Immigration Prosecutions for June 2020
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during June 2020 the government reported 1597 new immigration prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 46.5 percent over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with immigration-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).
When monthly 2020 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was down (-52%). Prosecutions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are down 27.2 percent from levels reported in 2015.
The dip in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall decrease in immigration prosecutions is 18.4 percent instead of 27.2 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.
Figure 1. Monthly Trends in Immigration Prosecutions
The decrease from the levels five years ago in immigration prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of immigration prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Virtually all federal criminal prosecutions for immigration offenses in June 2020 (100 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting most immigration criminal investigations under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.
Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In June 2020, 1341 defendants in immigration cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.
In the magistrate courts in June the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326 involving "Reentry of deported alien". This was the lead charge for 50.4 percent of all magistrate filings in June.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc." (34.1%), "08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" (13.6%).
Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts
In June 2020, 256 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during June there were an additional 931 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during June.
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of immigration matters filed in U.S. District Court during June 2020.
Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago 08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 867 1 1 1 More 08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 254 2 2 2 More 18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 18 3 3 3 More 18 USC 1544 - Misuse of passport 10 4 5 4 More 08 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 7 5 4 5 More 18 USC 758 - High speed flight from immigration checkpoint 5 6 21 24 More 42 USC 408 - Fed Old Age, Survivors & Disab Insur -Penalties 5 6 20 18 More 18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 4 8 6 10 More 21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 3 9 11 19 More 18 USC 3 - Accessory after the fact 2 10 16 28 More 18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 2 10 9 9 More Table 2. Top Charges Filed
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.
Ranked 3rd was "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546. "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions — up 200 percent — compared to one year ago was Title 42 U.S.C Section 408 that involves " Fed Old Age, Survivors & Disab Insur -Penalties ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase — 400 percent — was registered for prosecutions under " Accessory after the fact " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 3 ).
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago — down 69 percent — was " Firearms; Unlawful acts " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions — 72.5 percent — was for filings where the lead charge was " Misuse of passport " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1544 ).
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.
Judicial District Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago Texas, S 610 1 2 1 More Arizona 132 2 5 4 More Cal, S 103 3 3 5 More Texas, W 94 4 1 2 More N Mexico 64 5 4 3 More Utah 13 6 19 7 More Fla, M 12 7 7 9 More Virg, E 12 7 9 14 More Wash, E 9 9 15 45 More N. Y., N 8 10 16 13 More Nebraska 8 10 17 11 More Nevada 8 10 30 29 More Table 3. Top 10 Districts
The Southern District of Texas (Houston) — with 610 prosecutions — was the most active during June 2020. The Southern District of Texas (Houston) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 for most frequent use five years ago.
The District of Arizona ranked 2nd. The District of Arizona was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 for most frequent use five years ago.
Southern District of California (San Diego) is now ranking 3rd. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 for most frequent use five years ago.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Eastern District of Washington (Spokane), now ranked 9th , and Northern District of New York (Syracuse) at 10th In the same order, these districts ranked 15th and 16th one year ago and 45th and 13th five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in immigration prosecutions compared to one year ago — 120 percent — was Utah . Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth — 87.7 percent — was Middle District of Florida (Tampa).
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in immigration prosecutions — 58.4 percent — was Eastern District of Washington (Spokane). But over the past five years, New Mexico showed the largest drop — 39.6 percent.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases of this type during June 2020 are shown in Table 4.
Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago Saldana, Diana Texas, S 111 1 8 12 More Garcia Marmolejo, Marina Texas, S 108 2 9 10 More Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 75 3 11 9 More Crane, Randy Texas, S 66 4 14 6 More Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 65 5 11 5 More Moses, Alia M. Texas, W 47 6 1 2 More Zipps, Jennifer Guerin Arizona 34 7 24 24 More Marquez, Rosemary Arizona 33 8 27 21 More Olvera, Jose Rolando, Jr. Texas, S 31 9 18 - More Rodriguez, Fernando, Jr. Texas, S 31 9 17 - More Table 4. Top Ten Judges
All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration filings.
Judge Diana Saldana in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 1st with 111 defendants in immigration cases. Judge Saldana also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 8).
Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 108 defendants in immigration cases. Judge Garcia Marmolejo appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 9) and five years ago (rank 10).
Judge Micaela Alvarez in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 75 defendants in immigration cases.
Report Generated: July 16, 2020
