Graphical Highlights
 
Court-by-Court Disparity in Asylum Decisions: Examining the Middle Fifty Percent of Judges
Before and After the Attorney General's Directive

      FY 2004 - FY 2006 FY 2007 - FY 2009 Change in Disparity for Middle 50% of Judges
Immigration
Court
    Denial Rates for
Middle 50% of Judges
Denial Rates for
Middle 50% of Judges
Before vs After AG's Directive
Decisions Judges Low (25th
Percentile)
High (75th
Percentile)
Middle
Range
Low (25th
Percentile)
High (75th
Percentile)
Middle
Range
Amount
of
Change
Source of Change
New York 38,964 28 22.8% 54.9% 32.1 14.1% 33.8% 19.7 -12.4 change in decisions
Miami 27,028 25 77.9% 89.7% 11.8 73.5% 84.4% 10.9 -0.9  
Los Angeles 13,582 27 47.2% 75.2% 28.0 54.8% 66.9% 12.1 -15.9 change in decisions
San Francisco 10,882 22 45.3% 71.4% 26.1 45.6% 68.0% 22.4 -3.7 offseting trends (A)
Orlando 6,264 5 44.1% 78.7% 34.6 46.9% 75.3% 28.4 -6.2 offsetting trends (B)
Baltimore 5,275 5 52.5% 57.7% 5.2 51.8% 56.5% 4.7 -0.5  
Newark 4,512 7 38.0% 82.5% 44.5 51.5% 69.9% 18.4 -26.1 change in decisions and judges
Boston 3,645 6 56.2% 64.4% 8.2 52.9% 62.1% 9.2 1.0  
Arlington 3,096 6 42.8% 66.3% 23.5 24.0% 44.7% 20.7 -2.8 offsetting trends (A)
Philadelphia 3,008 4 74.4% 85.0% 10.6 36.3% 62.6% 26.3 15.7 change in decisions increase disparity
Chicago 2,976 7 34.4% 59.0% 24.6 32.3% 52.2% 19.9 -4.7 change in judges
San Diego 2,403 8 51.3% 70.2% 18.9 23.9% 41.7% 17.8 -1.1 offseting trends (A)
Houston 2,323 6 77.3% 81.5% 4.2 80.6% 91.9% 11.3 7.1 change in judges increase disparity
Cleveland 1,948 7 55.2% 73.6% 18.4 47.5% 80.4% 32.9 14.5 offseting trends (A)
Atlanta 1,425 5 83.7% 87.9% 4.2 81.1% 93.3% 12.2 8.0 change in decisions increase disparity

offsetting trends (A): change in decisions increase disparity; change in judges lessen disparity
offsetting trends (B): change in decisions lessen disparity; change in judges increase disparity


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009