Graphical Highlights
 
Court-by-Court Disparity in Asylum Decisions: Examining the Extremes
Before and After the Attorney General's Directive

      FY 2004 - FY 2006 FY 2007 - FY 2009 Change in Disparity
Immigration
Court
    Judge Denial Rates Judge Denial Rates Before vs After AG's Directive
Decisions Judges Lowest Highest Range Lowest Highest Range Amount
of
Change
Source of Change
New York 38,964 28 6.7% 87.6% 80.9 5.2% 66.5% 61.3 -19.6 change in decisions
Miami 27,028 25 24.5% 97.8% 73.3 65.3% 90.5% 25.2 -48.1 change in judges
Los Angeles 13,582 27 33.0% 86.9% 53.9 36.6% 84.0% 47.4 -6.5 change in decisions
San Francisco 10,882 22 33.0% 91.0% 58.0 39.5% 85.0% 45.5 -12.5 change in decisions
Orlando 6,264 5 41.2% 84.3% 43.1 28.0% 81.3% 53.3 10.2 offsetting trends (B)
Baltimore 5,275 5 41.0% 67.3% 26.3 50.8% 68.6% 17.8 -8.5 change in decisions
Newark 4,512 7 36.5% 82.9% 46.4 51.1% 74.2% 23.1 -23.3 change in decisions and judges
Boston 3,645 6 37.6% 70.1% 32.5 51.4% 64.0% 12.6 -19.9 change in judges
Arlington 3,096 6 33.6% 75.9% 42.3 16.1% 52.5% 36.4 -5.9 change in judges
Philadelphia 3,008 4 69.0% 88.3% 19.3 36.3% 62.6% 26.3 7.0 offsetting trends (A)
Chicago 2,976 7 11.8% 73.5% 61.7 18.1% 60.5% 42.4 -19.3 change in decisions
San Diego 2,403 8 30.2% 75.4% 45.2 15.9% 53.1% 37.2 -8.0 change in decisions
Houston 2,323 6 72.4% 87.7% 15.3 75.3% 100.0% 24.7 9.4 change in judges increase disparity
Cleveland 1,948 7 32.0% 81.3% 49.3 24.5% 87.4% 62.9 13.6 offsetting trends (A)
Atlanta 1,425 5 76.2% 97.4% 21.2 75.5% 95.7% 20.2 -1.0 offsetting trends (A)

offsetting trends (A): change in decisions increase disparity; change in judges lessen disparity
offsetting trends (B): change in decisions lessen disparity; change in judges increase disparity


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009