Percent of FBI Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2008
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 23,907 13,609 11,365 47.5 -
MinnesotaMinneapolis 184 151 145 78.8 1
S Car Columbia 440 338 313 71.1 2
Penn, M Scranton 266 211 188 70.7 3
Ala, S Mobile 149 108 103 69.1 4
Tenn, W Memphis 278 214 190 68.3 5
Fla, S Miami 696 514 455 65.4 6
Ill, C Springfield 153 105 99 64.7 7
Conn New Haven 337 248 213 63.2 8
N Car, W Asheville 322 235 201 62.4 9
Penn, E Philadelphia 387 247 235 60.7 10
N. J. Newark 649 497 389 59.9 11
La, E New Orleans 198 123 115 58.1 12
Wisc, E Milwaukee 206 135 118 57.3 13
N Car, M Greensboro 109 68 62 56.9 14
Wash, W Seattle 143 89 81 56.6 15
Cal, C Los Angeles 700 473 394 56.3 16
Ark, W Fort Smith 86 55 48 55.8 17
N. Y., S Manhattan 807 521 447 55.4 18
Texas, W San Antonio 474 311 257 54.2 19
Cal, S San Diego 276 204 149 54.0 20
D. C. Washington 228 155 123 53.9 21
Iowa, S Des Moines 65 47 35 53.8 22
Ill, N Chicago 720 434 385 53.5 23
Ohio, N Cleveland 667 404 353 52.9 24
Ken, E Lexington 265 166 140 52.8 25
Ohio, S Cincinnati 249 159 130 52.2 26
Maryland Baltimore 295 181 153 51.9 27
Tenn, E Knoxville 220 125 109 49.5 28
Texas, E Tyler 290 160 143 49.3 29
Ga, N Atlanta 501 330 246 49.1 30
Kansas Topeka 147 93 72 49.0 31
La, W Shreveport 206 116 100 48.5 32
Mo, E St. Louis 301 159 145 48.2 33
Penn, W Pittsburgh 256 143 123 48.0 34
Virg, E Alexandria 658 357 310 47.1 35
Alaska Anchorage 134 68 63 47.0 36
S Dakota Sioux Falls 292 152 136 46.6 37
Ind, N South Bend 155 82 72 46.5 38
Colorado Denver 209 115 97 46.4 39
Vermont Burlington 59 37 27 45.8 40
Wyoming Cheyenne 105 51 48 45.7 41
Mich, W Grand Rapids 229 140 104 45.4 42
Virg, W Roanoke 124 63 56 45.2 43
Hawaii Honolulu 133 83 60 45.1 44
Nebraska Omaha 149 74 67 45.0 45
Ala, N Birmingham 185 107 83 44.9 46
Texas, S Houston 328 174 147 44.8 47
N. Y., N Syracuse 184 86 82 44.6 48
Okla, W Oklahoma City 258 145 115 44.6 48
New Hamp Concord 68 33 30 44.1 50
N Car, E Raleigh 195 96 86 44.1 50
Ark, E Little Rock 264 138 116 43.9 52
N. Y., E Brooklyn 422 225 185 43.8 53
N Dakota Fargo 110 55 48 43.6 54
Utah Salt Lake City 300 163 129 43.0 55
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 24 11 10 41.7 56
La, M Baton Rouge 76 31 31 40.8 57
Ga, S Savannah 159 75 64 40.3 58
Texas, N Fort Worth 536 264 215 40.1 59
Fla, M Tampa 495 230 198 40.0 60
Ill, S East St. Louis 115 53 46 40.0 60
Okla, N Tulsa 98 44 39 39.8 62
N Mexico Albuquerque 302 153 120 39.7 63
Mass Boston 230 107 91 39.6 64
Arizona Phoenix 753 384 296 39.3 65
Montana Billings 329 168 129 39.2 66
Mich, E Detroit 416 264 160 38.5 67
Mo, W Kansas City 241 113 92 38.2 68
Wisc, W Madison 157 63 59 37.6 69
Ind, S Indianapolis 161 70 60 37.3 70
Oregon Portland 343 177 127 37.0 71
Cal, E Sacramento 346 156 127 36.7 72
W Virg, NWheeling 60 26 22 36.7 72
Cal, N San Francisco 474 209 172 36.3 74
Ga, M Macon 105 47 37 35.2 75
Nevada Las Vegas 326 179 113 34.7 76
Tenn, M Nashville 150 63 52 34.7 76
Maine Portland 47 18 16 34.0 78
Idaho Boise 125 51 41 32.8 79
N. Y., W Buffalo 284 132 92 32.4 80
Wash, E Spokane 190 63 56 29.5 81
Delaware Wilmington 38 12 11 28.9 82
Miss, N Oxford 116 35 32 27.6 83
Ala, M Montgomery 64 20 17 26.6 84
R. I. Providence 53 15 14 26.4 85
Fla, N Pensacola 152 48 40 26.3 86
Miss, S Jackson 414 129 103 24.9 87
Ken, W Louisville 230 67 56 24.3 88
Okla, E Muskogee 71 20 17 23.9 89
W Virg, SCharleston 210 44 23 11.0 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009