Percent of Immigration Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2003 Districts in Rank Order

(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

District	City	# Referrals Disposed of	# Prosecutions Completed	# Convicted	Percent of Referrals Convicted	Rank
U.S.		22,717	20,188	18,316	80.6	-
Ala, M	Montgomery	2	2	2	100.0	1
Ark, E	Little Rock	15	15	15	100.0	1
Fla, N	Pensacola	4	4	4	100.0	1
W Virg, N	Wheeling	1	1	1	100.0	1
W Virg, S	Charleston	1	1	1	100.0	1
Ill, C	Springfield	35	35	34	97.1	6
N Car, M	Greensboro	51	49	49	96.1	7
N Dakota	Fargo	50	49	48	96.0	8
Oregon	Portland	246	242	235	95.5	9
Iowa, S	Des Moines	63	60	60	95.2	10
Ark, W	Fort Smith	82	79	78	95.1	11
Wyoming	Cheyenne	29	28	27	93.1	12
Wisc, W	Madison	14	13	13	92.9	13
Ill, N	Chicago	116	109	107	92.2	14
Nebraska	Omaha	87	86	80	92.0	15
La, E	New Orleans	24	22	22	91.7	16
N Mexico	Albuquerque	1,941	1,867	1,771	91.2	17
Cal, E	Sacramento	392	377	355	90.6	18
Cal, S	San Diego	2,640	2,616	2,381	90.2	19
Mo, E	St. Louis	51	47	46	90.2	19
Ga, N	Atlanta	165	158	148	89.7	21
Texas, W	San Antonio	3,276	3,251	2,923	89.2	22
Conn	New Haven	17	15	15	88.2	23
Miss, S	Jackson	17	15	15	88.2	23
Mich, W	Grand Rapids	41	37	36	87.8	25
Iowa, N	Cedar Rapids	63	57	55	87.3	26
Texas, E	Tyler	59	56	51	86.4	27
Nevada	Las Vegas	246	228	211	85.8	28
Mass	Boston	53	48	45	84.9	29
Okla, W	Oklahoma City	13	11	11	84.6	30
D. C.	Washington	32	28	27	84.4	31
Idaho	Boise	101	91	85	84.2	32
Ind, S	Indianapolis	12	11	10	83.3	33
Utah	Salt Lake City	317	288	262	82.6	34
Virg, E	Alexandria	101	85	83	82.2	35
S Dakota	Sioux Falls	33	31	27	81.8	36
Arizona	Phoenix	3,271	2,719	2,647	80.9	37
N. Y., E	Brooklyn	157	146	127	80.9	37
N Car, E	Raleigh	26	25	21	80.8	39
Ga, M	Macon	10	8	8	80.0	40
Penn, W	Pittsburgh	15	12	12	80.0	40
R. I.	Providence	20	16	16	80.0	40
Texas, N	Fort Worth	427	367	336	78.7	43
Cal, C	Los Angeles	412	390	322	78.2	44
Fla, S	Miami	367	308	285	77.7	45
Minnesota	Minneapolis	40	32	31	77.5	46
N Car, W	Asheville	22	17	17	77.3	47
La, W	Shreveport	17	15	13	76.5	48
Tenn, M	Nashville	37	31	28	75.7	49
Texas, S	Houston	3,884	3,491	2,940	75.7	49
La, M	Baton Rouge	8	6	6	75.0	51
Kansas	Topeka	86	67	64	74.4	52
Wash, W	Seattle	108	99	80	74.1	53
Penn, E	Philadelphia	60	49	44	73.3	54
Wisc, E	Milwaukee	37	30	27	73.0	55
Fla, M	Tampa	269	210	196	72.9	56
Ill, S	East St. Louis	33	30	24	72.7	57
Mich, E	Detroit	60	53	43	71.7	58
N. Y., N	Syracuse	127	105	91	71.7	58
Montana	Billings	45	36	32	71.1	60
S Car	Columbia	204	195	142	69.6	61
Ala, N	Birmingham	25	18	17	68.0	62
Penn, M	Scranton	31	22	21	67.7	63
Ind, N	South Bend	3	2	2	66.7	64
Maryland	Baltimore	51	34	34	66.7	64
Colorado	Denver	160	113	104	65.0	66
N. Y., S	Manhattan	214	155	137	64.0	67
Cal, N	San Francisco	216	152	137	63.4	68
New Hamp	Concord	24	16	15	62.5	69
N. Y., W	Buffalo	160	110	99	61.9	70
Virg, W	Roanoke	13	10	8	61.5	71
Tenn, E	Knoxville	162	108	98	60.5	72
Mo, W	Kansas City	89	74	53	59.6	73
Ken, W	Louisville	33	21	19	57.6	74
Wash, E	Spokane	230	143	127	55.2	75
Delaware	Wilmington	15	8	8	53.3	76
Ken, E	Lexington	49	30	26	53.1	77
Alaska	Anchorage	17	10	9	52.9	78
Vermont	Burlington	53	35	28	52.8	79
N. J.	Newark	80	44	42	52.5	80
Maine	Portland	47	24	22	46.8	81
Ga, S	Savannah	11	11	5	45.5	82
Okla, N	Tulsa	12	5	5	41.7	83
Ohio, N	Cleveland	71	25	24	33.8	84
Tenn, W	Memphis	59	21	18	30.5	85
Hawaii	Honolulu	39	23	11	28.2	86
Miss, N	Oxford	9	1	1	11.1	87
Ohio, S	Cincinnati	155	9	9	5.8	88
Ala, S	Mobile	2	0	0	0.0	89
Okla, E	Muskogee	0	0	0	-	-

'

---

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University Copyright 2006