Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2004
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 35,398 33,188 31,208 88.2 -
Ala, N Birmingham 22 20 17 77.3 45
Ala, M Montgomery 2 2 2 100.0 1
Ala, S Mobile 2 2 2 100.0 1
Alaska Anchorage 20 15 14 70.0 58
Arizona Phoenix 2,574 2,353 2,217 86.1 30
Ark, E Little Rock 18 15 14 77.8 44
Ark, W Fort Smith 129 126 118 91.5 16
Cal, N San Francisco 210 176 162 77.1 46
Cal, C Los Angeles 757 655 574 75.8 49
Cal, E Sacramento 278 272 264 95.0 10
Cal, S San Diego 2,755 2,724 2,394 86.9 27
Colorado Denver 153 124 114 74.5 51
Conn New Haven 25 13 10 40.0 82
Delaware Wilmington 13 9 9 69.2 60
D. C. Washington 18 17 16 88.9 23
Fla, N Pensacola 6 4 4 66.7 63
Fla, M Tampa 320 246 223 69.7 59
Fla, S Miami 270 195 182 67.4 62
Ga, N Atlanta 213 200 183 85.9 31
Ga, M Macon 5 5 5 100.0 1
Ga, S Savannah 5 5 4 80.0 40
Hawaii Honolulu 28 7 5 17.9 88
Idaho Boise 176 101 98 55.7 73
Ill, N Chicago 107 102 95 88.8 24
Ill, S East St. Louis 17 17 16 94.1 12
Ill, C Springfield 24 23 20 83.3 36
Ind, N South Bend 3 3 3 100.0 1
Ind, S Indianapolis 10 9 9 90.0 21
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 125 113 109 87.2 26
Iowa, S Des Moines 71 68 64 90.1 20
Kansas Topeka 113 101 96 85.0 33
Ken, E Lexington 33 24 24 72.7 55
Ken, W Louisville 27 15 14 51.9 76
La, E New Orleans 30 23 22 73.3 54
La, M Baton Rouge 4 2 2 50.0 78
La, W Shreveport 24 20 14 58.3 71
Maine Portland 29 18 17 58.6 70
Maryland Baltimore 51 43 38 74.5 51
Mass Boston 67 48 42 62.7 65
Mich, E Detroit 141 119 50 35.5 83
Mich, W Grand Rapids 52 50 43 82.7 37
MinnesotaMinneapolis 20 13 11 55.0 74
Miss, N Oxford 8 5 4 50.0 78
Miss, S Jackson 25 23 22 88.0 25
Mo, E St. Louis 40 39 39 97.5 6
Mo, W Kansas City 83 58 39 47.0 81
Montana Billings 47 38 35 74.5 51
Nebraska Omaha 66 64 61 92.4 14
Nevada Las Vegas 159 152 130 81.8 39
New Hamp Concord 16 16 16 100.0 1
N. J. Newark 89 65 55 61.8 66
N Mexico Albuquerque 1,582 1,443 1,372 86.7 28
N. Y., N Syracuse 144 106 96 66.7 63
N. Y., E Brooklyn 106 102 91 85.8 32
N. Y., S Manhattan 222 157 133 59.9 68
N. Y., W Buffalo 239 149 124 51.9 76
N Car, E Raleigh 32 31 29 90.6 19
N Car, M Greensboro 57 56 52 91.2 17
N Car, W Asheville 38 36 26 68.4 61
N Dakota Fargo 111 109 108 97.3 7
Ohio, N Cleveland 69 25 24 34.8 84
Ohio, S Cincinnati 43 10 10 23.3 87
Okla, N Tulsa 14 6 4 28.6 86
Okla, E Muskogee 0 0 0 - -
Okla, W Oklahoma City 27 9 9 33.3 85
Oregon Portland 231 223 213 92.2 15
Penn, E Philadelphia 73 63 63 86.3 29
Penn, M Scranton 33 25 24 72.7 55
Penn, W Pittsburgh 21 15 12 57.1 72
R. I. Providence 17 13 13 76.5 48
S Car Columbia 67 51 50 74.6 50
S Dakota Sioux Falls 35 34 34 97.1 8
Tenn, E Knoxville 70 56 54 77.1 46
Tenn, M Nashville 45 29 27 60.0 67
Tenn, W Memphis 25 24 20 80.0 40
Texas, N Fort Worth 377 342 311 82.5 38
Texas, E Tyler 103 94 87 84.5 34
Texas, S Houston 17,474 17,136 16,518 94.5 11
Texas, W San Antonio 3,272 3,234 3,054 93.3 13
Utah Salt Lake City 185 179 165 89.2 22
Vermont Burlington 47 38 28 59.6 69
Virg, E Alexandria 147 127 117 79.6 42
Virg, W Roanoke 14 11 11 78.6 43
Wash, E Spokane 253 152 133 52.6 75
Wash, W Seattle 112 98 81 72.3 57
W Virg, NWheeling 0 0 0 - -
W Virg, SCharleston 8 4 4 50.0 78
Wisc, E Milwaukee 31 26 26 83.9 35
Wisc, W Madison 11 10 10 90.9 18
Wyoming Cheyenne 22 21 21 95.5 9
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2006