Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2006
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 2,224 1,242 1,092 49.1 -
Ala, S Mobile 8 8 8 100.0 1
Ark, W Fort Smith 1 1 1 100.0 1
Fla, N Pensacola 3 3 3 100.0 1
Okla, E Muskogee 3 3 3 100.0 1
Ill, C Springfield 12 11 11 91.7 5
Wash, W Seattle 24 21 19 79.2 6
La, W Shreveport 9 8 7 77.8 7
Ohio, N Cleveland 44 38 34 77.3 8
S Car Columbia 22 17 17 77.3 8
Ind, N South Bend 17 13 13 76.5 10
Wash, E Spokane 4 4 3 75.0 11
Hawaii Honolulu 14 11 10 71.4 12
Miss, N Oxford 7 5 5 71.4 12
N. J. Newark 53 41 37 69.8 14
Mich, W Grand Rapids 33 24 23 69.7 15
Conn New Haven 26 18 18 69.2 16
Mass Boston 37 27 25 67.6 17
Cal, E Sacramento 39 29 26 66.7 18
Colorado Denver 21 17 14 66.7 18
Maine Portland 9 6 6 66.7 18
MinnesotaMinneapolis 18 13 12 66.7 18
Nevada Las Vegas 21 17 14 66.7 18
Tenn, M Nashville 6 5 4 66.7 18
Virg, E Alexandria 42 28 27 64.3 24
Fla, S Miami 64 51 41 64.1 25
Okla, W Oklahoma City 11 9 7 63.6 26
Wisc, E Milwaukee 22 14 14 63.6 26
Ill, S East St. Louis 24 16 15 62.5 28
Penn, M Scranton 21 14 13 61.9 29
Ill, N Chicago 77 51 47 61.0 30
Mich, E Detroit 33 22 20 60.6 31
Penn, E Philadelphia 53 33 32 60.4 32
Okla, N Tulsa 15 9 9 60.0 33
Cal, S San Diego 34 22 20 58.8 34
Tenn, W Memphis 19 12 11 57.9 35
Penn, W Pittsburgh 33 20 19 57.6 36
Texas, W San Antonio 66 40 38 57.6 36
Maryland Baltimore 38 21 21 55.3 38
N Car, W Asheville 20 12 11 55.0 39
Ga, M Macon 13 9 7 53.8 40
Wisc, W Madison 13 7 7 53.8 40
N Car, M Greensboro 15 10 8 53.3 42
N. Y., N Syracuse 17 9 9 52.9 43
Ala, M Montgomery 2 1 1 50.0 44
Iowa, S Des Moines 2 2 1 50.0 44
Ken, W Louisville 6 4 3 50.0 44
La, E New Orleans 12 6 6 50.0 44
Montana Billings 12 6 6 50.0 44
N. Y., S Manhattan 46 25 23 50.0 44
S Dakota Sioux Falls 2 1 1 50.0 44
Ohio, S Cincinnati 23 12 11 47.8 51
N Car, E Raleigh 17 9 8 47.1 52
Cal, C Los Angeles 92 50 42 45.7 53
La, M Baton Rouge 9 4 4 44.4 54
Ala, N Birmingham 16 8 7 43.8 55
Ga, S Savannah 14 8 6 42.9 56
Ind, S Indianapolis 21 9 9 42.9 56
Kansas Topeka 19 9 8 42.1 58
N. Y., E Brooklyn 48 24 20 41.7 59
Tenn, E Knoxville 36 17 15 41.7 59
Texas, S Houston 71 32 29 40.8 61
Alaska Anchorage 5 4 2 40.0 62
Ken, E Lexington 20 12 8 40.0 62
Texas, N Fort Worth 73 42 29 39.7 64
Virg, W Roanoke 13 5 5 38.5 65
Mo, W Kansas City 29 16 11 37.9 66
Ga, N Atlanta 16 6 6 37.5 67
Fla, M Tampa 86 36 32 37.2 68
Arizona Phoenix 31 13 11 35.5 69
Nebraska Omaha 6 3 2 33.3 70
New Hamp Concord 6 2 2 33.3 70
R. I. Providence 3 1 1 33.3 70
Utah Salt Lake City 6 3 2 33.3 70
Wyoming Cheyenne 3 1 1 33.3 70
Idaho Boise 31 11 10 32.3 75
Oregon Portland 25 14 8 32.0 76
W Virg, NWheeling 22 8 7 31.8 77
W Virg, SCharleston 13 4 4 30.8 78
Delaware Wilmington 14 4 4 28.6 79
Cal, N San Francisco 48 16 13 27.1 80
N. Y., W Buffalo 19 9 5 26.3 81
Ark, E Little Rock 21 7 5 23.8 82
Mo, E St. Louis 38 10 9 23.7 83
D. C. Washington 6 1 1 16.7 84
N Mexico Albuquerque 20 4 3 15.0 85
Miss, S Jackson 119 26 15 12.6 86
Texas, E Tyler 11 1 1 9.1 87
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 2 0 0 0.0 88
N Dakota Fargo 2 0 0 0.0 88
Vermont Burlington 2 0 0 0.0 88

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010