Percent of FBI Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2005
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 30,158 14,938 12,109 40.2 -
N Car, W Asheville 173 134 119 68.8 1
N Car, M Greensboro 172 115 110 64.0 2
MinnesotaMinneapolis 192 125 121 63.0 3
Tenn, W Memphis 256 176 158 61.7 4
Fla, S Miami 752 560 451 60.0 5
Conn New Haven 335 226 200 59.7 6
N. Y., E Brooklyn 588 457 351 59.7 6
La, E New Orleans 199 118 116 58.3 8
Penn, M Scranton 336 205 196 58.3 8
Penn, E Philadelphia 641 401 372 58.0 10
Ill, C Springfield 194 118 110 56.7 11
N. J. Newark 591 394 334 56.5 12
N Car, E Raleigh 186 114 104 55.9 13
Ohio, N Cleveland 859 545 475 55.3 14
Hawaii Honolulu 278 197 149 53.6 15
Wisc, W Madison 143 84 76 53.1 16
Miss, N Oxford 117 66 62 53.0 17
Utah Salt Lake City 242 166 128 52.9 18
S Car Columbia 469 293 247 52.7 19
Arizona Phoenix 522 317 267 51.1 20
Nebraska Omaha 189 107 96 50.8 21
Virg, E Alexandria 626 349 318 50.8 21
Ind, N South Bend 183 97 92 50.3 23
N. Y., W Buffalo 376 228 189 50.3 23
Wisc, E Milwaukee 151 85 75 49.7 25
N. Y., S Manhattan 859 503 426 49.6 26
D. C. Washington 286 157 138 48.3 27
Ohio, S Cincinnati 315 190 152 48.3 27
Cal, E Sacramento 387 229 186 48.1 29
Oregon Portland 333 205 160 48.0 30
Ark, W Fort Smith 104 65 49 47.1 31
Mich, W Grand Rapids 230 143 104 45.2 32
Cal, S San Diego 222 153 100 45.0 33
Okla, W Oklahoma City 231 133 102 44.2 34
Ga, N Atlanta 533 306 233 43.7 35
La, W Shreveport 361 181 154 42.7 36
Ill, S East St. Louis 120 63 51 42.5 37
Ala, S Mobile 170 78 72 42.4 38
Alaska Anchorage 118 59 50 42.4 38
Wash, W Seattle 260 138 110 42.3 40
Ala, N Birmingham 232 120 98 42.2 41
Montana Billings 372 185 157 42.2 41
Okla, N Tulsa 91 51 38 41.8 43
Ill, N Chicago 867 472 361 41.6 44
Fla, N Pensacola 122 65 50 41.0 45
Ga, S Savannah 115 52 47 40.9 46
Cal, C Los Angeles 1,145 696 458 40.0 47
Tenn, M Nashville 158 88 63 39.9 48
Virg, W Roanoke 106 55 41 38.7 49
Okla, E Muskogee 77 37 29 37.7 50
Ga, M Macon 109 51 41 37.6 51
New Hamp Concord 92 38 34 37.0 52
Maryland Baltimore 337 176 123 36.5 53
Mich, E Detroit 564 323 206 36.5 53
Mo, W Kansas City 303 131 109 36.0 55
Texas, E Tyler 420 163 144 34.3 56
N Dakota Fargo 120 53 41 34.2 57
Nevada Las Vegas 396 221 135 34.1 58
S Dakota Sioux Falls 564 225 191 33.9 59
Texas, W San Antonio 681 308 230 33.8 60
Colorado Denver 292 129 98 33.6 61
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 48 19 16 33.3 62
N Mexico Albuquerque 504 198 168 33.3 62
Texas, N Fort Worth 569 246 189 33.2 64
Ken, E Lexington 281 104 93 33.1 65
N. Y., N Syracuse 220 78 72 32.7 66
Maine Portland 46 18 15 32.6 67
Cal, N San Francisco 423 204 136 32.2 68
Delaware Wilmington 59 25 19 32.2 68
Wash, E Spokane 159 64 50 31.4 70
Iowa, S Des Moines 77 26 24 31.2 71
Mo, E St. Louis 429 174 132 30.8 72
Fla, M Tampa 742 283 228 30.7 73
Ken, W Louisville 180 68 55 30.6 74
Mass Boston 392 144 116 29.6 75
Ind, S Indianapolis 181 67 53 29.3 76
La, M Baton Rouge 87 37 25 28.7 77
Vermont Burlington 42 13 12 28.6 78
Ala, M Montgomery 57 23 16 28.1 79
Wyoming Cheyenne 93 30 26 28.0 80
Ark, E Little Rock 409 138 114 27.9 81
Texas, S Houston 442 153 122 27.6 82
R. I. Providence 128 37 28 21.9 83
Penn, W Pittsburgh 407 121 86 21.1 84
Miss, S Jackson 421 107 84 20.0 85
W Virg, NWheeling 102 23 20 19.6 86
Kansas Topeka 528 112 89 16.9 87
Tenn, E Knoxville 1,211 211 188 15.5 88
W Virg, SCharleston 294 55 39 13.3 89
Idaho Boise 815 66 50 6.1 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009