Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals That Are Prosecuted 2006
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Prosecuted# DeclinedPercentRank
U.S. 1,377 982 58.4 -
Ala, N Birmingham 13 8 61.9 43
Ala, M Montgomery 5 1 83.3 16
Ala, S Mobile 2 0 100.0 1
Alaska Anchorage 3 1 75.0 24
Arizona Phoenix 27 18 60.0 46
Ark, E Little Rock 7 14 33.3 78
Ark, W Fort Smith 1 0 100.0 1
Cal, N San Francisco 49 32 60.5 45
Cal, C Los Angeles 75 42 64.1 39
Cal, E Sacramento 37 10 78.7 20
Cal, S San Diego 16 12 57.1 54
Colorado Denver 12 4 75.0 24
Conn New Haven 15 8 65.2 37
Delaware Wilmington 4 10 28.6 83
D. C. Washington 7 5 58.3 51
Fla, N Pensacola 7 0 100.0 1
Fla, M Tampa 51 50 50.5 61
Fla, S Miami 41 13 75.9 22
Ga, N Atlanta 20 10 66.7 32
Ga, M Macon 1 4 20.0 86
Ga, S Savannah 9 6 60.0 46
Hawaii Honolulu 4 3 57.1 54
Idaho Boise 17 20 45.9 66
Ill, N Chicago 52 26 66.7 32
Ill, S East St. Louis 6 8 42.9 70
Ill, C Springfield 7 1 87.5 8
Ind, N South Bend 21 4 84.0 15
Ind, S Indianapolis 13 12 52.0 60
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 1 2 33.3 78
Iowa, S Des Moines 1 0 100.0 1
Kansas Topeka 4 10 28.6 83
Ken, E Lexington 12 8 60.0 46
Ken, W Louisville 11 2 84.6 12
La, E New Orleans 3 6 33.3 78
La, M Baton Rouge 25 5 83.3 16
La, W Shreveport 7 1 87.5 8
Maine Portland 3 3 50.0 62
Maryland Baltimore 28 17 62.2 42
Mass Boston 21 10 67.7 31
Mich, E Detroit 51 11 82.3 19
Mich, W Grand Rapids 8 9 47.1 64
MinnesotaMinneapolis 12 5 70.6 27
Miss, N Oxford 4 2 66.7 32
Miss, S Jackson 20 93 17.7 88
Mo, E St. Louis 24 28 46.2 65
Mo, W Kansas City 19 13 59.4 50
Montana Billings 5 6 45.5 68
Nebraska Omaha 6 3 66.7 32
Nevada Las Vegas 9 4 69.2 29
New Hamp Concord 1 4 20.0 86
N. J. Newark 37 12 75.5 23
N Mexico Albuquerque 2 16 11.1 89
N. Y., N Syracuse 6 8 42.9 70
N. Y., E Brooklyn 40 24 62.5 40
N. Y., S Manhattan 25 21 54.3 57
N. Y., W Buffalo 11 10 52.4 58
N Car, E Raleigh 18 8 69.2 29
N Car, M Greensboro 5 5 50.0 62
N Car, W Asheville 11 8 57.9 52
N Dakota Fargo 1 2 33.3 78
Ohio, N Cleveland 32 6 84.2 14
Ohio, S Cincinnati 39 11 78.0 21
Okla, N Tulsa 4 6 40.0 72
Okla, E Muskogee 3 0 100.0 1
Okla, W Oklahoma City 11 2 84.6 12
Oregon Portland 17 11 60.7 44
Penn, E Philadelphia 13 20 39.4 74
Penn, M Scranton 16 7 69.6 28
Penn, W Pittsburgh 24 13 64.9 38
R. I. Providence 5 2 71.4 26
S Car Columbia 24 5 82.8 18
S Dakota Sioux Falls 6 1 85.7 11
Tenn, E Knoxville 16 19 45.7 67
Tenn, M Nashville 10 1 90.9 7
Tenn, W Memphis 14 7 66.7 32
Texas, N Fort Worth 25 31 44.6 69
Texas, E Tyler 11 10 52.4 58
Texas, S Houston 23 39 37.1 77
Texas, W San Antonio 16 26 38.1 76
Utah Salt Lake City 21 3 87.5 8
Vermont Burlington 1 2 33.3 78
Virg, E Alexandria 19 14 57.6 53
Virg, W Roanoke 3 8 27.3 85
Wash, E Spokane 1 0 100.0 1
Wash, W Seattle 5 3 62.5 40
W Virg, NWheeling 9 14 39.1 75
W Virg, SCharleston 6 9 40.0 72
Wisc, E Milwaukee 12 8 60.0 46
Wisc, W Madison 8 6 57.1 54
Wyoming Cheyenne 0 2 0.0 90


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010