Percent of FBI Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2004
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 31,280 15,503 12,276 39.2 -
N Car, M Greensboro 142 96 90 63.4 1
Ill, C Springfield 177 115 108 61.0 2
MinnesotaMinneapolis 174 115 104 59.8 3
Penn, E Philadelphia 498 317 298 59.8 3
Virg, W Roanoke 91 60 54 59.3 5
N Car, W Asheville 302 219 171 56.6 6
N. Y., E Brooklyn 634 454 356 56.2 7
Hawaii Honolulu 265 174 148 55.8 8
S Car Columbia 470 316 262 55.7 9
Penn, M Scranton 364 218 202 55.5 10
N. J. Newark 495 309 269 54.3 11
Wisc, E Milwaukee 206 118 109 52.9 12
Cal, S San Diego 203 156 106 52.2 13
Nebraska Omaha 289 163 151 52.2 13
Tenn, W Memphis 192 119 100 52.1 15
New Hamp Concord 83 50 43 51.8 16
Colorado Denver 319 200 163 51.1 17
Ill, N Chicago 795 494 404 50.8 18
Montana Billings 397 237 199 50.1 19
Delaware Wilmington 36 25 18 50.0 20
Arizona Phoenix 559 348 277 49.6 21
Virg, E Alexandria 639 376 313 49.0 22
Ill, S East St. Louis 125 68 61 48.8 23
Ala, N Birmingham 295 175 142 48.1 24
Ind, N South Bend 172 99 82 47.7 25
Texas, E Tyler 561 304 262 46.7 26
La, W Shreveport 273 146 126 46.2 27
Tenn, M Nashville 115 67 53 46.1 28
Conn New Haven 336 198 153 45.5 29
Fla, S Miami 805 507 362 45.0 30
Wash, W Seattle 321 170 142 44.2 31
Fla, N Pensacola 112 54 49 43.8 32
Ohio, S Cincinnati 352 200 152 43.2 33
Utah Salt Lake City 359 223 154 42.9 34
N. Y., S Manhattan 964 548 412 42.7 35
Mich, W Grand Rapids 235 140 100 42.6 36
Texas, W San Antonio 566 289 241 42.6 36
Ala, M Montgomery 80 43 34 42.5 38
La, E New Orleans 224 101 94 42.0 39
Ga, N Atlanta 549 341 227 41.3 40
Ohio, N Cleveland 824 407 337 40.9 41
Wisc, W Madison 137 65 55 40.1 42
Maryland Baltimore 334 162 133 39.8 43
Iowa, S Des Moines 106 47 42 39.6 44
Texas, N Fort Worth 679 316 269 39.6 44
Oregon Portland 344 190 135 39.2 46
Wyoming Cheyenne 100 41 39 39.0 47
Nevada Las Vegas 393 220 153 38.9 48
Cal, E Sacramento 432 248 167 38.7 49
S Dakota Sioux Falls 454 203 175 38.5 50
Alaska Anchorage 106 49 40 37.7 51
Texas, S Houston 481 237 181 37.6 52
Penn, W Pittsburgh 318 132 115 36.2 53
Vermont Burlington 50 24 18 36.0 54
Ga, S Savannah 184 78 66 35.9 55
Mass Boston 285 118 102 35.8 56
Ga, M Macon 182 71 65 35.7 57
Cal, C Los Angeles 1,204 680 427 35.5 58
Okla, E Muskogee 93 44 33 35.5 58
Mo, W Kansas City 295 121 103 34.9 60
Ala, S Mobile 207 78 72 34.8 61
Mich, E Detroit 755 478 262 34.7 62
Wash, E Spokane 157 67 54 34.4 63
N. Y., W Buffalo 394 177 132 33.5 64
Ark, W Fort Smith 93 43 31 33.3 65
Cal, N San Francisco 559 244 184 32.9 66
N Car, E Raleigh 258 98 85 32.9 66
R. I. Providence 85 28 28 32.9 66
Okla, N Tulsa 97 51 31 32.0 69
D. C. Washington 474 177 147 31.0 70
Ken, E Lexington 250 110 77 30.8 71
N Dakota Fargo 172 60 53 30.8 71
N. Y., N Syracuse 275 89 82 29.8 73
Ind, S Indianapolis 243 84 69 28.4 74
N Mexico Albuquerque 574 198 163 28.4 74
Fla, M Tampa 778 280 215 27.6 76
Ken, W Louisville 225 69 62 27.6 76
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 95 34 26 27.4 78
La, M Baton Rouge 81 33 22 27.2 79
Okla, W Oklahoma City 266 93 72 27.1 80
Tenn, E Knoxville 717 209 178 24.8 81
Maine Portland 89 23 21 23.6 82
Ark, E Little Rock 462 132 106 22.9 83
Mo, E St. Louis 454 150 101 22.2 84
Kansas Topeka 538 138 115 21.4 85
W Virg, NWheeling 91 19 16 17.6 86
Miss, N Oxford 186 43 30 16.1 87
Miss, S Jackson 641 128 97 15.1 88
W Virg, SCharleston 256 41 32 12.5 89
Idaho Boise 563 80 66 11.7 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009