DHS Fails to File Paperwork Leading to Large Numbers of Dismissals
(29 Jul 2022) One out of every six new cases DHS initiates in Immigration Court are now being dismissed because CBP officials are not filing the actual "Notice to Appear" (NTA) with the Court. The latest case-by-case Court records obtained and analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University through a series of Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests show a dramatic increase in these cases.

As of June 2022, there are some Courts where the majority of all case completions are these dismissals for failing to file the NTA. Leading the list in terms of the number of these NTA closures is the Dedicated Docket hearing location in Miami. Fully 7,700 out of the total of 9,492 case completions during FY 2022 — or 81 percent — were dismissals because the Court had not received the NTA.

While it would appear that a policy which tries to accelerate the scheduling and hearing of cases puts additional pressure on DHS to promptly file the NTA with the Court, other Dedicated Docket locations have below average dismissal rates.

Further, some regular hearing locations have also been experiencing high dismissal rates because of DHS's failure to file NTAs. These include Houston with 54 percent, Miami with 43 percent, and Chicago with 26 percent.

Ten years ago this failure to file a NTA was rare. However, the frequency increased once Border Patrol agents were given the ability to use the Immigration Court's Interactive Scheduling System (ISS). Using ISS, the agents can directly schedule the initial hearing (i.e. a master calendar hearing) at the Immigration Court. Supposedly, the actual NTA is created at the same time, and a copy given to the asylum seeker or other noncitizen with the scheduled hearing location and time they are to show up in Court noted on the NTA.

Thus, the process only requires that CBP actually follow up with the ministerial task of seeing that the Court also receives a copy of the NTA. With the implementation of the Court's ECAS system of e-filing, this should have made the process quick and straightforward. That this is failing to be done suggests there is a serious disconnect between the CBP agents entering new cases and scheduling hearings through the Court's ISS system, and other CBP personnel responsible for submitting a copy to the Court.

This failure is exceedingly wasteful of the Court's time. It is also problematic for the immigrant (and possibly their attorney) if they show up at hearings only to have the case dismissed by the Immigration Judge because the case hasn't actually been filed with the Court.

For a listing of dismissal rates by hearing location, read the full report at:

If you want to be sure to receive a notification whenever updated data become available, sign up at:

Follow us on Twitter at:

or like us on Facebook:

TRAC is self-supporting and depends on foundation grants, individual contributions and subscription fees for the funding needed to obtain, analyze and publish the data we collect on the activities of the US Federal government. To help support TRAC's ongoing efforts, go to:

Customized queries of TRAC's data TRAC FBI Web Site TRAC DEA Web Site TRAC Immigration Web Site TRAC IRS Web Site TRAC ATF Web Site TRAC Reports Web Site FOIA Project Web Site
Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2022
TRAC What's New TRAC