Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals That Are Prosecuted 1999
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)

DistrictCity# Prosecuted# DeclinedPercentRank
U.S. 4,282 2,991 58.9 -
Ala, N Birmingham 36 23 61.0 47
Ala, M Montgomery 2 3 40.0 74
Ala, S Mobile 21 18 53.8 59
Alaska Anchorage 12 2 85.7 10
Arizona Phoenix 45 14 76.3 21
Ark, E Little Rock 23 288 7.4 89
Ark, W Fort Smith 3 6 33.3 79
Cal, N San Francisco 110 6 94.8 1
Cal, C Los Angeles 49 69 41.5 72
Cal, E Sacramento 25 13 65.8 43
Cal, S San Diego 10 1 90.9 6
Colorado Denver 37 45 45.1 68
Conn New Haven 30 6 83.3 14
Delaware Wilmington 8 15 34.8 77
D. C. Washington 22 8 73.3 26
Fla, N Pensacola 29 66 30.5 82
Fla, M Tampa 69 74 48.3 63
Fla, S Miami 117 52 69.2 34
Ga, N Atlanta 65 27 70.7 31
Ga, M Macon 13 5 72.2 29
Ga, S Savannah 23 6 79.3 19
Hawaii Honolulu 8 1 88.9 7
Idaho Boise 0 222 0.0 90
Ill, N Chicago 37 29 56.1 54
Ill, S East St. Louis 29 12 70.7 31
Ill, C Springfield 13 9 59.1 52
Ind, N South Bend 63 50 55.8 55
Ind, S Indianapolis 41 145 22.0 87
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 16 3 84.2 13
Iowa, S Des Moines 26 9 74.3 25
Kansas Topeka 32 12 72.7 27
Ken, E Lexington 59 177 25.0 86
Ken, W Louisville 32 21 60.4 49
La, E New Orleans 78 14 84.8 12
La, M Baton Rouge 95 7 93.1 3
La, W Shreveport 19 30 38.8 76
Maine Portland 18 15 54.5 58
Maryland Baltimore 124 47 72.5 28
Mass Boston 52 17 75.4 23
Mich, E Detroit 184 59 75.7 22
Mich, W Grand Rapids 27 16 62.8 45
MinnesotaMinneapolis 27 16 62.8 45
Miss, N Oxford 6 13 31.6 81
Miss, S Jackson 14 18 43.8 70
Mo, E St. Louis 99 50 66.4 41
Mo, W Kansas City 29 41 41.4 73
Montana Billings 8 2 80.0 17
Nebraska Omaha 29 29 50.0 61
Nevada Las Vegas 58 48 54.7 57
New Hamp Concord 17 14 54.8 56
N. J. Newark 72 34 67.9 39
N Mexico Albuquerque 51 7 87.9 8
N. Y., N Syracuse 18 27 40.0 74
N. Y., E Brooklyn 63 4 94.0 2
N. Y., S Manhattan 89 14 86.4 9
N. Y., W Buffalo 91 45 66.9 40
N Car, E Raleigh 62 27 69.7 33
N Car, M Greensboro 56 14 80.0 17
N Car, W Asheville 122 26 82.4 15
N Dakota Fargo 22 10 68.8 37
Ohio, N Cleveland 57 65 46.7 65
Ohio, S Cincinnati 30 60 33.3 79
Okla, N Tulsa 21 59 26.3 84
Okla, E Muskogee 10 12 45.5 66
Okla, W Oklahoma City 16 9 64.0 44
Oregon Portland 94 38 71.2 30
Penn, E Philadelphia 212 47 81.9 16
Penn, M Scranton 32 21 60.4 49
Penn, W Pittsburgh 7 16 30.4 83
R. I. Providence 23 16 59.0 53
S Car Columbia 97 29 77.0 20
S Dakota Sioux Falls 10 12 45.5 66
Tenn, E Knoxville 63 29 68.5 38
Tenn, M Nashville 28 19 59.6 51
Tenn, W Memphis 37 3 92.5 4
Texas, N Fort Worth 85 44 65.9 42
Texas, E Tyler 52 65 44.4 69
Texas, S Houston 114 51 69.1 35
Texas, W San Antonio 111 50 68.9 36
Utah Salt Lake City 17 11 60.7 48
Vermont Burlington 8 15 34.8 77
Virg, E Alexandria 272 25 91.6 5
Virg, W Roanoke 72 24 75.0 24
Wash, E Spokane 29 40 42.0 71
Wash, W Seattle 20 59 25.3 85
W Virg, NWheeling 11 10 52.4 60
W Virg, SCharleston 27 28 49.1 62
Wisc, E Milwaukee 30 33 47.6 64
Wisc, W Madison 2 13 13.3 88
Wyoming Cheyenne 18 3 85.7 10
'


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2003