Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals That Are Prosecuted 2005
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Prosecuted# DeclinedPercentRank
U.S. 38,062 3,452 91.7 -
Ala, N Birmingham 14 4 77.8 64
Ala, M Montgomery 12 0 100.0 1
Ala, S Mobile 1 0 100.0 1
Alaska Anchorage 8 4 66.7 73
Arizona Phoenix 4,957 520 90.5 32
Ark, E Little Rock 30 2 93.8 22
Ark, W Fort Smith 64 12 84.2 50
Cal, N San Francisco 146 35 80.7 57
Cal, C Los Angeles 779 87 90.0 36
Cal, E Sacramento 140 5 96.6 15
Cal, S San Diego 1,671 40 97.7 10
Colorado Denver 169 18 90.4 34
Conn New Haven 11 20 35.5 86
Delaware Wilmington 17 1 94.4 21
D. C. Washington 1 0 100.0 1
Fla, N Pensacola 20 3 87.0 47
Fla, M Tampa 425 89 82.7 54
Fla, S Miami 486 122 79.9 59
Ga, N Atlanta 194 21 90.2 35
Ga, M Macon 4 0 100.0 1
Ga, S Savannah 5 0 100.0 1
Hawaii Honolulu 6 4 60.0 76
Idaho Boise 88 25 77.9 63
Ill, N Chicago 95 25 79.2 60
Ill, S East St. Louis 29 2 93.5 24
Ill, C Springfield 31 1 96.9 14
Ind, N South Bend 22 7 75.9 68
Ind, S Indianapolis 10 3 76.9 66
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 82 11 88.2 43
Iowa, S Des Moines 126 9 93.3 26
Kansas Topeka 112 9 92.6 28
Ken, E Lexington 32 14 69.6 72
Ken, W Louisville 23 18 56.1 82
La, E New Orleans 23 49 31.9 88
La, M Baton Rouge 0 4 0.0 89
La, W Shreveport 6 4 60.0 76
Maine Portland 53 7 88.3 42
Maryland Baltimore 29 8 78.4 61
Mass Boston 54 11 83.1 53
Mich, E Detroit 108 20 84.4 49
Mich, W Grand Rapids 51 6 89.5 38
MinnesotaMinneapolis 26 2 92.9 27
Miss, N Oxford 2 4 33.3 87
Miss, S Jackson 31 3 91.2 29
Mo, E St. Louis 43 6 87.8 45
Mo, W Kansas City 62 40 60.8 75
Montana Billings 56 21 72.7 69
Nebraska Omaha 76 8 90.5 32
Nevada Las Vegas 137 8 94.5 20
New Hamp Concord 13 9 59.1 81
N. J. Newark 216 21 91.1 30
N Mexico Albuquerque 2,264 69 97.0 12
N. Y., N Syracuse 204 30 87.2 46
N. Y., E Brooklyn 99 12 89.2 40
N. Y., S Manhattan 264 83 76.1 67
N. Y., W Buffalo 121 81 59.9 80
N Car, E Raleigh 85 4 95.5 17
N Car, M Greensboro 73 4 94.8 19
N Car, W Asheville 101 13 88.6 41
N Dakota Fargo 95 4 96.0 16
Ohio, N Cleveland 51 5 91.1 30
Ohio, S Cincinnati 25 21 54.3 83
Okla, N Tulsa 0 3 0.0 89
Okla, E Muskogee 4 1 80.0 58
Okla, W Oklahoma City 9 9 50.0 84
Oregon Portland 180 9 95.2 18
Penn, E Philadelphia 89 21 80.9 56
Penn, M Scranton 60 14 81.1 55
Penn, W Pittsburgh 36 7 83.7 51
R. I. Providence 18 7 72.0 70
S Car Columbia 30 6 83.3 52
S Dakota Sioux Falls 66 1 98.5 9
Tenn, E Knoxville 27 16 62.8 74
Tenn, M Nashville 27 8 77.1 65
Tenn, W Memphis 17 2 89.5 38
Texas, N Fort Worth 236 27 89.7 37
Texas, E Tyler 87 12 87.9 44
Texas, S Houston 18,286 1,217 93.8 22
Texas, W San Antonio 3,670 92 97.6 11
Utah Salt Lake City 240 3 98.8 8
Vermont Burlington 43 12 78.2 62
Virg, E Alexandria 145 10 93.5 24
Virg, W Roanoke 15 0 100.0 1
Wash, E Spokane 115 123 48.3 85
Wash, W Seattle 138 23 85.7 48
W Virg, NWheeling 3 2 60.0 76
W Virg, SCharleston 3 2 60.0 76
Wisc, E Milwaukee 32 1 97.0 12
Wisc, W Madison 7 3 70.0 71
Wyoming Cheyenne 31 0 100.0 1
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2006