Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2005 Districts in Rank Order

(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

District	City	# Referrals Disposed of	# Prosecutions Completed	# Convicted	Percent of Referrals Convicted	Rank
U.S.		38,775	35,323	33,363	86.0	-
Ala, S	Mobile	2	2	2	100.0	1
Virg, W	Roanoke	6	6	6	100.0	1
Wyoming	Cheyenne	22	22	22	100.0	1
N Dakota	Fargo	100	96	95	95.0	4
Wisc, E	Milwaukee	34	33	32	94.1	5
N Mexico	Albuquerque	1,810	1,741	1,666	92.0	6
Ohio, N	Cleveland	59	54	54	91.5	7
Oregon	Portland	187	178	171	91.4	8
Utah	Salt Lake City	233	230	213	91.4	8
Cal, E	Sacramento	168	163	153	91.1	10
S Dakota	Sioux Falls	53	52	48	90.6	11
Texas, S	Houston	19,157	17,940	17,307	90.3	12
Texas, W	San Antonio	3,195	3,103	2,885	90.3	12
N Car, E	Raleigh	41	37	37	90.2	14
Delaware	Wilmington	19	18	17	89.5	15
Iowa, S	Des Moines	110	101	98	89.1	16
Ga, M	Macon	9	9	8	88.9	17
Minnesota	Minneapolis	27	25	24	88.9	17
Kansas	Topeka	123	114	109	88.6	19
Mich, W	Grand Rapids	69	63	61	88.4	20
Ill, C	Springfield	25	24	22	88.0	21
Mo, E	St. Louis	47	41	41	87.2	22
Iowa, N	Cedar Rapids	96	85	83	86.5	23
Texas, N	Fort Worth	282	255	243	86.2	24
Virg, E	Alexandria	142	132	122	85.9	25
Ark, E	Little Rock	28	26	24	85.7	26
Arizona	Phoenix	4,288	3,768	3,666	85.5	27
Ill, S	East St. Louis	20	18	17	85.0	28
Nevada	Las Vegas	121	113	102	84.3	29
Nebraska	Omaha	82	74	69	84.1	30
Cal, S	San Diego	1,869	1,829	1,565	83.7	31
Texas, E	Tyler	91	79	75	82.4	32
N Car, M	Greensboro	100	96	82	82.0	33
Colorado	Denver	167	149	136	81.4	34
Cal, C	Los Angeles	986	899	802	81.3	35
Ga, N	Atlanta	185	164	149	80.5	36
Maine	Portland	51	44	41	80.4	37
Wash, W	Seattle	159	136	127	79.9	38
Fla, M	Tampa	535	446	423	79.1	39
N. Y., N	Syracuse	212	182	167	78.8	40
Ind, S	Indianapolis	14	11	11	78.6	41
Ark, W	Fort Smith	104	92	80	76.9	42
Ala, N	Birmingham	17	13	13	76.5	43
N. J.	Newark	148	127	113	76.4	44
Fla, S	Miami	638	516	487	76.3	45
Cal, N	San Francisco	191	156	144	75.4	46
Miss, S	Jackson	32	29	24	75.0	47
Penn, E	Philadelphia	109	88	80	73.4	48
Tenn, M	Nashville	41	33	30	73.2	49
Tenn, W	Memphis	11	9	8	72.7	50
Maryland	Baltimore	29	21	21	72.4	51
Ill, N	Chicago	127	102	91	71.7	52
N. Y., E	Brooklyn	109	97	78	71.6	53
Penn, W	Pittsburgh	34	27	24	70.6	54
Fla, N	Pensacola	13	10	9	69.2	55
Mass	Boston	58	47	40	69.0	56
S Car	Columbia	41	35	28	68.3	57
Tenn, E	Knoxville	49	33	33	67.3	58
R. I.	Providence	24	17	16	66.7	59
Wisc, W	Madison	9	6	6	66.7	59
Penn, M	Scranton	53	39	35	66.0	61
La, W	Shreveport	17	13	11	64.7	62
Vermont	Burlington	75	63	48	64.0	63
Idaho	Boise	95	70	59	62.1	64
N. Y., W	Buffalo	225	144	137	60.9	65
N. Y., S	Manhattan	262	179	153	58.4	66
Alaska	Anchorage	12	8	7	58.3	67
Ken, E	Lexington	55	41	32	58.2	68
Montana	Billings	64	43	36	56.3	69
Ohio, S	Cincinnati	44	23	22	50.0	70
N Car, W	Asheville	45	32	22	48.9	71
Mich, E	Detroit	148	128	72	48.6	72
Hawaii	Honolulu	15	11	7	46.7	73
Mo, W	Kansas City	85	45	37	43.5	74
Ind, N	South Bend	12	5	5	41.7	75
New Hamp	Concord	22	13	9	40.9	76
D. C.	Washington	5	5	2	40.0	77
Ken, W	Louisville	35	17	14	40.0	77
Okla, N	Tulsa	5	2	2	40.0	77
Wash, E	Spokane	248	125	98	39.5	80
La, M	Baton Rouge	6	2	2	33.3	81
Okla, E	Muskogee	3	2	1	33.3	81
W Virg, N	Wheeling	3	1	1	33.3	81
Okla, W	Oklahoma City	13	4	4	30.8	84
Conn	New Haven	28	8	7	25.0	85
W Virg, S	Charleston	4	2	1	25.0	85
La, E	New Orleans	64	15	11	17.2	87
Miss, N	Oxford	4	0	0	0.0	88
Ala, M	Montgomery	0	0	0	-	-
Ga, S	Savannah	0	0	0	-	-

'

---

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University Copyright 2006