Percent of IRS Criminal Convictions Under U.S. Attorney Program Categories 2005
Districts in Alphabetical Order -- Tax Fraud


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

Non-TaxTax-Fraud
DistrictCityTotal ReferralsPercentRankPercentRank
U.S. 1,086 47.1 - 52.9 -
Ala, N Birmingham 2 0.0 69 100.0 1
Ala, M Montgomery 0 - - - -
Ala, S Mobile 6 50.0 25 50.0 52
Alaska Anchorage 21 90.5 4 9.5 81
Arizona Phoenix 18 61.1 17 38.9 68
Ark, E Little Rock 10 40.0 36 60.0 46
Ark, W Fort Smith 0 - - - -
Cal, N San Francisco 10 40.0 36 60.0 46
Cal, C Los Angeles 56 23.2 58 76.8 27
Cal, E Sacramento 32 25.0 54 75.0 28
Cal, S San Diego 9 33.3 45 66.7 37
Colorado Denver 10 80.0 6 20.0 78
Conn New Haven 16 25.0 54 75.0 28
Delaware Wilmington 10 20.0 60 80.0 23
D. C. Washington 2 50.0 25 50.0 52
Fla, N Pensacola 7 57.1 21 42.9 62
Fla, M Tampa 21 38.1 41 61.9 44
Fla, S Miami 49 36.7 43 63.3 42
Ga, N Atlanta 14 42.9 35 57.1 50
Ga, M Macon 1 0.0 69 100.0 1
Ga, S Savannah 3 0.0 69 100.0 1
Hawaii Honolulu 8 12.5 66 87.5 18
Idaho Boise 4 50.0 25 50.0 52
Ill, N Chicago 43 58.1 20 41.9 65
Ill, S East St. Louis 3 33.3 45 66.7 37
Ill, C Springfield 2 100.0 1 0.0 83
Ind, N South Bend 11 63.6 15 36.4 70
Ind, S Indianapolis 11 36.4 44 63.6 41
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 4 50.0 25 50.0 52
Iowa, S Des Moines 1 0.0 69 100.0 1
Kansas Topeka 5 20.0 60 80.0 23
Ken, E Lexington 8 0.0 69 100.0 1
Ken, W Louisville 1 0.0 69 100.0 1
La, E New Orleans 9 22.2 59 77.8 26
La, M Baton Rouge 5 20.0 60 80.0 23
La, W Shreveport 5 0.0 69 100.0 1
Maine Portland 2 50.0 25 50.0 52
Maryland Baltimore 18 27.8 52 72.2 33
Mass Boston 21 57.1 21 42.9 62
Mich, E Detroit 21 52.4 24 47.6 61
Mich, W Grand Rapids 7 57.1 21 42.9 62
MinnesotaMinneapolis 15 46.7 34 53.3 51
Miss, N Oxford 4 25.0 54 75.0 28
Miss, S Jackson 16 68.8 12 31.3 73
Mo, E St. Louis 10 40.0 36 60.0 46
Mo, W Kansas City 8 12.5 66 87.5 18
Montana Billings 3 0.0 69 100.0 1
Nebraska Omaha 4 0.0 69 100.0 1
Nevada Las Vegas 13 7.7 68 92.3 17
New Hamp Concord 0 - - - -
N. J. Newark 45 33.3 45 66.7 37
N Mexico Albuquerque 3 0.0 69 100.0 1
N. Y., N Syracuse 5 0.0 69 100.0 1
N. Y., E Brooklyn 35 60.0 18 40.0 67
N. Y., S Manhattan 19 31.6 50 68.4 35
N. Y., W Buffalo 12 50.0 25 50.0 52
N Car, E Raleigh 7 14.3 65 85.7 20
N Car, M Greensboro 5 40.0 36 60.0 46
N Car, W Asheville 7 100.0 1 0.0 83
N Dakota Fargo 3 33.3 45 66.7 37
Ohio, N Cleveland 43 72.1 10 27.9 75
Ohio, S Cincinnati 21 66.7 13 33.3 71
Okla, N Tulsa 3 0.0 69 100.0 1
Okla, E Muskogee 0 - - - -
Okla, W Oklahoma City 7 28.6 51 71.4 34
Oregon Portland 6 66.7 13 33.3 71
Penn, E Philadelphia 28 32.1 49 67.9 36
Penn, M Scranton 8 37.5 42 62.5 43
Penn, W Pittsburgh 11 18.2 63 81.8 22
R. I. Providence 5 80.0 6 20.0 78
S Car Columbia 15 26.7 53 73.3 32
S Dakota Sioux Falls 0 - - - -
Tenn, E Knoxville 4 25.0 54 75.0 28
Tenn, M Nashville 6 16.7 64 83.3 21
Tenn, W Memphis 27 74.1 8 25.9 77
Texas, N Fort Worth 28 39.3 40 60.7 45
Texas, E Tyler 8 50.0 25 50.0 52
Texas, S Houston 11 72.7 9 27.3 76
Texas, W San Antonio 17 70.6 11 29.4 74
Utah Salt Lake City 2 0.0 69 100.0 1
Vermont Burlington 0 - - - -
Virg, E Alexandria 27 63.0 16 37.0 69
Virg, W Roanoke 22 86.4 5 13.6 80
Wash, E Spokane 1 0.0 69 100.0 1
Wash, W Seattle 15 93.3 3 6.7 82
W Virg, NWheeling 2 50.0 25 50.0 52
W Virg, SCharleston 10 50.0 25 50.0 52
Wisc, E Milwaukee 24 58.3 19 41.7 66
Wisc, W Madison 1 0.0 69 100.0 1
Wyoming Cheyenne 3 0.0 69 100.0 1
Note: Tax-fraud cases are defined as program category 033.


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010