Percent of IRS Criminal Convictions Under U.S. Attorney Program Categories 2007
Districts in Alphabetical Order -- Tax Fraud


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

Non-TaxTax-Fraud
DistrictCityTotal ReferralsPercentRankPercentRank
U.S. 1,081 43.1 - 56.9 -
Ala, N Birmingham 16 18.8 61 81.3 26
Ala, M Montgomery 4 50.0 27 50.0 53
Ala, S Mobile 5 60.0 18 40.0 69
Alaska Anchorage 4 75.0 10 25.0 77
Arizona Phoenix 12 41.7 42 58.3 45
Ark, E Little Rock 2 50.0 27 50.0 53
Ark, W Fort Smith 2 0.0 76 100.0 1
Cal, N San Francisco 30 76.7 9 23.3 78
Cal, C Los Angeles 45 17.8 63 82.2 24
Cal, E Sacramento 39 61.5 16 38.5 71
Cal, S San Diego 14 21.4 59 78.6 28
Colorado Denver 9 22.2 58 77.8 29
Conn New Haven 16 12.5 70 87.5 13
Delaware Wilmington 4 25.0 54 75.0 31
D. C. Washington 5 40.0 43 60.0 43
Fla, N Pensacola 5 20.0 60 80.0 27
Fla, M Tampa 37 24.3 57 75.7 30
Fla, S Miami 33 51.5 26 48.5 61
Ga, N Atlanta 15 73.3 11 26.7 76
Ga, M Macon 8 12.5 70 87.5 13
Ga, S Savannah 6 66.7 12 33.3 73
Hawaii Honolulu 8 37.5 46 62.5 39
Idaho Boise 4 100.0 1 0.0 81
Ill, N Chicago 65 47.7 36 52.3 51
Ill, S East St. Louis 4 100.0 1 0.0 81
Ill, C Springfield 6 100.0 1 0.0 81
Ind, N South Bend 12 66.7 12 33.3 73
Ind, S Indianapolis 22 86.4 8 13.6 79
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 1 0.0 76 100.0 1
Iowa, S Des Moines 4 50.0 27 50.0 53
Kansas Topeka 1 0.0 76 100.0 1
Ken, E Lexington 8 12.5 70 87.5 13
Ken, W Louisville 8 12.5 70 87.5 13
La, E New Orleans 9 0.0 76 100.0 1
La, M Baton Rouge 4 0.0 76 100.0 1
La, W Shreveport 12 16.7 65 83.3 19
Maine Portland 2 0.0 76 100.0 1
Maryland Baltimore 25 44.0 41 56.0 46
Mass Boston 28 32.1 52 67.9 35
Mich, E Detroit 40 57.5 19 42.5 68
Mich, W Grand Rapids 9 33.3 50 66.7 36
MinnesotaMinneapolis 8 37.5 46 62.5 39
Miss, N Oxford 0 - - - -
Miss, S Jackson 10 50.0 27 50.0 53
Mo, E St. Louis 4 50.0 27 50.0 53
Mo, W Kansas City 11 18.2 62 81.8 25
Montana Billings 4 25.0 54 75.0 31
Nebraska Omaha 6 16.7 65 83.3 19
Nevada Las Vegas 17 17.6 64 82.4 23
New Hamp Concord 2 50.0 27 50.0 53
N. J. Newark 30 30.0 53 70.0 34
N Mexico Albuquerque 2 0.0 76 100.0 1
N. Y., N Syracuse 9 44.4 39 55.6 47
N. Y., E Brooklyn 41 46.3 37 53.7 50
N. Y., S Manhattan 14 14.3 69 85.7 18
N. Y., W Buffalo 9 44.4 39 55.6 47
N Car, E Raleigh 13 53.8 24 46.2 62
N Car, M Greensboro 3 66.7 12 33.3 73
N Car, W Asheville 7 57.1 20 42.9 65
N Dakota Fargo 2 50.0 27 50.0 53
Ohio, N Cleveland 20 40.0 43 60.0 43
Ohio, S Cincinnati 30 50.0 27 50.0 53
Okla, N Tulsa 6 16.7 65 83.3 19
Okla, E Muskogee 2 0.0 76 100.0 1
Okla, W Oklahoma City 6 16.7 65 83.3 19
Oregon Portland 18 61.1 17 38.9 70
Penn, E Philadelphia 11 36.4 49 63.6 38
Penn, M Scranton 11 63.6 15 36.4 72
Penn, W Pittsburgh 23 47.8 35 52.2 52
R. I. Providence 4 0.0 76 100.0 1
S Car Columbia 13 46.2 38 53.8 49
S Dakota Sioux Falls 0 - - - -
Tenn, E Knoxville 14 57.1 20 42.9 65
Tenn, M Nashville 8 37.5 46 62.5 39
Tenn, W Memphis 8 12.5 70 87.5 13
Texas, N Fort Worth 13 53.8 24 46.2 62
Texas, E Tyler 14 57.1 20 42.9 65
Texas, S Houston 13 38.5 45 61.5 42
Texas, W San Antonio 12 91.7 7 8.3 80
Utah Salt Lake City 9 55.6 23 44.4 64
Vermont Burlington 4 100.0 1 0.0 81
Virg, E Alexandria 17 5.9 75 94.1 12
Virg, W Roanoke 4 100.0 1 0.0 81
Wash, E Spokane 0 - - - -
Wash, W Seattle 9 33.3 50 66.7 36
W Virg, NWheeling 5 0.0 76 100.0 1
W Virg, SCharleston 4 0.0 76 100.0 1
Wisc, E Milwaukee 8 25.0 54 75.0 31
Wisc, W Madison 1 100.0 1 0.0 81
Wyoming Cheyenne 0 - - - -
Note: Tax-fraud cases are defined as program category 033.


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010