Official Corruption Prosecutions Have Increased

The latest available data from the Department of Justice show that during the first six months of FY 2021 the government reported 236 new official corruption prosecutions. If this activity continues at the same pace, the annual total of prosecutions will be 472 for this fiscal year. This estimate is up 38 percent over the past fiscal year when the number of prosecutions totaled 342 according to the internal case-by-case government records obtained and analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University after successful litigation under the Freedom of Information Act.

Official corruption prosecutions include bribery, graft, conflicts of interest, and other violations by federal, state, and local officials and law enforcement personnel. These cases brought by federal government attorneys involve the prosecution of governors, judges, federal and state legislators, and other federal, state, and local public officials who have been prosecuted for their criminal actions while in public office. Additional cases include the prosecution of government employees charged with misconduct in public office, including attempts by private citizens to bribe or otherwise corrupt them.


Figure 1. Federal Criminal Prosecutions for Official Corruption, FY 1987 - FY 2021 (October-March)
(Click for larger image)

Why Are Public Corruption Prosecutions Up?

The increase in prosecutions does not necessarily imply that the actual extent of public corruption is on the rise. In fact, there are no reliable figures on the true extent of public corruption across the country. In general, because there are typically so many more offenses for most types of crimes than there are available law enforcement resources, a great deal of discretion is exercised by investigative agencies as well as by federal prosecutors on which matters to investigate and which of these to take to court. Thus, official corruption prosecution trends are believed to largely reflect the relative emphasis placed on these types of cases by investigative agencies and by federal prosecutors at any point in time rather than actual trends in crime rates.

In this case, what we do know is that during the first six months of FY 2021 there has been an increase in investigations that have been referred to and acted upon by federal prosecutors, and a slightly higher proportion of these which resulted in actual charges being filed. Even with this rise, federal prosecutors actually brought charges in less than four out of ten (39%) of the referrals they received from federal, state and local investigative agencies during the first six months of FY 2021. This was still slightly higher than the 35 percent of referrals that resulted in charges being filed during the Trump years.

As shown above in Figure 1, over the last 35 years official corruption cases actually peaked in FY 1998 when records show 906 defendants were prosecuted. Since then, prosecution numbers have generally slowly fallen with only short periods where prosecutions briefly increased.

As TRAC previously reported, during the Trump years, prosecutions reached their lowest levels. The further decrease in prosecutions during FY 2020, of course, was exacerbated by the pandemic. Criminal investigations and prosecutions of all types dropped sharply immediately after the pandemic hit and federal offices closed across the country[1]. However, comparing the pre-pandemic first six months of FY 2020 (October 2019-March 2020) with the same period in FY 2021 (October 2020-March 2021), even though the country was still struggling with the pandemic, federal official corruption prosecutions still saw an increase.

The change so far this fiscal year cannot be attributed to the Biden administration. In fact, the higher filings occurred between October and December 2020-prior to the change in administrations.

Increase in Federal Corruption Prosecutions-not State and Local-Drives Trend

Internal case-by-case information recorded by federal prosecutors and obtained by TRAC provide additional details on the various types of corruption cases that have been brought. For many years, corruption offenses involved federal-level officials and employees greatly outnumbered those for state and local officials. See Figure 2.


Figure 2. Federal Criminal Official Corruption Prosecutions for Federal-Level Versus Local and State-Level Offenses, FY 1987 - FY 2021 (October-March)
(Click for larger image)

However, after federal-type corruption filings peaked in FY 1998, these types of prosecutions fell sharply so that for many years the make-up of cases were roughly evenly split between federal and state-local corruption cases. Then, starting towards the end of the Obama administration and continuing through the Trump administration, both types of corruption cases fell but the drop was less precipitous for state and local corruption matters.

The recent jump in corruption prosecutions during the last six months largely involved federal- level corruption matters, rather than state, local and other individuals. See Appendix Table for detailed figures.

Most Active Judicial Districts Prosecuting Official Corruption

Federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans) filed public corruption charges against the largest number of defendants—a total of 34—in public corruption cases across the nation during the first six month of FY 2021. A total of 31 out of 34 of these defendants were indicted in a single case arising out of an investigation by the Coast Guard Investigative Service involving a "test score-fixing scheme at a United States Coast Guard exam center." According to the indictment, individuals obtained a range of licenses, including for officer-level positions such as master, chief mate, and chief engineer, by paying bribes for falsified exam scores certifying they had passed the required exams.

The number of corruption filings in Eastern Louisiana outnumbered those filed in the District of Columbia where 16 defendants were charged with official corruption offenses. D.C. cases involved investigations by the Defense Department Office of the Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Department of Transportation.

In third and fourth place for the most cases filed, was the Central District of California (Los Angeles) with 13 prosecutions, followed by New Jersey with 12. Three districts were tied for fifth place, each with 9 public corruption defendants charged. These were: the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago), the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn), and the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

Because federal judicial districts vary so widely in population size, to adjust for population differences, the line-up for the top 10 districts with the highest per capita prosecution rates for alleged official corruption offenses is somewhat different. These top ten districts are shown in Table 1. Here the District of Columbia ranks first, followed by the Eastern District of Louisiana.

In third place was the Southern District of Alabama (Mobile) with 6 official corruption prosecutions arising out of a single case investigated by the Small Business Administration for the alleged bribery of public officials. According to the indictment, this case involved false and fraudulent Economic Injury Disaster Loan applications to provide loans to small businesses and nonprofit organizations experiencing substantial financial disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Table 1. Federal Judicial Districts with the Most Criminal Prosecutions of Official Corruption Offenses Relative to Population Size
Judicial District Prosecutions Filed
October 2020 - March 2021
District Ranking:
Rate* Number Ranking 1 Yr Ago 5 Yrs ago 10 Yrs Ago 20 Yrs Ago
D. C. 45.3 16 1 1 3 1 1
La, E 40.4 34 2 28 16 3 18
Ala, S 14.1 6 3 29 44 74 4
Hawaii 5.7 4 4 21 26 48 41
Miss, S 5.4 5 5 2 4 20 2
Wash, E 4.9 4 6 16 57 50 70
Ill, S 4.8 3 7 19 53 6 63
Ill, C 4.6 5 8 51 73 36 70
Maine 4.5 3 9 42 11 74 70
N Mexico 3.8 4 10 13 17 12 31
* per million population
Appendix Table. Federal Criminal Official Corruption Prosecutions for Federal-Level Versus Local and State-Level Offenses, FY 1986 - FY 2021 (October-March)
Fiscal Year Total Federal-Level Offenses Involving: Nonfederal-Level Offenses:
Law Enforcement Procurement Programs Other Local State Other
1986 595 43 95 143 89 116 47 62
1987 622 33 83 130 126 120 33 97
1988 760 68 88 117 198 164 53 72
1989 712 46 96 169 135 146 59 61
1990 682 73 85 145 120 163 49 47
1991 769 59 109 135 209 154 53 50
1992 823 26 89 160 196 133 89 130
1993 716 49 69 154 163 139 77 65
1994 711 42 89 202 117 160 37 64
1995 816 63 112 164 161 197 52 67
1996 738 46 81 154 152 174 79 52
1997 825 56 98 143 180 169 110 69
1998 906 94 96 142 201 186 74 113
1999 824 53 136 128 192 179 91 45
2000 697 34 71 103 171 150 117 51
2001 661 47 71 82 157 177 52 75
2002 731 52 51 122 147 236 55 68
2003 765 48 58 112 175 225 94 53
2004 760 52 73 130 148 208 86 62
2005 661 49 60 77 126 187 53 107
2006 659 75 71 65 140 201 52 55
2007 621 94 51 51 96 170 85 69
2008 675 92 46 46 105 211 111 64
2009 724 67 53 43 237 206 69 49
2010 727 48 36 56 169 222 52 144
2011 585 70 36 97 107 153 56 66
2012 633 53 60 79 113 185 89 54
2013 636 71 82 74 110 181 58 60
2014 524 46 27 65 71 185 63 67
2015 505 82 36 44 91 116 68 68
2016 515 57 30 55 85 116 99 73
2017 485 71 39 32 70 169 57 47
2018 390 38 25 28 76 129 41 53
2019 421 41 23 34 75 128 48 72
2020 342 29 17 32 54 146 29 35
*2021 236 34 9 16 63 52 22 40
* Covers only the first six months from October 2020 - March 2021.

Footnotes

[1] See earlier TRAC reports tracking impact of the federal government office closures on federal enforcement activity through: March 2020, April 2020, June 2020, and August 2020.

TRAC offers free monthly reports on program categories such as white-collar crime, immigration, drugs, weapons and terrorism and on selected government agencies such as the IRS, FBI, ATF and DHS. For the latest information on prosecutions and convictions, go to https://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/bulletins/. In addition, subscribers to the TRACFed data service can generate custom reports for a specific agency, judicial district, program category, lead charge or judge via the TRAC Data Interpreter.