Few Immigration Criminal Prosecutions, While Non-Immigration Prosecutions Rebound

Federal criminal prosecutions nationally have largely returned to the pace that prevailed before the pandemic hit and federal offices closed in mid-March across the country. This is true except for prosecutions for immigration offenses which have not returned to their pre-pandemic levels. See Figure 1. (See Table 1 at the end of the report for month-by-month prosecution counts.)


Figure 1. Federal Immigration vs. Non-Immigration Prosecutions by Month
(Click for larger image)

Two federal agencies within the Department of Homeland Security—Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—are the source of most immigration criminal referrals[1]. As shown in Figure 2A, federal prosecutors continue to receive few referrals from CBP. CBP is largely responsible for arresting immigrants for illegal entry and illegal reentry along the country's border with Mexico and historically has accounted for the most immigration prosecutions. With the pandemic, the Trump Administration has instituted a policy to quickly deport individuals attempting to enter the country illegally in place of detaining them and referring them for criminal prosecution. The decline in immigration referrals from CBP to federal prosecutors, therefore, appears to be driven at least partially by a policy change within the administration that prioritizes deportation over prosecution. As we also see in Figure 2B, thus far criminal referrals from interior enforcement by ICE officials have recovered much—but not all—of the ground they lost during the early months of the pandemic.

Figure 2A-2B. Referrals to Prosecutors
from Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
October 2019 - August 2020

District-by-District Patterns

Non-immigration criminal prosecution levels have largely recovered in most U.S. Attorney offices across the country. These findings are based on analyses of case-by-case Department of Justice records, updated through August 2020, obtained by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University after litigation under the Freedom of Information Act. Once immigration prosecutions are set aside, the volume of federal prosecutions filed in the vast majority of U.S. Attorney offices across the country are now occurring at rates similar to those before the pandemic hit and the closure in mid-March of federal offices.

However, not every location has recovered. Prosecution levels, for example, have not fully rebounded in the Southern District of New York (Manhattan). See Figure 3A. Nor in the Southern District of Florida. See Figure 3B. The Southern District of Texas (Houston) and the Northern District of California (San Francisco) have also not fully rebounded. But while these districts are home to large metropolitan areas, other big-city districts such as the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) have largely recovered. Further, federal prosecutions in districts in more rural parts of the country such as Maine and Vermont have also been slow to rebound. Out of the ninety federal judicial districts in the U.S., prosecution levels are still below pre-pandemic levels in 14 out of 90. These districts are highlighted in Table 2 below. An additional 6 have prosecution levels that are somewhat below their prior typical levels.

Figure 3A-3B. Federal Non-Immigration Criminal Prosecutions
in New York South and Florida South Judicial Districts,
August 2019 - August 2020

Month-by-month counts of criminal prosecutions (excluding those for immigration offenses) for each U.S. Attorney office are shown below in Table 2. Also shown is the monthly average for the period before the pandemic (August 2019 - February 2020) which can be compared with the monthly filing pattern post-pandemic. Highlighted are offices where none of the months since the federal offices were closed because of COVID-19 have rebounded to the average level that prevailed during the pre-pandemic period.

Table 1. Federal Ciminal Prosecutions,
August 2019 - August 2020
Month Federal Criminal Prosecutions
All Immigration Non-Immigration
Aug-19 14,708 9,021 5,687
Sep-19 13,844 7,632 6,212
Oct-19 13,253 7,497 5,756
Nov-19 11,880 6,738 5,142
Dec-19 11,951 7,133 4,818
Jan-20 12,730 8,017 4,713
Feb-20 13,833 8,487 5,346
Mar-20 11,201 6,891 4,310
Apr-20 2,810 1,093 1,717
May-20 3,647 1,091 2,556
Jun-20 6,162 1,598 4,564
Jul-20 6,248 1,067 5,181
Aug-20 6,803 1,479 5,324
Table 2. Federal Non-Immigration Criminal Prosecutions
by Federal Judicial District,
August 2019 - August 2020
Judicial District Number of Non-Immigration Criminal Prosecutions Filed by Month Aug'19-Feb'20
2019-08 2019-09 2019-10 2019-11 2019-12 2020-01 2020-02 2020-03 2020-04 2020-05 2020-06 2020-07 2020-08 Average Compare*
All 5,687 6,212 5,756 5,142 4,818 4,713 5,346 4,310 1,717 2,556 4,564 5,181 5,324 5,382
Ala, M 2 27 3 16 12 33 22 26 0 1 0 21 2 16
Ala, N 38 133 9 88 34 13 62 44 4 2 58 19 66 54
Ala, S 23 36 5 42 3 30 40 13 0 6 31 1 31 26
Alaska 25 11 20 17 5 24 1 28 2 0 6 20 23 15
Arizona 165 182 173 167 176 160 168 120 30 41 55 67 97 170 Below
Ark, E 71 72 100 72 48 75 47 45 4 10 41 120 49 69
Ark, W 41 13 31 37 5 17 5 44 2 2 5 24 56 21
Cal, C 215 180 171 115 156 105 182 163 77 60 45 135 134 161 Slight Below
Cal, E 74 66 36 70 48 41 47 14 12 7 34 23 13 55 Below
Cal, N 97 122 67 77 88 51 78 37 18 49 57 50 53 83 Below
Cal, S 282 367 213 270 206 192 212 134 137 213 374 471 322 249
Colorao 40 28 36 39 22 67 55 21 10 11 25 66 45 41
Conn 33 38 46 30 14 39 17 34 13 26 20 30 20 31
D. C. 43 41 39 42 48 31 72 25 15 20 23 38 25 45 Slight Below
Delaware 7 1 0 8 10 5 7 4 0 3 5 8 6 5
Fla, M 145 121 159 112 86 92 112 62 19 32 121 81 69 118
Fla, N 23 34 29 57 19 14 16 18 0 20 48 26 38 27
Fla, S 147 195 146 130 119 82 125 80 28 22 30 28 25 135 Below
Ga, M 67 47 25 65 32 31 47 43 4 1 70 21 32 45
Ga, N 52 83 135 80 35 54 52 117 43 11 40 92 55 70
Ga, S 32 91 38 39 26 68 19 57 18 28 113 83 39 45
Hawaii 38 37 52 22 46 50 61 17 13 27 28 54 54 44
Idaho 34 18 20 47 21 31 33 8 3 5 46 33 22 29
Ill, C 25 28 23 30 25 17 52 40 3 6 26 40 32 29
Ill, N 93 67 43 72 54 99 47 38 7 40 60 126 107 68
Ill, S 34 28 34 34 9 18 26 33 5 6 45 38 46 26
Ind, N 44 38 37 38 30 26 46 20 10 10 31 49 56 37
Ind, S 52 34 49 34 53 67 49 62 13 8 37 59 59 48
Iowa, N 29 53 29 25 22 17 37 12 4 32 40 39 25 30
Iowa, S 34 58 37 59 66 35 44 26 7 30 64 41 43 48
Kansas 90 35 64 21 41 42 58 38 3 7 25 24 26 50 Below
Ken, E 41 49 50 35 48 49 38 57 1 19 47 40 38 44
Ken, W 35 23 35 31 32 13 10 50 9 7 22 36 26 26
La, E 25 32 33 24 17 15 25 16 0 1 12 17 19 24 Slight Below
La, M 9 23 12 13 10 24 7 6 0 1 5 11 3 14 Slight Below
La, W 42 62 62 33 22 26 60 11 1 20 31 45 15 44
Maine 21 28 18 26 21 27 15 7 0 6 11 7 10 22 Below
Maryland 61 35 74 43 52 45 64 47 10 5 19 59 57 53
Mass 72 87 43 74 88 58 51 19 22 4 13 69 51 68
Mich, E 68 85 66 40 56 46 46 41 17 11 51 52 50 58 Slight Below
Mich, W 45 30 33 18 35 26 28 3 7 18 39 26 20 31
Minnesota 35 23 33 54 39 20 27 19 1 39 26 26 44 33
Miss, N 10 19 16 0 11 8 13 0 1 0 1 0 12 11
Miss, S 25 39 21 31 4 42 33 20 11 9 32 17 40 28
Mo, E 113 149 128 95 81 106 112 67 15 70 66 87 134 112
Mo, W 80 53 108 96 95 87 62 46 2 27 81 86 125 83
Montana 31 29 38 22 22 18 30 26 6 23 51 45 49 27
N Car, E 105 70 77 46 70 80 65 51 70 99 96 84 89 73
N Car, M 72 26 62 34 35 20 34 9 1 40 70 50 13 40
N Car, W 68 47 63 35 71 18 66 54 25 47 75 60 63 53
N Dakota 49 45 19 22 18 13 65 22 10 11 53 58 48 33
N Mexico 81 71 72 77 59 45 119 41 28 52 93 59 87 75
N. J. 56 54 150 190 97 134 88 102 20 35 74 84 54 110 Below
N. Y., E 110 112 82 57 43 74 61 30 5 28 14 39 50 77 Below
N. Y., N 41 23 55 12 9 50 37 30 4 25 17 20 50 32
N. Y., S 135 169 162 197 172 145 195 190 23 18 64 68 72 168 Below
N. Y., W 35 75 39 29 31 31 39 37 36 43 54 40 54 40
Nebraska 51 44 36 29 51 63 34 6 4 9 98 53 28 44
Nevada 43 55 61 45 30 34 33 35 26 35 41 64 57 43
New Hamp 8 26 22 20 32 29 16 11 5 1 6 7 20 22
Ohio, N 91 84 101 69 67 82 73 126 14 52 87 86 96 81
Ohio, S 53 85 64 87 30 51 50 63 28 15 48 46 58 60
Okla, E 7 34 4 11 9 17 4 5 0 0 15 16 30 12
Okla, N 30 19 49 23 19 14 19 9 9 7 27 27 79 25
Okla, W 55 25 62 41 123 45 37 37 7 50 57 59 25 55
Oregon 78 86 71 34 54 23 37 46 36 39 41 97 109 55
Penn, E 51 104 57 29 30 57 29 37 7 15 13 15 65 51
Penn, M 24 23 35 12 26 25 51 21 2 2 45 68 50 28
Penn, W 45 48 59 54 39 44 34 39 4 51 130 52 160 46
R. I. 14 16 11 24 13 10 15 4 5 5 7 25 19 15
S Car 45 46 25 52 61 34 39 52 12 5 21 41 63 43
S Dakota 41 32 42 24 53 56 53 62 10 15 16 75 84 43
Tenn, E 80 98 96 67 81 55 82 65 14 8 16 26 32 80 Below
Tenn, M 42 16 32 21 51 36 38 10 6 2 10 12 25 34 Below
Tenn, W 74 66 25 69 44 45 55 18 7 5 31 30 36 54 Below
Texas, E 85 65 76 86 75 72 97 101 11 36 162 120 83 79
Texas, N 155 252 182 161 104 170 170 127 27 120 167 120 125 171 Slight Below
Texas, S 245 319 237 162 183 209 233 271 103 130 204 169 205 227 Below
Texas, W 180 258 222 183 179 178 166 165 118 113 134 262 244 195
Utah 48 46 81 60 60 47 52 43 23 27 28 74 92 56
Vermont 12 12 16 9 14 30 15 2 7 9 9 6 8 15 Below
Virg, E 247 226 259 170 223 192 351 216 300 261 175 161 223 238
Virg, W 41 58 64 32 49 63 36 40 9 13 54 48 25 49
W Virg, N 39 22 24 6 20 9 21 91 1 3 13 44 93 20
W Virg, S 35 64 24 20 22 22 25 18 6 10 19 34 45 30
Wash, E 14 17 22 30 38 9 21 25 8 2 24 14 22 22
Wash, W 48 38 68 39 40 40 48 10 41 59 42 42 76 46
Wisc, E 18 30 17 33 46 10 72 10 3 0 45 60 18 32
Wisc, W 15 32 12 14 16 9 15 9 5 8 24 23 8 16
Wyoming 9 27 19 59 56 25 22 29 15 31 7 29 7 31

Footnotes

[1] See earlier TRAC reports covering criminal referrals and prosecutions through March 2020, April 2020 and June 2020 covering earlier criminal prosecution trends by these and other federal agencies who served as the the lead investigative agencies.

TRAC offers free monthly reports on program categories such as white collar crime, immigration, drugs, weapons and terrorism and on selected government agencies such as the IRS, FBI, ATF and DHS. For the latest information on prosecutions and convictions, go to https://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/bulletins/. In addition, subscribers to the TRACFed data service can generate custom reports for a specific agency, judicial district, program category, lead charge or judge via the TRAC Data Interpreter.