Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2008
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 2,411 1,298 1,124 46.6 -
Ala, N Birmingham 19 10 7 36.8 58
Ala, M Montgomery 3 3 2 66.7 18
Ala, S Mobile 6 0 0 0.0 86
Alaska Anchorage 5 2 2 40.0 55
Arizona Phoenix 30 13 10 33.3 62
Ark, E Little Rock 5 1 1 20.0 83
Ark, W Fort Smith 11 5 5 45.5 45
Cal, N San Francisco 89 58 48 53.9 36
Cal, C Los Angeles 126 39 35 27.8 75
Cal, E Sacramento 73 42 40 54.8 34
Cal, S San Diego 20 11 9 45.0 46
Colorado Denver 16 6 5 31.3 70
Conn New Haven 37 19 18 48.6 42
Delaware Wilmington 16 5 5 31.3 70
D. C. Washington 5 3 3 60.0 23
Fla, N Pensacola 7 2 2 28.6 74
Fla, M Tampa 96 31 28 29.2 73
Fla, S Miami 62 48 44 71.0 15
Ga, N Atlanta 46 41 37 80.4 5
Ga, M Macon 10 7 6 60.0 23
Ga, S Savannah 17 6 6 35.3 61
Hawaii Honolulu 6 5 5 83.3 3
Idaho Boise 11 8 3 27.3 76
Ill, N Chicago 56 35 34 60.7 21
Ill, S East St. Louis 15 8 8 53.3 37
Ill, C Springfield 7 4 3 42.9 50
Ind, N South Bend 22 15 13 59.1 27
Ind, S Indianapolis 22 10 9 40.9 54
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 3 1 1 33.3 62
Iowa, S Des Moines 3 1 1 33.3 62
Kansas Topeka 9 8 7 77.8 7
Ken, E Lexington 15 6 5 33.3 62
Ken, W Louisville 25 8 6 24.0 81
La, E New Orleans 11 6 6 54.5 35
La, M Baton Rouge 10 6 5 50.0 38
La, W Shreveport 10 5 3 30.0 72
Maine Portland 4 3 3 75.0 9
Maryland Baltimore 48 27 23 47.9 43
Mass Boston 45 20 20 44.4 47
Mich, E Detroit 30 24 22 73.3 13
Mich, W Grand Rapids 28 13 9 32.1 68
MinnesotaMinneapolis 38 37 37 97.4 2
Miss, N Oxford 16 0 0 0.0 86
Miss, S Jackson 36 9 9 25.0 79
Mo, E St. Louis 22 15 13 59.1 27
Mo, W Kansas City 25 10 10 40.0 55
Montana Billings 18 7 6 33.3 62
Nebraska Omaha 10 6 2 20.0 83
Nevada Las Vegas 36 19 12 33.3 62
New Hamp Concord 4 3 3 75.0 9
N. J. Newark 72 54 44 61.1 20
N Mexico Albuquerque 4 1 1 25.0 79
N. Y., N Syracuse 20 11 11 55.0 33
N. Y., E Brooklyn 35 18 16 45.7 44
N. Y., S Manhattan 45 31 17 37.8 57
N. Y., W Buffalo 35 24 11 31.4 69
N Car, E Raleigh 48 27 24 50.0 38
N Car, M Greensboro 9 4 4 44.4 47
N Car, W Asheville 10 8 8 80.0 6
N Dakota Fargo 4 3 3 75.0 9
Ohio, N Cleveland 57 31 28 49.1 41
Ohio, S Cincinnati 54 37 32 59.3 26
Okla, N Tulsa 8 7 6 75.0 9
Okla, E Muskogee 0 0 0 - -
Okla, W Oklahoma City 17 9 7 41.2 53
Oregon Portland 42 30 24 57.1 30
Penn, E Philadelphia 56 35 34 60.7 21
Penn, M Scranton 10 7 6 60.0 23
Penn, W Pittsburgh 46 34 33 71.7 14
R. I. Providence 8 5 5 62.5 19
S Car Columbia 22 17 17 77.3 8
S Dakota Sioux Falls 6 6 5 83.3 3
Tenn, E Knoxville 14 8 8 57.1 30
Tenn, M Nashville 8 5 4 50.0 38
Tenn, W Memphis 14 8 6 42.9 50
Texas, N Fort Worth 90 42 40 44.4 47
Texas, E Tyler 45 17 12 26.7 78
Texas, S Houston 33 14 12 36.4 60
Texas, W San Antonio 31 23 21 67.7 17
Utah Salt Lake City 38 23 21 55.3 32
Vermont Burlington 1 1 1 100.0 1
Virg, E Alexandria 44 12 12 27.3 76
Virg, W Roanoke 19 11 7 36.8 58
Wash, E Spokane 5 0 0 0.0 86
Wash, W Seattle 23 16 16 69.6 16
W Virg, NWheeling 45 7 5 11.1 85
W Virg, SCharleston 36 8 8 22.2 82
Wisc, E Milwaukee 29 18 17 58.6 29
Wisc, W Madison 12 5 5 41.7 52
Wyoming Cheyenne 1 0 0 0.0 86


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010