Internal administrative data from the Justice
Department indicate huge variations in how most
federal investigative agencies, including the U.S.
Customs Service, enforce the law in different parts
of the country.
In 1998, for example, almost two thirds of all
referrals for prosecution by the U.S. Customs
Service were made in just six of the 90 federal
judicial districts in the United States. These six
were California South (San Diego), Texas West (San
Antonio), Florida South (Miami), Arizona (Phoenix),
Texas South (Houston), and New York East
(Brooklyn). Activity levels of Arizona and New York
East, however, have been declining since 1992,
while those of California South and particularly
Texas West experienced large increases. (See
map and
table.)
Criminal enforcement activities of the Customs
Service were notably less focused on these six
districts in 1992. Indeed, with more and more
effort in the targeted areas, the 1992-1998 period
saw an absolute decline in referrals for
prosecution by the Customs Service in the remaining
84 districts. (See
table.)
Given the mission of the Customs Service, the
concentration of its referrals in the five target
districts along the nation's southern border and a
sixth that includes the nation's busiest
international airport (Kennedy) would appear to
have considerable validity. But Justice Department
data disclose some other regional variations that
may be harder to explain.
As the nation and its federal criminal system has
grown over the years, the investigative agencies
and prosecutors within each of the federal
districts have developed informal understandings
that give them a powerful voice in how the law is
enforced in their area. Although federal law, the
underlying social "environment" and available
staffing are factors in the formulation of the
enforcement policies in a given district, the
unannounced policies advocated by the regional
administrators and U.S. Attorneys play an important
but usually invisible role in how the system works
in different parts of the country. (Because most
criminal cases are decided without coming to a
formal trial and Congress has approved laws
designed to standardize sentencing, juries and
judges have much less influence than they have in
the past.)
Consider the quite different outcomes resulting
from investigations by the Customs Service in the
six districts where much of its work load is
concentrated.
The sentences resulting from Custom Service
convictions were quite varied. Focusing on fiscal
year 1998, here is the median sentence in the six
busiest districts: Florida South,
46 months; Texas South,
25; New York East,
24; and Texas West
18. In both
Arizona and
California South, the median was 12 months.
(See ranking
table for all districts.)
The Justice Department data also disclosed
differences in the proportion of Customs Service
referrals that resulted in prosecution. While
prosecution rates were generally high, California
South topped this list with
99.6 percent, while it was at the bottom, as
noted earlier, in the length of prison sentences.
Texas West was next where
97.5 percent were prosecuted, followed by
Arizona with
96 percent and New York East with
94.1 percent. Both Florida South with
88.9 percent and Texas South with
88 percent had prosecution rates below ninety
percent. (See ranking
table for all districts.)
As is usually the case, the most active districts
in terms of Customs Service criminal referrals had
a relatively large number of criminal
investigators.
But districts with comparatively larger numbers of
investigators did not always generate more
referrals. For example, while
Arizona and
Texas West had about the same number of
criminal investigators in 1998, Texas West had
nearly two and a half times Arizona's number of
referrals for prosecution. While Arizona and
New York East had about the same number of
referrals for prosecution, Arizona had twice the
number of criminal investigatgors. Florida South
spent about
18 weeks of criminal investigator's time on
average per criminal referral, while California
South spent only
6 weeks per criminal referral. (See
criminal investigators versus
prosecution referrals for all districts.)
Time to process cases also varied. In 1998 in New
York East, for example, the median time from when a
referral was made by the agency to when the process
was completed was 204 days. By contrast, the median
time -- half took more, half took less -- in Texas
South was only 129 days. (See
table.)