Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2001 Districts in Alphabetical Order

(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

District	City	# Referrals Disposed of	# Prosecutions Completed	# Convicted	Percent of Referrals Convicted	Rank
U.S.		2,511	1,276	1,121	44.6	-
Ala, N	Birmingham	13	6	6	46.2	44
Ala, M	Montgomery	1	1	1	100.0	1
Ala, S	Mobile	12	2	2	16.7	82
Alaska	Anchorage	9	3	3	33.3	69
Arizona	Phoenix	25	15	11	44.0	47
Ark, E	Little Rock	18	5	5	27.8	74
Ark, W	Fort Smith	3	0	0	0.0	86
Cal, N	San Francisco	66	27	25	37.9	61
Cal, C	Los Angeles	216	66	47	21.8	80
Cal, E	Sacramento	55	34	32	58.2	22
Cal, S	San Diego	21	17	13	61.9	17
Colorado	Denver	30	12	11	36.7	63
Conn	New Haven	22	19	19	86.4	6
Delaware	Wilmington	8	3	3	37.5	62
D. C.	Washington	2	1	1	50.0	37
Fla, N	Pensacola	7	3	2	28.6	73
Fla, M	Tampa	75	31	30	40.0	59
Fla, S	Miami	79	53	43	54.4	30
Ga, N	Atlanta	31	15	13	41.9	54
Ga, M	Macon	16	4	4	25.0	76
Ga, S	Savannah	12	10	8	66.7	12
Hawaii	Honolulu	23	13	13	56.5	26
Idaho	Boise	12	5	5	41.7	55
Ill, N	Chicago	63	35	33	52.4	34
Ill, S	East St. Louis	11	6	4	36.4	64
Ill, C	Springfield	20	9	7	35.0	67
Ind, N	South Bend	27	12	11	40.7	57
Ind, S	Indianapolis	28	13	12	42.9	49
Iowa, N	Cedar Rapids	5	2	0	0.0	86
Iowa, S	Des Moines	6	4	4	66.7	12
Kansas	Topeka	12	6	6	50.0	37
Ken, E	Lexington	15	7	7	46.7	43
Ken, W	Louisville	13	6	6	46.2	44
La, E	New Orleans	9	5	5	55.6	28
La, M	Baton Rouge	5	2	2	40.0	59
La, W	Shreveport	3	3	3	100.0	1
Maine	Portland	6	3	3	50.0	37
Maryland	Baltimore	44	16	16	36.4	64
Mass	Boston	38	21	20	52.6	32
Mich, E	Detroit	45	27	23	51.1	36
Mich, W	Grand Rapids	24	22	19	79.2	7
Minnesota	Minneapolis	39	25	25	64.1	16
Miss, N	Oxford	2	0	0	0.0	86
Miss, S	Jackson	6	4	4	66.7	12
Mo, E	St. Louis	15	10	8	53.3	31
Mo, W	Kansas City	19	13	11	57.9	23
Montana	Billings	5	5	3	60.0	20
Nebraska	Omaha	7	0	0	0.0	86
Nevada	Las Vegas	53	33	19	35.8	66
New Hamp	Concord	7	5	4	57.1	24
N. J.	Newark	91	57	55	60.4	19
N Mexico	Albuquerque	3	1	1	33.3	69
N. Y., N	Syracuse	25	13	13	52.0	35
N. Y., E	Brooklyn	68	55	50	73.5	8
N. Y., S	Manhattan	55	35	34	61.8	18
N. Y., W	Buffalo	21	13	12	57.1	24
N Car, E	Raleigh	23	13	11	47.8	42
N Car, M	Greensboro	36	27	26	72.2	9
N Car, W	Asheville	29	19	19	65.5	15
N Dakota	Fargo	1	1	1	100.0	1
Ohio, N	Cleveland	67	33	29	43.3	48
Ohio, S	Cincinnati	38	27	27	71.1	11
Okla, N	Tulsa	15	5	4	26.7	75
Okla, E	Muskogee	7	6	5	71.4	10
Okla, W	Oklahoma City	20	10	3	15.0	83
Oregon	Portland	23	8	7	30.4	71
Penn, E	Philadelphia	63	22	22	34.9	68
Penn, M	Scranton	19	11	10	52.6	32
Penn, W	Pittsburgh	64	37	36	56.3	27
R. I.	Providence	6	4	3	50.0	37
S Car	Columbia	35	16	16	45.7	46
S Dakota	Sioux Falls	4	3	2	50.0	37
Tenn, E	Knoxville	14	6	6	42.9	49
Tenn, M	Nashville	12	7	5	41.7	55
Tenn, W	Memphis	19	10	8	42.1	53
Texas, N	Fort Worth	82	30	24	29.3	72
Texas, E	Tyler	7	3	3	42.9	49
Texas, S	Houston	60	45	33	55.0	29
Texas, W	San Antonio	68	36	29	42.6	52
Utah	Salt Lake City	23	8	5	21.7	81
Vermont	Burlington	0	0	0	-	-
Virg, E	Alexandria	69	32	28	40.6	58
Virg, W	Roanoke	17	10	10	58.8	21
Wash, E	Spokane	8	1	1	12.5	84
Wash, W	Seattle	22	6	5	22.7	79
W Virg, N	Wheeling	5	5	5	100.0	1
W Virg, S	Charleston	40	1	1	2.5	85
Wisc, E	Milwaukee	40	11	10	25.0	76
Wisc, W	Madison	12	3	3	25.0	76
Wyoming	Cheyenne	5	5	5	100.0	1

'

---

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University Copyright 2006