30,607 1,611 86,548 Total 30,398 98,395 25,914 2,450 157,157

ATD Growth by State

ICE’s previous ATD data releases included enrollments by Area of Responsibility (AOR), which provided some geographic information; but AORs can span several states and some states have more than one AOR. However, ICE’s detailed data include information about the city and state for each anonymized case, which allows for a more detailed look at state-by-state ATD numbers.

Notably, while California traditionally has had by far the most immigrants monitored on ATD, Texas ended 2021 with the most people monitored. During a year when total ATD enrollments slightly less-than-doubled, the number of people monitored by ICE in Texas grew six-fold from 5,681 to 33,902. Massachusetts and Arizona also grew over six-fold in the same year, more than Texas, but in terms of absolute magnitude, Texas jumped ahead of California and New Jersey in terms of total ATD enrollments.

Table 3. ATD Enrollment by State, December 2020 and December 2021.
State 12/31/2020 12/31/2021
Texas 5,681 33,902
California 23,404 29,044
New Jersey 7,001 12,209
Florida 5,486 11,039
New York 4,075 7,027
Arizona 1,051 6,434
Massachusetts 619 4,259
Ohio 4,147 4,257
Michigan 3,609 4,204
Washington 2,677 3,843
Illinois 2,545 3,584
Virginia 2,069 3,135
Colorado 1,347 2,706
Pennsylvania 1,412 2,625
Georgia 1,754 2,469
Maryland 2,653 2,284
Utah 1,207 2,083
Missouri 1,454 1,855
Indiana 1,359 1,796
District of Columbia 708 1,752
Minnesota 1,227 1,682
Nevada 1,445 1,572
Connecticut 698 1,358
Oregon 1,115 1,260
North Carolina 451 1,212
Kentucky 649 1,094
Louisiana 880 1,091
South Carolina 560 973
Tennessee 613 940
Nebraska 802 909
Delaware 644 859
Alabama 691 789
Wisconsin 448 567
Idaho 329 414
Arkansas 185 300
Rhode Island 111 267
New Mexico 226 223
Oklahoma 269 197
Mississippi 380 195
Kansas 90 161
Iowa 147 154
Hawaii 123 149
South Dakota 31 92
Wyoming 73 75
Maine 56 38
Guam 6 25
Montana 16 20
Alaska 15 19
New Hampshire 7 12
Vermont 3 3
Total 86,548 157,157

ATD Growth in Context

Although these numbers represent a shift in terms of who is monitored by ICE’s ATD program, the shift is not necessarily surprising given the context of who is being arrested at the border by Border Patrol (BP) officers. TRAC’s recent data on BP arrests (through July 2022) show a similar increase in arrests at the border of Venezuelans, Brazilians, Cubans, and others between FY 2020 and 2021. Many of these immigrants who are lawfully seeking asylum have been permitted to enter the country and monitored by ICE using ATD technology while they pursue their asylum claims.

Although ICE emphasizes that ATD is not a true alternative to detention,[4] the Biden administration’s growing ATD numbers stand in contrast to the relatively static detention numbers, which have hovered between 20,000 and 25,000 for most of the Biden administration so far (see TRAC’s detention data table here). This does not mean that detention numbers can’t or won’t increase alongside an increase in ATD enrollments—they can. But it means that, for now, the Biden administration is relying heavily on electronic monitoring as part of the administration’s posture on immigration enforcement policy.

Footnotes
[2]^ Note that there were a very small number of blank or empty entries which did not affect these percentages given their infrequent occurrence.
[3]^ Note that due to small numbers of blank or empty data, the percentages will add up to 100 percent.
[4]^ On its detention website, ICE states that the “ATD program … is not a substitute for detention, but allows ICE to exercise increased supervision over a portion of those who are not detained.”
TRAC is a nonpartisan, nonprofit data research center affiliated with the Newhouse School of Public Communications and the Whitman School of Management, both at Syracuse University. For more information, to subscribe, or to donate, contact trac@syr.edu or call 315-443-3563.