Immigration Prosecutions for April 2019
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during April 2019 the government reported 9035 new immigration prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 6.2 percent over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with immigration-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).
When monthly 2019 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was up (60.7%). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 55.4 percent from levels reported in 2014.
The growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in immigration prosecutions is 10.1 percent instead of 55.4 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.
Figure 1. Monthly Trends in Immigration Prosecutions
The increase from the levels five years ago in immigration prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of immigration prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Virtually all federal criminal prosecutions for immigration offenses in April 2019 (100 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting most immigration criminal investigations under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.
Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In April 2019, 8121 defendants in immigration cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.
In the magistrate courts in April the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 65.6 percent of all magistrate filings in April.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (28.2%).
Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts
In April 2019, 914 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during April there were an additional 1416 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during April.
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of immigration matters filed in U.S. District Court during April 2019.
Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago 08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,769 1 1 1 More 08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 390 2 2 2 More 18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 53 3 4 3 More 08 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 41 4 3 4 More 18 USC 1544 - Misuse of passport 26 5 5 5 More 18 USC 1543 - Forgery or false use of passport 8 6 14 23 More 18 USC 1542 - False statement in application and use of passport 7 7 6 6 More 46 USC 70503 - Possession control substance on vessel subject to jurisdiction of US 6 8 - - More 21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 5 9 12 26 More 19 USC 1459 - Reporting requirements for individuals 4 10 17 19 More Table 2. Top Charges Filed
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.
Ranked 3rd was "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546. "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions — up 700 percent — compared to one year ago was Title 19 U.S.C Section 1459 that involves " Reporting requirements for individuals ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase — 1533.3 percent — was registered for prosecutions under " Forgery or false use of passport " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1543 ).
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago — down 67.2 percent — was " Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. " (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions — 55.1 percent — was for filings where the lead charge was " False statement in application and use of passport " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1542 ).
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.
Judicial District Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago Texas, W 531 1 1 2 More Texas, S 463 2 3 1 More Arizona 302 3 5 3 More Cal, S 281 4 2 5 More N Mexico 198 5 4 4 More Fla, M 44 6 7 9 More Fla, S 43 7 6 6 More Miss, S 20 8 40 46 More Texas, E 17 9 25 17 More Ill, N 16 10 41 47 More Mich, E 16 10 10 7 More Table 3. Top 10 Districts
The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) — with 531 prosecutions — was the most active during April 2019. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 for most frequent use five years ago.
The Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd. The Southern District of Texas (Houston) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 for most frequent use five years ago.
District of Arizona is now ranking 3rd. The District of Arizona was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 for most frequent use five years ago.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Eastern District of Texas (Tyler), now ranked 9th , and Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) at 8th In the same order, these districts ranked 25th and 40th one year ago and 17th and 46th five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in immigration prosecutions compared to one year ago — 115.4 percent — was Northern District of Illinois (Chicago). This was the same district that had the largest increase — 180 percent — when compared with five years ago.
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in immigration prosecutions — 32.4 percent — was Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit). This was the same district that had the largest increase — 52.1 percent — when compared with five years ago.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases of this type during April 2019 are shown in Table 4.
Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago Moses, Alia M. Texas, W 87 1 1 3 More Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 78 2 12 16 More Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 74 3 9 17 More Guaderrama, David C. Texas, W 74 3 11 15 More Counts, Walter David, III Texas, W 67 5 10 - More Ramos, Nelva Gonzales Texas, S 63 6 14 19 More Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 60 7 13 18 More Rodriguez, Fernando, Jr. Texas, S 55 8 - - More Olvera, Jose Rolando, Jr. Texas, S 53 9 16 - More Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 49 10 2 1 More Table 4. Top Ten Judges
All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration filings.
Judge Alia M. Moses in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 1st with 87 defendants in immigration cases. Judge Moses appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 3).
Judge Kathleen Cardone in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd with 78 defendants in immigration cases.
Judges Philip Ray Martinez in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) and David C. Guaderrama in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 3rd with 74 defendants in immigration cases. Judge Martinez also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 9).
Report Generated: May 31, 2019
