|
Court-by-Court Disparity in Asylum Decisions: Examining the Extremes Before and After the Attorney General's Directive |
FY 2004 - FY 2006 | FY 2007 - FY 2009 | Change in Disparity | ||||||||
Immigration Court |
Judge Denial Rates | Judge Denial Rates | Before vs After AG's Directive | |||||||
Decisions | Judges | Lowest | Highest | Range | Lowest | Highest | Range | Amount of Change |
Source of Change | |
New York | 38,964 | 28 | 6.7% | 87.6% | 80.9 | 5.2% | 66.5% | 61.3 | -19.6 | change in decisions |
Miami | 27,028 | 25 | 24.5% | 97.8% | 73.3 | 65.3% | 90.5% | 25.2 | -48.1 | change in judges |
Los Angeles | 13,582 | 27 | 33.0% | 86.9% | 53.9 | 36.6% | 84.0% | 47.4 | -6.5 | change in decisions |
San Francisco | 10,882 | 22 | 33.0% | 91.0% | 58.0 | 39.5% | 85.0% | 45.5 | -12.5 | change in decisions |
Orlando | 6,264 | 5 | 41.2% | 84.3% | 43.1 | 28.0% | 81.3% | 53.3 | 10.2 | offsetting trends (B) |
Baltimore | 5,275 | 5 | 41.0% | 67.3% | 26.3 | 50.8% | 68.6% | 17.8 | -8.5 | change in decisions |
Newark | 4,512 | 7 | 36.5% | 82.9% | 46.4 | 51.1% | 74.2% | 23.1 | -23.3 | change in decisions and judges |
Boston | 3,645 | 6 | 37.6% | 70.1% | 32.5 | 51.4% | 64.0% | 12.6 | -19.9 | change in judges |
Arlington | 3,096 | 6 | 33.6% | 75.9% | 42.3 | 16.1% | 52.5% | 36.4 | -5.9 | change in judges |
Philadelphia | 3,008 | 4 | 69.0% | 88.3% | 19.3 | 36.3% | 62.6% | 26.3 | 7.0 | offsetting trends (A) |
Chicago | 2,976 | 7 | 11.8% | 73.5% | 61.7 | 18.1% | 60.5% | 42.4 | -19.3 | change in decisions |
San Diego | 2,403 | 8 | 30.2% | 75.4% | 45.2 | 15.9% | 53.1% | 37.2 | -8.0 | change in decisions |
Houston | 2,323 | 6 | 72.4% | 87.7% | 15.3 | 75.3% | 100.0% | 24.7 | 9.4 | change in judges increase disparity |
Cleveland | 1,948 | 7 | 32.0% | 81.3% | 49.3 | 24.5% | 87.4% | 62.9 | 13.6 | offsetting trends (A) |
Atlanta | 1,425 | 5 | 76.2% | 97.4% | 21.2 | 75.5% | 95.7% | 20.2 | -1.0 | offsetting trends (A) |
offsetting trends (A): change in decisions increase disparity; change in judges lessen disparity offsetting trends (B): change in decisions lessen disparity; change in judges increase disparity |