Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals That Are Prosecuted 2009
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Prosecuted# DeclinedPercentRank
U.S. 1,280 1,242 50.8 -
Ala, N Birmingham 10 11 47.6 57
Ala, M Montgomery 3 0 100.0 1
Ala, S Mobile 1 8 11.1 85
Alaska Anchorage 3 0 100.0 1
Arizona Phoenix 17 23 42.5 65
Ark, E Little Rock 1 6 14.3 82
Ark, W Fort Smith 7 10 41.2 66
Cal, N San Francisco 19 22 46.3 58
Cal, C Los Angeles 78 82 48.8 56
Cal, E Sacramento 55 42 56.7 46
Cal, S San Diego 12 10 54.5 47
Colorado Denver 22 22 50.0 50
Conn New Haven 26 27 49.1 55
Delaware Wilmington 10 5 66.7 22
D. C. Washington 4 3 57.1 43
Fla, N Pensacola 7 10 41.2 66
Fla, M Tampa 39 40 49.4 54
Fla, S Miami 50 29 63.3 28
Ga, N Atlanta 23 5 82.1 7
Ga, M Macon 6 14 30.0 79
Ga, S Savannah 9 6 60.0 34
Hawaii Honolulu 3 2 60.0 34
Idaho Boise 9 0 100.0 1
Ill, N Chicago 39 33 54.2 48
Ill, S East St. Louis 13 9 59.1 39
Ill, C Springfield 8 1 88.9 4
Ind, N South Bend 3 4 42.9 62
Ind, S Indianapolis 16 21 43.2 61
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 1 7 12.5 84
Iowa, S Des Moines 3 7 30.0 79
Kansas Topeka 36 10 78.3 9
Ken, E Lexington 1 12 7.7 86
Ken, W Louisville 12 81 12.9 83
La, E New Orleans 5 1 83.3 5
La, M Baton Rouge 2 3 40.0 68
La, W Shreveport 6 13 31.6 78
Maine Portland 0 5 0.0 87
Maryland Baltimore 22 9 71.0 18
Mass Boston 30 17 63.8 26
Mich, E Detroit 26 16 61.9 32
Mich, W Grand Rapids 5 2 71.4 17
MinnesotaMinneapolis 19 14 57.6 41
Miss, N Oxford 9 5 64.3 25
Miss, S Jackson 12 15 44.4 59
Mo, E St. Louis 10 17 37.0 73
Mo, W Kansas City 17 12 58.6 40
Montana Billings 2 4 33.3 75
Nebraska Omaha 3 2 60.0 34
Nevada Las Vegas 24 18 57.1 43
New Hamp Concord 2 3 40.0 68
N. J. Newark 38 16 70.4 19
N Mexico Albuquerque 6 2 75.0 12
N. Y., N Syracuse 8 6 57.1 43
N. Y., E Brooklyn 30 10 75.0 12
N. Y., S Manhattan 32 15 68.1 21
N. Y., W Buffalo 20 17 54.1 49
N Car, E Raleigh 18 12 60.0 34
N Car, M Greensboro 4 7 36.4 74
N Car, W Asheville 12 15 44.4 59
N Dakota Fargo 2 3 40.0 68
Ohio, N Cleveland 20 12 62.5 30
Ohio, S Cincinnati 31 18 63.3 28
Okla, N Tulsa 6 9 40.0 68
Okla, E Muskogee 0 1 0.0 87
Okla, W Oklahoma City 9 3 75.0 12
Oregon Portland 23 17 57.5 42
Penn, E Philadelphia 9 6 60.0 34
Penn, M Scranton 10 3 76.9 10
Penn, W Pittsburgh 29 18 61.7 33
R. I. Providence 3 1 75.0 12
S Car Columbia 16 5 76.2 11
S Dakota Sioux Falls 2 1 66.7 22
Tenn, E Knoxville 11 3 78.6 8
Tenn, M Nashville 6 6 50.0 50
Tenn, W Memphis 6 2 75.0 12
Texas, N Fort Worth 23 49 31.9 77
Texas, E Tyler 36 16 69.2 20
Texas, S Houston 23 14 62.2 31
Texas, W San Antonio 27 36 42.9 62
Utah Salt Lake City 14 3 82.4 6
Vermont Burlington 0 0 - -
Virg, E Alexandria 15 24 38.5 72
Virg, W Roanoke 6 8 42.9 62
Wash, E Spokane 0 7 0.0 87
Wash, W Seattle 10 20 33.3 75
W Virg, NWheeling 7 7 50.0 50
W Virg, SCharleston 9 52 14.8 81
Wisc, E Milwaukee 7 4 63.6 27
Wisc, W Madison 4 2 66.7 22
Wyoming Cheyenne 1 1 50.0 50


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010