Published Oct 19, 2023
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Mindy E. Hoeppner to begin hearing cases in February2018. Judge Hoeppner earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 1992 and a Juris Doctor in 1995,both from the University of Iowa. From 2015 to 2017, she served as assistant chief counsel forthe Office of Chief Counsel (OCC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Departmentof Homeland Security (DHS), in Las Vegas. From 2005 to 2015, she served as assistant chiefcounsel for OCC, ICE, DHS, in Salt Lake City. From 2004 to 2005, she was an immigrationdefense attorney for the Law Firm of Mindy E. Hoeppner P.C., in Parker, Colo. From 2002 to2004, she was an immigration defense attorney for Lichter & Associates P.C., in Denver. JudgeHoeppner is a member of the Colorado State Bar.
Detailed data on decisions by Judge Hoeppner were examined for the period covering fiscal years 2018 through 2023. During this period, court records show that Judge Hoeppner decided 657 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, she granted asylum for 136, granted 8 other types of relief, and denied relief to 513. Converted to percentage terms, Hoeppner denied 78.1 percent and granted 21.9 percent of asylum cases (including forms of relief other than asylum).
Figure 1 provides a comparison of Judge Hoeppner's denial rate each fiscal year over this recent period. (Rates for years with less than 25 decisions are not shown.)
Compared to Judge Hoeppner's denial rate of 78.1 percent, Immigration Court judges across the country denied 60.6 percent of asylum claims during this same period. Judges at the Portland Immigration Court where Judge Hoeppner decided these cases denied asylum 73.3 percent of the time. See Figure 2.
Judge Hoeppner's asylum grant and denial rates are compared with other judges serving on the same court in this table. Note that when an Immigration Judge serves on more than one court during the same period, separate Immigration Judge reports are created for any Court in which the judge rendered at least 100 asylum decisions.
Although denial rates are shaped by each Judge's judicial philosophy, denial rates are also shaped by other factors, such as the types of cases on the Judge's docket, the detained status of immigrant respondents, current immigration policies, and other factors beyond an individual Judge's control. For example, TRAC has previously found that legal representation and the nationality of the asylum seeker are just two factors that appear to impact asylum decision outcomes.
The composition of cases may differ significantly between Immigration Courts in the country. Within a single Court when cases are randomly assigned to judges sitting on that Court, each Judge should have roughly a similar composition of cases given a sufficient number of asylum cases. Then variations in asylum decisions among Judges on the same Immigration Court would appear to reflect, at least in part, the judicial philosophy that the Judge brings to the bench. However, if judges within a Court are assigned to specialized dockets or hearing locations, then case compositions are likely to continue to differ and can contribute to differences in asylum denial rates.
When asylum seekers are not represented by an attorney, almost all of them (80%) are denied asylum. In contrast, a significantly higher proportion of represented asylum seekers are successful. In the case of Judge Hoeppner, 19% were not represented by an attorney. See Figure 3. For the nation as a whole, about 15.7% of asylum seekers are not represented.
Asylum seekers are a diverse group. Over one hundred different nationalities had at least one hundred individuals claiming asylum decided during this period. As might be expected, immigration courts located in different parts of the country tend to have proportionately larger shares from some countries than from others. And, given the required legal grounds for a successful asylum claim, asylum seekers from some nations tend to be more successful than others.
The largest group of asylum seekers appearing before Judge Hoeppner came from Mexico. Individuals from this country made up 48.4% of her caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Hoeppner were: Guatemala (28.0%), El Salvador (5.9%), India (5.2%), Honduras (3.5%). See Figure 4.
In the nation as a whole during this same period, major nationalities of asylum seekers, in descending order of frequency, were El Salvador (16.6%), Guatemala (15.1%), Honduras (13.8%), Mexico (9.2%), China (6.8%), India (5.1%), Venezuela (3.2%), Ecuador (3.1%), Cuba (2.4%), Nicaragua (2.3%), Brazil (2.0%), Colombia (1.4%), Cameroon (1.4%).