Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals That Are Prosecuted 2008
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Prosecuted# DeclinedPercentRank
U.S. 9,882 4,252 69.9 -
Kansas Topeka 139 6 95.9 1
Cal, C Los Angeles 182 11 94.3 2
Delaware Wilmington 78 6 92.9 3
D. C. Washington 13 1 92.9 3
N. Y., S Manhattan 120 15 88.9 5
Ala, S Mobile 86 12 87.8 6
Wyoming Cheyenne 67 10 87.0 7
N. Y., E Brooklyn 99 17 85.3 8
Ind, N South Bend 182 32 85.0 9
N Car, M Greensboro 211 40 84.1 10
MinnesotaMinneapolis 89 17 84.0 11
Ala, M Montgomery 66 13 83.5 12
Cal, E Sacramento 132 26 83.5 12
Okla, W Oklahoma City 40 8 83.3 14
W Virg, NWheeling 96 20 82.8 15
Mich, E Detroit 206 44 82.4 16
Ala, N Birmingham 161 35 82.1 17
N Car, W Asheville 136 30 81.9 18
Hawaii Honolulu 22 5 81.5 19
Texas, E Tyler 169 39 81.3 20
S Car Columbia 394 93 80.9 21
Tenn, M Nashville 82 20 80.4 22
N Mexico Albuquerque 68 17 80.0 23
N. Y., N Syracuse 58 15 79.5 24
Wash, W Seattle 77 20 79.4 25
Colorado Denver 102 29 77.9 26
Ark, E Little Rock 56 16 77.8 27
Cal, S San Diego 42 12 77.8 27
Ga, N Atlanta 133 39 77.3 29
N Car, E Raleigh 256 76 77.1 30
Nebraska Omaha 40 12 76.9 31
Virg, W Roanoke 170 52 76.6 32
Penn, M Scranton 52 16 76.5 33
Ohio, S Cincinnati 177 58 75.3 34
Virg, E Alexandria 397 131 75.2 35
Mich, W Grand Rapids 90 30 75.0 36
Ken, E Lexington 158 55 74.2 37
Ark, W Fort Smith 20 7 74.1 38
La, W Shreveport 60 21 74.1 38
Mass Boston 71 25 74.0 40
Ga, S Savannah 163 59 73.4 41
Texas, S Houston 283 104 73.1 42
Ill, N Chicago 124 46 72.9 43
Wisc, W Madison 21 8 72.4 44
Fla, S Miami 276 109 71.7 45
Okla, E Muskogee 32 13 71.1 46
Texas, N Fort Worth 177 72 71.1 46
Mo, W Kansas City 243 103 70.2 48
Okla, N Tulsa 92 39 70.2 48
N. Y., W Buffalo 122 52 70.1 50
Texas, W San Antonio 171 73 70.1 50
Iowa, S Des Moines 93 40 69.9 52
Tenn, E Knoxville 185 82 69.3 53
N. J. Newark 57 27 67.9 54
S Dakota Sioux Falls 38 18 67.9 54
Maryland Baltimore 231 117 66.4 56
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 43 22 66.2 57
Montana Billings 66 35 65.3 58
La, E New Orleans 57 31 64.8 59
Tenn, W Memphis 236 129 64.7 60
Oregon Portland 56 31 64.4 61
Alaska Anchorage 27 15 64.3 62
Ohio, N Cleveland 146 82 64.0 63
Penn, E Philadelphia 195 111 63.7 64
Vermont Burlington 50 30 62.5 65
Mo, E St. Louis 157 98 61.6 66
Penn, W Pittsburgh 90 57 61.2 67
Ken, W Louisville 96 61 61.1 68
Conn New Haven 71 46 60.7 69
Arizona Phoenix 134 89 60.1 70
Ill, C Springfield 34 23 59.6 71
Fla, M Tampa 247 172 58.9 72
Miss, S Jackson 87 61 58.8 73
N Dakota Fargo 37 26 58.7 74
Cal, N San Francisco 64 47 57.7 75
La, M Baton Rouge 65 49 57.0 76
Utah Salt Lake City 147 116 55.9 77
Ind, S Indianapolis 43 35 55.1 78
Ga, M Macon 36 30 54.5 79
Idaho Boise 63 57 52.5 80
Fla, N Pensacola 33 32 50.8 81
Wisc, E Milwaukee 65 63 50.8 81
New Hamp Concord 12 14 46.2 83
R. I. Providence 17 21 44.7 84
Wash, E Spokane 63 80 44.1 85
W Virg, SCharleston 18 23 43.9 86
Ill, S East St. Louis 37 52 41.6 87
Miss, N Oxford 37 58 38.9 88
Maine Portland 65 133 32.8 89
Nevada Las Vegas 56 221 20.2 90


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009