Detainees Leaving ICE Detention from the
Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Detainees Deported or Released Number last 12 months 78 Out of total detained 651 Facility ranking on detainees top 59 %
Table 1: Number leaving ICE detention
from this facilityDuring the most recent 12 month period for which data are available, a total of 78 detainees housed at the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility left that facility because they were deported, were released under supervision while their cases were being decided, or left ICE detention for one of a variety of other reasons. This is a special ICE holding area or staging location that under current ICE detention standards is allowed to temporarily house aliens for up to 12 or 16 hours. These types of units generally have no sleeping quarters or shower facilities.
Those individuals who departed from this facility because they were leaving ICE detention made up 12 percent of the 651 detainees housed at this facility during the last 12 months. This report focuses on the reasons these individuals left ICE detention. Sometimes this report speaks of these individuals as those "exiting" ICE detention, or simply as "exits." The others remained in ICE detention but were transferred from the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility to other facilities.
This report covers those who left ICE custody. It excludes individuals transferred to other ICE facilities. For more information on this facility, including individuals that were transferred, see additional TRAC reports in this series.
This report series is based upon analyses conducted by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University of 1.7 million government records tracking each individual who passed through an ICE detention facility during fiscal year 2015. This most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available covers October 2014 through September 2015. See About the Data.
How This Facility Ranks Nationally
Rankings on the number leaving ICE detention. The Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility was one of 637 facilities nationwide that housed ICE detainees during the most recent 12 month period. Of these 637, there were 358 that had at least 10 individuals who were deported or released. Excluding those facilities with fewer than 10 exits, the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility last year ranked in the top 59 percent nationwide in the number of individuals leaving ICE detention. This means that 59 percent of the locations contributed the same or a larger numbers of exits, while 41 percent had a smaller number. See Table 1.
Deportations. Nationally, the most common reason that a detainee left ICE detention was that they were deported from the United States. During the most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available, nationwide 56.3 percent of those leaving ICE detention were deported or "voluntarily" departed. By way of comparison, a lower percentage of detainees (5 percent) left the country from the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility because they were formally deported, or left under the so-called "voluntary departure" procedure.
Were Detained Individuals from the Local Area?
Information on the place of arrest was not included in the available data ICE released. However, we can examine whether the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility was the first ICE facility in which these detainees were held. According to ICE records, for a substantial proportion (28 percent) of these detainees, the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility was the first place they were sent when they were detained by ICE. The remaining 72 percent had been transferred in from another ICE detention facility.
We can also look at how quickly they arrived at this facility after they were first detained. Again, a total of 28 percent arrived at the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility at some point during the very first day they were detained by ICE. There was considerable variability among detainees in the number of detention facilities they had been held in before they were finally deported or released from this facility. The number of facilities ranged as high as 4 separate locations for some detainees. These figures again are based on an analysis of the most recent 12 months for which data are available.
For the United States as a whole, last year the average number of ICE facilities detainees moved through was 1.8. Detainees at the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility on average had stayed at somewhat more (2.2) ICE facilities.
Reason Left ICE Facility Profile U.S Profile Number Percent Percent U.S. Marshal or Other Agency 37 47.4 % 4.5 % Orders of Recognizance or Supervision 14 17.9 % 19.8 % Alternative ATD custody 13 16.6 % 0.1 % Bonded out 7 8.9 % 11.0 % Deported/Removed 4 5.1 % 55.3 % Prosecutorial Discretion 3 3.8 % 1.0 % Died 0 . 0.0 % Escaped 0 . 0.0 % Release to ORR 0 . 0.1 % Paroled 0 . 5.2 % Proceedings Terminated 0 . 1.3 % Voluntary departure 0 . 0.9 % Withdrawal 0 . 0.2 % Total 78 100.0 % 100.0 %
Table 3: Reasons individuals left ICE detention during the last 12 months
Why Did Detainees Leave ICE Detention?
ICE records one of 29 reasons a detainee left ICE detention. As shown in Table 3, these reasons fall into 13 general categories -- from leaving because one is deported or removed, to leaving because one escaped or the individual died while in custody.
Deportation. As mentioned earlier, while nationally the most common reason that a detainee left ICE detention was that they were deported from this country, this was not the top reason at this facility. At the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility only 4 individuals (5 percent) were deported or removed during the most recent 12 month period for which data are available. (ICE data did not distinguish between deportations and removals, and the terms are used interchangeably in this report.)
Transferred to criminal custody. The most common reason a person left ICE detention from this facility was that they were transferred to criminal custody. A total of 37 individuals (47 percent) left this facility last year because they were turned over to U.S. Marshals or to some other government agency. This typically occurs because there is an outstanding criminal case against the individual, or the individual is needed as a material witness in a criminal case.
Orders. Orders are additional mechanisms that are sometimes used to release a person while their case is pending, or awaiting removal. Under an "order of recognizance" an individual is released with reporting conditions while in deportation proceedings and awaiting a final decision. A second type of order ("order of supervision") releases an individual after a final order of removal. Here an individual is released because ICE has not met the time limits the law imposes for deporting the individual. There were 14 (18 percent) who left the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility detention for these reasons: 6 with orders of recognizance, and 8 with orders of supervision.
Alternative ATD custody. A total of 13 individuals (17 percent) were released from detention under an "ATD" monitoring arrangement. Under ICE's "alternatives to detention" or ATD program, the individual while not detained typically has to wear an electronic ankle monitor and report regularly under a closely supervised release arrangement.
Bonded out. A group of individuals (7 or 9 percent) were also "bonded out." This generally covers situations where the individual posts a bond and is released while awaiting a decision on their deportation (removal) case. The amount of the bond is set by ICE, or by an Immigration Judge. Many individuals are not eligible to be released because their continued detention is considered mandatory under provisions in the immigration laws.
Prosecutorial discretion. The Department of Homeland Security sets immigration enforcement priorities and guidance on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion (PD), including special programs on deferred action for childhood arrivals. To focus its limited resources on higher priority targets, individuals that don't fall into these high priority categories may -- through the exercise of prosecutorial discretion -- be released from custody and any proposed deportation actions deferred. A total of 3 individuals (4 percent) were released under these PD programs.
Escape and death. Nationally, there were 65 individuals who escaped ICE detention during the latest 12 month period for which data are available, and 6 individuals were recorded as having died in detention. No one was recorded by the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility as either escaping or dying last year.
As shown in Table 3, no one was recorded as leaving the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility during the past 12 months for the following reasons: Release to ORR, Paroled, Proceedings Terminated, Voluntary Return and Withdrawal. See "Reasons for Leaving ICE Detention" for a description of these categories.
Comparing Release Reasons Against The National Picture
In many respects release reasons for the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility departed from the national picture. It was the case that a lower proportion left because they were deported from this facility (5 percent) than was true for the U.S. as a whole (55 percent). No one left as a voluntary departure from this facility, while this was true for 1 percent of all individuals nationally.
In addition, differences were seen for those released to the U.S. Marshal or other agency (47 versus 5 percent), ATD (17 versus 0 percent), and for those paroled (none versus 5 percent).
The facility's percentages fell within 3 percentage points of the national figures for all other categories.
Nationalities
Which nationalities predominate? Last year in the United States, individuals from Mexico comprised the largest number of those leaving ICE detention. Some 43.4 percent of all detainees recorded Mexico as their country of origin. The Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility had a much smaller proportion of detainees from Mexico - 29 percent among their exits. Detainees from Mexico were also the largest single nationality group among those leaving detention from the facility.
In descending order, the other top nationalities after Mexico that made up those leaving ICE detention from the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility last year were: Dominican Republic (14%), Guatemala (10%), Honduras (5%) and Jamaica (4%).
This compared to the United States as a whole where the other top five nationalities after Mexico were Guatemala (19%), El Salvador (15%), Honduras (12%) and Ecuador (1%).
For the frequency for each of the other nationalities among those leaving ICE detention from the Philadelphia District Office Holding Facility last year see Table 4.
Nationalities Ranked in Top 10 Left ICE Detention Total Deported/
Voluntary
DeparturePercent - ALL 78 4 5.1 % 1 Mexico 23 0 0.0 % 2 Dominican Republic 11 0 0.0 % 3 Guatemala 8 0 0.0 % 4 Honduras 4 0 0.0 % 5 Jamaica 3 0 0.0 % 6 Ecuador 2 0 0.0 % Egypt 2 0 0.0 % Moldova 2 0 0.0 % 9 Argentina 1 1 100.0 % Bangladesh 1 0 0.0 % Belarus 1 0 0.0 % Colombia 1 0 0.0 % Costa Rica 1 0 0.0 % Cuba 1 0 0.0 % El Salvador 1 0 0.0 % Georgia 1 1 100.0 % India 1 1 100.0 % Ireland 1 0 0.0 % Jordan 1 0 0.0 % Liberia 1 0 0.0 % Mali 1 0 0.0 % Nicaragua 1 0 0.0 % Peru 1 0 0.0 % Poland 1 1 100.0 % St. Kitts-Nevis 1 0 0.0 % Trinidad And Tobago 1 0 0.0 % Turkey 1 0 0.0 % Unknown 1 0 0.0 % Ussr 1 0 0.0 % Uzbekistan 1 0 0.0 % Vietnam 1 0 0.0 %
Table 4: Numbers leaving ICE detention by nationality
during the last 12 months
