Graphical Highlights
 
Nationality and Court-by-Court Disparity in Asylum Decisions: Examining the Extremes
Before and After the Attorney General's Directive

        FY 2004 - FY 2006 FY 2007 - FY 2009 Change in Disparity
Nationality Immigration
Court
    Judge Denial Rates Judge Denial Rates Before vs After AG's Directive
Decisions Judges Lowest Highest Range Lowest Highest Range Amount
of
Change
Source
of
Change
China All 27,409 80 6.6% 100.0% 93.4 3.7% 89.5% 85.8  
Los Angeles 2,829 23 24.8% 89.7% 64.9 11.8% 77.6% 65.8 0.9
Newark 1,331 6 16.9% 61.7% 44.8 37.4% 73.2% 35.8 -9.0 change in decisions
New York 20,136 28 8.0% 90.5% 82.5 3.7% 68.7% 65.0 -17.5 change in decisions
Colombia All 10,830 32 21.0% 97.2% 76.2 15.8% 90.9% 75.1  
Miami 8,149 23 21.0% 97.2% 76.2 46.9% 90.9% 44.0 -32.2 offsetting trends (A)
Orlando 2,294 4 40.2% 88.6% 48.4 15.8% 84.6% 68.8 20.4 offsetting trends (B)
Ethiopia All 1,560 6 26.6% 50.4% 23.8 8.5% 55.0% 46.5  
Baltimore 958 4 26.6% 50.4% 23.8 30.4% 55.0% 24.6 0.8
Haiti All 13,600 31 13.6% 100.0% 86.4 56.1% 97.0% 40.9  
Miami 11,104 24 31.2% 97.9% 66.7 57.7% 97.0% 39.3 -27.4 change in judges
India All 2,420 17 21.7% 92.9% 71.2 21.2% 65.7% 44.5  
San Francisco 2,282 16 21.7% 92.9% 71.2 21.2% 65.7% 44.5 -26.7 change in decisions
Venezuela All 2,403 17 16.4% 100.0% 83.6 17.7% 82.8% 65.1  
Miami 1,935 15 16.4% 100.0% 83.6 44.8% 77.8% 33.0 -50.6 change in judges

offsetting trends (A): change in decisions increase disparity; change in judges lessen disparity
offsetting trends (B): change in decisions lessen disparity; change in judges increase disparity


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009