Detainees Leaving ICE Detention from the
Florence Service Processing Center
Florence, Arizona

Detainees Deported or Released
Number last 12 months 8,148
Out of total detained 9,355
Facility ranking on detainees top 4 %

Table 1: Number leaving ICE detention
from this facility

During the most recent 12 month period for which data are available, a total of 8,148 detainees housed at the Florence Service Processing Center left that facility because they were deported, were released under supervision while their cases were being decided, or left ICE detention for one of a variety of other reasons. This facility is an ICE Service Processing Center (SPC). While the facility is government owned, it is operated by the Asset Protection and Security Services that was in the business of providing detention services for housing federal detainees.

Those individuals who departed from this facility because they were leaving ICE detention made up 87 percent of the 9,355 detainees housed at this facility during the last 12 months. This report focuses on the reasons these individuals left ICE detention. Sometimes this report speaks of these individuals as those "exiting" ICE detention, or simply as "exits." The others remained in ICE detention but were transferred from the Florence Service Processing Center to other facilities.

This report covers those who left ICE custody. It excludes individuals transferred to other ICE facilities. For more information on this facility, including individuals that were transferred, see additional TRAC reports in this series.

This report series is based upon analyses conducted by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University of 1.7 million government records tracking each individual who passed through an ICE detention facility during fiscal year 2015. This most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available covers October 2014 through September 2015. See About the Data.

How This Facility Ranks Nationally

Rankings on the number leaving ICE detention. The Florence Service Processing Center was one of 637 facilities nationwide that housed ICE detainees during the most recent 12 month period. Of these 637, there were 358 that had at least 10 individuals who were deported or released. Excluding those facilities with fewer than 10 exits, the Florence Service Processing Center last year ranked in the top 4 percent nationwide in the number of individuals leaving ICE detention. This means that 4 percent of the locations contributed the same or a larger numbers of exits, while 96 percent had a smaller number. See Table 1.

Deportations. Nationally, the most common reason that a detainee left ICE detention was that they were deported from the United States. During the most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available, nationwide 56.3 percent of those leaving ICE detention were deported or "voluntarily" departed. By way of comparison, a higher percentage of detainees (79 percent) left the country from the Florence Service Processing Center because they were formally deported, or left under the so-called "voluntary departure" procedure.

Were Detained Individuals from the Local Area?

Information on the place of arrest was not included in the available data ICE released. However, we can examine whether the Florence Service Processing Center was the first ICE facility in which these detainees were held. According to ICE records, for a few (3) of these detainees, the Florence Service Processing Center was the first place they were sent when they were detained by ICE. Virtually all had been transferred in from another ICE detention facility.

We can also look at how quickly they arrived at this facility after they were first detained. A total of 1 percent arrived at the Florence Service Processing Center at some point during the very first day they were detained by ICE. There was considerable variability among detainees in the number of detention facilities they had been held in before they were finally deported or released from this facility. The number of facilities ranged as high as 9 separate locations for some detainees. These figures again are based on an analysis of the most recent 12 months for which data are available.

For the United States as a whole, last year the average number of ICE facilities detainees moved through was 1.8. Detainees at the Florence Service Processing Center on average had stayed at somewhat more (2.9) ICE facilities.

Reason Left ICE Facility Profile U.S Profile
Number Percent Percent
Deported/Removed 6,417 78.7 % 55.3 %
Bonded out 1,590 19.5 % 11.0 %
Proceedings Terminated 54 0.6 % 1.3 %
Orders of Recognizance or Supervision 34 0.4 % 19.8 %
Paroled 21 0.2 % 5.2 %
U.S. Marshal or Other Agency 18 0.2 % 4.5 %
Voluntary departure 10 0.1 % 0.9 %
Prosecutorial Discretion 2 0.0 % 1.0 %
Died 1 0.0 % 0.0 %
Release to ORR 1 0.0 % 0.1 %
Alternative ATD custody 0 . 0.1 %
Escaped 0 . 0.0 %
Withdrawal 0 . 0.2 %
Total 8,148 100.0 % 100.0 %

Table 3: Reasons individuals left ICE detention during the last 12 months

Why Did Detainees Leave ICE Detention?

ICE records one of 29 reasons a detainee left ICE detention. As shown in Table 3, these reasons fall into 13 general categories -- from leaving because one is deported or removed, to leaving because one escaped or the individual died while in custody.

Deportation. As mentioned earlier, the most common reason detainees left the Florence Service Processing Center was that they were deported. A total of 6,417 individuals (79 percent) were deported or removed from the Florence Service Processing Center during the most recent 12 month period for which data are available. (ICE data did not distinguish between deportations and removals, and the terms are used interchangeably in this report.)

Bonded out. A group of individuals (1,590 or 20 percent) were also "bonded out." This generally covers situations where the individual posts a bond and is released while awaiting a decision on their deportation (removal) case. The amount of the bond is set by ICE, or by an Immigration Judge. Many individuals are not eligible to be released because their continued detention is considered mandatory under provisions in the immigration laws.

No legitimate grounds to deport. Sometimes individuals left ICE detention because they "won" their case. Typically this occurs when an Immigration Judge orders the deportation proceedings ICE has filed against them "terminated" (dismissed) and the judge's order after any appeals becomes final. Analysis of the latest 12 months of data show that a total of 54 individuals, or 1 percent were released from detention by the Florence Service Processing Center because a determination was made that there were no grounds to deport the individuals and thus ICE had to release them from custody.

Escape and death. Nationally, there were 65 individuals who escaped ICE detention during the latest 12 month period for which data are available, and 6 individuals were recorded as having died in detention. No one was recorded as escaping last year from the Florence Service Processing Center, but there was one death.

As shown in Table 3, no one was recorded as leaving the Florence Service Processing Center during the past 12 months for the following reasons: Alternative ATD custody and Withdrawal. See "Reasons for Leaving ICE Detention" for a description of these categories.

Pie chart of release_grp

Figure 2: Reasons individuals left ICE detention

Comparing Release Reasons Against The National Picture

In many respects release reasons for the Florence Service Processing Center departed from the national picture. It was the case that a higher proportion left because they were deported from this facility (79 percent) than was true for the U.S. as a whole (55 percent).

In addition, differences were seen for individuals released on bond (20 versus 11 percent), detainees released on orders of recognizance or supervision (0 versus 20 percent), for those paroled (0 versus 5 percent), and those released to the U.S. Marshal or other agency (0 versus 5 percent).

The facility's percentages fell within 3 percentage points of the national figures for all other categories.

Pie chart of nat

Figure 3: Nationality of those
leaving ICE detention

Nationalities

Which nationalities predominate? Last year in the United States, individuals from Mexico comprised the largest number of those leaving ICE detention. Some 43.4 percent of all detainees recorded Mexico as their country of origin. The Florence Service Processing Center had a much smaller proportion of detainees from Mexico - 6 percent among their exits. Detainees from Mexico were not the largest single nationality group among those leaving detention from the facility.

In descending order, the top nationalities that made up those leaving ICE detention from the Florence Service Processing Center last year were: Guatemala (56%) , Honduras (15%), El Salvador (12%), India (6%) and Mexico (6%).

This compared to the United States as a whole where the other top five nationalities after Mexico were Guatemala (19%), El Salvador (15%), Honduras (12%) and Ecuador (1%).

For the frequency for each of the other nationalities within the top 10 among those leaving ICE detention from the Florence Service Processing Center last year see Table 4.

Deportations and voluntary departures by nationality. Within the nationalities that made up those listed in Table 4 with more than one individual, the proportion deported or voluntarily departing varied from 0 percent to 96 percent. As mentioned above, this compares with 79 percent for all detainees.

Nationalities Ranked in Top 10 Left ICE Detention
Total Deported/
Voluntary
Departure
Percent
- ALL 8,148 6,427 78.8 %
1 Guatemala 4,543 4,172 91.8 %
2 Honduras 1,248 1,200 96.1 %
3 El Salvador 981 844 86.0 %
4 India 527 3 0.5 %
5 Mexico 505 145 28.7 %
6 Ecuador 104 0 0.0 %
7 China, Peoples Republic Of 60 2 3.3 %
8 Peru 27 16 59.2 %
9 Romania 20 2 10.0 %
10 Brazil 18 13 72.2 %

Table 4: Numbers leaving ICE detention by nationality
during the last 12 months

With the highest rate of 96 percent were detainees from Honduras where 1,248 individuals were deported or took voluntary departure. At the other end of the range were detainees from Ecuador, where none ended up deported or were allowed voluntary departure.

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2016, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC Immigration Web Site