Judge Richard Bailey

FY 2019 - 2024, Newark Immigration Court

Published Nov 7, 2024

Richard J. Bailey was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in December 2022. Judge Bailey earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2005 from Fordham University and a Juris Doctor in 2012 from the City University of New York School of Law. From 2014 to 2022, he was a staff attorney and then a supervising attorney at Brooklyn Defender Services in New York where he represented individuals before EOIR; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security; and the U.S. District Courts. From 2012 to 2014, he served as a staff attorney at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Judge Bailey is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and the New York State Bar.

Deciding Asylum Cases

Detailed data on decisions by Judge Bailey were examined for the period covering fiscal years 2019 through 2024. During this period, court records show that Judge Bailey decided 554 asylum claims on their merits. Of these, he granted asylum for 132, granted 6 other types of relief, and denied relief to 416. Converted to percentage terms, Bailey denied 75.1 percent and granted 24.9 percent of asylum cases (including forms of relief other than asylum).

Figure 1 provides a comparison of Judge Bailey's denial rate each fiscal year over this recent period. (Rates for years with less than 25 decisions are not shown.)

Nationwide Comparisons

Compared to Judge Bailey's denial rate of 75.1 percent, Immigration Court judges across the country denied 57.7 percent of asylum claims during this same period. Judges at the Newark Immigration Court where Judge Bailey decided these cases denied asylum 67 percent of the time. See Figure 2.

Judge Bailey's asylum grant and denial rates are compared with other judges serving on the same court in this table. Note that when an Immigration Judge serves on more than one court during the same period, separate Immigration Judge reports are created for any Court in which the judge rendered at least 100 asylum decisions.

Why Do Denial Rates Vary Among Judges?

Although denial rates are shaped by each Judge's judicial philosophy, denial rates are also shaped by other factors, such as the types of cases on the Judge's docket, the detained status of immigrant respondents, current immigration policies, and other factors beyond an individual Judge's control. For example, TRAC has previously found that legal representation and the nationality of the asylum seeker are just two factors that appear to impact asylum decision outcomes.

The composition of cases may differ significantly between Immigration Courts in the country. Within a single Court when cases are randomly assigned to judges sitting on that Court, each Judge should have roughly a similar composition of cases given a sufficient number of asylum cases. Then variations in asylum decisions among Judges on the same Immigration Court would appear to reflect, at least in part, the judicial philosophy that the Judge brings to the bench. However, if judges within a Court are assigned to specialized dockets or hearing locations, then case compositions are likely to continue to differ and can contribute to differences in asylum denial rates.

Representation

When asylum seekers are not represented by an attorney, almost all of them (77%) are denied asylum. In contrast, a significantly higher proportion of represented asylum seekers are successful. In the case of Judge Bailey, 18.8% were not represented by an attorney. See Figure 3. For the nation as a whole, about 16.4% of asylum seekers are not represented.

Nationality

Asylum seekers are a diverse group. Over one hundred different nationalities had at least one hundred individuals claiming asylum decided during this period. As might be expected, immigration courts located in different parts of the country tend to have proportionately larger shares from some countries than from others. And, given the required legal grounds for a successful asylum claim, asylum seekers from some nations tend to be more successful than others.

The largest group of asylum seekers appearing before Judge Bailey came from Ecuador. Individuals from this country made up 37.9% of his caseload. Other nationalities in descending order of frequency appearing before Judge Bailey were: Brazil (37.5%), Honduras (7.9%), Guatemala (6.7%), Colombia (2.9%). See Figure 4.

In the nation as a whole during this same period, major nationalities of asylum seekers, in descending order of frequency, were El Salvador (14.0%), Guatemala (13.2%), Honduras (12.4%), Mexico (8.2%), China (6.1%), India (5.4%), Venezuela (4.0%), Ecuador (3.7%), Nicaragua (3.5%), Colombia (2.9%), Cuba (2.6%), Brazil (2.6%), Russia (2.4%).