Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2005
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 2,528 1,209 1,086 43.0 -
Ala, N Birmingham 9 2 2 22.2 76
Ala, M Montgomery 1 0 0 0.0 85
Ala, S Mobile 15 6 6 40.0 54
Alaska Anchorage 22 21 21 95.5 3
Arizona Phoenix 31 20 18 58.1 27
Ark, E Little Rock 14 10 10 71.4 10
Ark, W Fort Smith 0 0 0 - -
Cal, N San Francisco 25 12 10 40.0 54
Cal, C Los Angeles 169 63 56 33.1 73
Cal, E Sacramento 70 35 32 45.7 46
Cal, S San Diego 15 10 9 60.0 24
Colorado Denver 29 15 10 34.5 65
Conn New Haven 26 16 16 61.5 22
Delaware Wilmington 18 12 10 55.6 31
D. C. Washington 6 2 2 33.3 68
Fla, N Pensacola 10 7 7 70.0 11
Fla, M Tampa 57 21 21 36.8 62
Fla, S Miami 84 54 49 58.3 26
Ga, N Atlanta 25 16 14 56.0 30
Ga, M Macon 11 4 1 9.1 83
Ga, S Savannah 4 3 3 75.0 8
Hawaii Honolulu 13 8 8 61.5 22
Idaho Boise 10 5 4 40.0 54
Ill, N Chicago 99 43 43 43.4 49
Ill, S East St. Louis 7 3 3 42.9 50
Ill, C Springfield 10 2 2 20.0 78
Ind, N South Bend 24 11 11 45.8 45
Ind, S Indianapolis 16 11 11 68.8 13
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 6 4 4 66.7 15
Iowa, S Des Moines 9 1 1 11.1 81
Kansas Topeka 9 6 5 55.6 31
Ken, E Lexington 12 8 8 66.7 15
Ken, W Louisville 5 1 1 20.0 78
La, E New Orleans 9 9 9 100.0 1
La, M Baton Rouge 6 5 5 83.3 5
La, W Shreveport 8 6 5 62.5 21
Maine Portland 6 2 2 33.3 68
Maryland Baltimore 35 19 18 51.4 35
Mass Boston 37 23 21 56.8 29
Mich, E Detroit 26 22 21 80.8 7
Mich, W Grand Rapids 16 9 7 43.8 48
MinnesotaMinneapolis 17 16 15 88.2 4
Miss, N Oxford 6 5 4 66.7 15
Miss, S Jackson 307 20 16 5.2 84
Mo, E St. Louis 38 10 10 26.3 75
Mo, W Kansas City 14 9 8 57.1 28
Montana Billings 7 3 3 42.9 50
Nebraska Omaha 11 4 4 36.4 64
Nevada Las Vegas 29 13 13 44.8 47
New Hamp Concord 0 0 0 - -
N. J. Newark 66 46 45 68.2 14
N Mexico Albuquerque 6 3 3 50.0 37
N. Y., N Syracuse 15 5 5 33.3 68
N. Y., E Brooklyn 75 45 35 46.7 44
N. Y., S Manhattan 55 34 19 34.5 65
N. Y., W Buffalo 24 12 12 50.0 37
N Car, E Raleigh 18 9 7 38.9 59
N Car, M Greensboro 13 6 5 38.5 60
N Car, W Asheville 10 7 7 70.0 11
N Dakota Fargo 3 3 3 100.0 1
Ohio, N Cleveland 72 43 43 59.7 25
Ohio, S Cincinnati 41 25 21 51.2 36
Okla, N Tulsa 32 4 3 9.4 82
Okla, E Muskogee 1 0 0 0.0 85
Okla, W Oklahoma City 14 8 7 50.0 37
Oregon Portland 27 9 6 22.2 76
Penn, E Philadelphia 56 30 28 50.0 37
Penn, M Scranton 17 8 8 47.1 43
Penn, W Pittsburgh 27 11 11 40.7 53
R. I. Providence 9 5 5 55.6 31
S Car Columbia 23 16 15 65.2 18
S Dakota Sioux Falls 1 0 0 0.0 85
Tenn, E Knoxville 10 5 4 40.0 54
Tenn, M Nashville 12 8 6 50.0 37
Tenn, W Memphis 33 30 27 81.8 6
Texas, N Fort Worth 76 31 28 36.8 62
Texas, E Tyler 25 9 8 32.0 74
Texas, S Houston 33 11 11 33.3 68
Texas, W San Antonio 27 19 17 63.0 20
Utah Salt Lake City 5 2 2 40.0 54
Vermont Burlington 5 0 0 0.0 85
Virg, E Alexandria 80 36 27 33.8 67
Virg, W Roanoke 34 28 22 64.7 19
Wash, E Spokane 2 1 1 50.0 37
Wash, W Seattle 27 16 15 55.6 31
W Virg, NWheeling 12 2 2 16.7 80
W Virg, SCharleston 24 12 10 41.7 52
Wisc, E Milwaukee 33 24 24 72.7 9
Wisc, W Madison 3 3 1 33.3 68
Wyoming Cheyenne 8 3 3 37.5 61

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010