Percent of IRS Criminal Convictions Under U.S. Attorney Program Categories 2006
Districts in Alphabetical Order -- Tax Fraud


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

Non-TaxTax-Fraud
DistrictCityTotal ReferralsPercentRankPercentRank
U.S. 1,092 43.3 - 56.7 -
Ala, N Birmingham 7 14.3 72 85.7 15
Ala, M Montgomery 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
Ala, S Mobile 8 100.0 1 0.0 85
Alaska Anchorage 2 100.0 1 0.0 85
Arizona Phoenix 11 45.5 27 54.5 61
Ark, E Little Rock 5 20.0 69 80.0 19
Ark, W Fort Smith 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
Cal, N San Francisco 13 38.5 31 61.5 57
Cal, C Los Angeles 42 26.2 57 73.8 31
Cal, E Sacramento 26 19.2 70 80.8 18
Cal, S San Diego 20 25.0 58 75.0 22
Colorado Denver 14 35.7 36 64.3 51
Conn New Haven 18 33.3 40 66.7 40
Delaware Wilmington 4 25.0 58 75.0 22
D. C. Washington 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
Fla, N Pensacola 3 66.7 16 33.3 70
Fla, M Tampa 32 43.8 28 56.3 60
Fla, S Miami 41 51.2 23 48.8 65
Ga, N Atlanta 6 33.3 40 66.7 40
Ga, M Macon 7 0.0 77 100.0 1
Ga, S Savannah 6 83.3 5 16.7 83
Hawaii Honolulu 10 10.0 75 90.0 13
Idaho Boise 10 80.0 6 20.0 80
Ill, N Chicago 47 29.8 51 70.2 37
Ill, S East St. Louis 15 80.0 6 20.0 80
Ill, C Springfield 11 72.7 11 27.3 76
Ind, N South Bend 13 30.8 49 69.2 39
Ind, S Indianapolis 9 22.2 68 77.8 20
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 0 - - - -
Iowa, S Des Moines 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
Kansas Topeka 8 12.5 74 87.5 14
Ken, E Lexington 8 25.0 58 75.0 22
Ken, W Louisville 3 33.3 40 66.7 40
La, E New Orleans 6 16.7 71 83.3 17
La, M Baton Rouge 4 25.0 58 75.0 22
La, W Shreveport 7 14.3 72 85.7 15
Maine Portland 6 100.0 1 0.0 85
Maryland Baltimore 21 33.3 40 66.7 40
Mass Boston 25 76.0 9 24.0 79
Mich, E Detroit 20 25.0 58 75.0 22
Mich, W Grand Rapids 23 69.6 14 30.4 74
MinnesotaMinneapolis 12 8.3 76 91.7 12
Miss, N Oxford 5 40.0 29 60.0 58
Miss, S Jackson 15 80.0 6 20.0 80
Mo, E St. Louis 9 33.3 40 66.7 40
Mo, W Kansas City 11 27.3 55 72.7 32
Montana Billings 6 33.3 40 66.7 40
Nebraska Omaha 2 0.0 77 100.0 1
Nevada Las Vegas 14 28.6 52 71.4 34
New Hamp Concord 2 50.0 24 50.0 62
N. J. Newark 37 37.8 33 62.2 55
N Mexico Albuquerque 3 66.7 16 33.3 70
N. Y., N Syracuse 9 33.3 40 66.7 40
N. Y., E Brooklyn 20 35.0 38 65.0 50
N. Y., S Manhattan 23 30.4 50 69.6 38
N. Y., W Buffalo 5 60.0 19 40.0 69
N Car, E Raleigh 8 25.0 58 75.0 22
N Car, M Greensboro 8 50.0 24 50.0 62
N Car, W Asheville 11 72.7 11 27.3 76
N Dakota Fargo 0 - - - -
Ohio, N Cleveland 34 58.8 20 41.2 68
Ohio, S Cincinnati 11 27.3 55 72.7 32
Okla, N Tulsa 9 33.3 40 66.7 40
Okla, E Muskogee 3 66.7 16 33.3 70
Okla, W Oklahoma City 7 28.6 52 71.4 34
Oregon Portland 8 25.0 58 75.0 22
Penn, E Philadelphia 32 34.4 39 65.6 49
Penn, M Scranton 13 69.2 15 30.8 73
Penn, W Pittsburgh 19 57.9 21 42.1 66
R. I. Providence 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
S Car Columbia 17 23.5 67 76.5 21
S Dakota Sioux Falls 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
Tenn, E Knoxville 15 73.3 10 26.7 78
Tenn, M Nashville 4 25.0 58 75.0 22
Tenn, W Memphis 11 36.4 35 63.6 53
Texas, N Fort Worth 29 72.4 13 27.6 75
Texas, E Tyler 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
Texas, S Houston 29 37.9 32 62.1 56
Texas, W San Antonio 38 86.8 4 13.2 84
Utah Salt Lake City 2 50.0 24 50.0 62
Vermont Burlington 0 - - - -
Virg, E Alexandria 27 37.0 34 63.0 54
Virg, W Roanoke 5 40.0 29 60.0 58
Wash, E Spokane 3 33.3 40 66.7 40
Wash, W Seattle 19 57.9 21 42.1 66
W Virg, NWheeling 7 28.6 52 71.4 34
W Virg, SCharleston 4 25.0 58 75.0 22
Wisc, E Milwaukee 14 35.7 36 64.3 51
Wisc, W Madison 7 0.0 77 100.0 1
Wyoming Cheyenne 1 0.0 77 100.0 1
Note: Tax-fraud cases are defined as program category 033.


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010