Detainees Leaving ICE Detention from the
Crittenton Foster Care
Fullerton, California
Detainees Deported or Released Number last 12 months 40 Out of total detained 53 Facility ranking on detainees top 73 %
Table 1: Number leaving ICE detention
from this facilityDuring the most recent 12 month period for which data are available, a total of 40 detainees housed at the Crittenton Foster Care left that facility because they were deported, were released under supervision while their cases were being decided, or left ICE detention for one of a variety of other reasons. This is a special facility for housing juveniles.
Those individuals who departed from this facility because they were leaving ICE detention made up 75 percent of the 53 detainees housed at this facility during the last 12 months. This report focuses on the reasons these individuals left ICE detention. Sometimes this report speaks of these individuals as those "exiting" ICE detention, or simply as "exits." The others remained in ICE detention but were transferred from the Crittenton Foster Care to other facilities.
This report covers those who left ICE custody. It excludes individuals transferred to other ICE facilities. For more information on this facility, including individuals that were transferred, see additional TRAC reports in this series.
This report series is based upon analyses conducted by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University of 1.7 million government records tracking each individual who passed through an ICE detention facility during fiscal year 2015. This most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available covers October 2014 through September 2015. See About the Data.
How This Facility Ranks Nationally
Rankings on the number leaving ICE detention. The Crittenton Foster Care was one of 637 facilities nationwide that housed ICE detainees during the most recent 12 month period. Of these 637, there were 358 that had at least 10 individuals who were deported or released. Excluding those facilities with fewer than 10 exits, the Crittenton Foster Care last year ranked in the top 73 percent nationwide in the number of individuals leaving ICE detention. This means that 73 percent of the locations contributed the same or a larger numbers of exits, while 27 percent had a smaller number. See Table 1.
Deportations. Nationally, the most common reason that a detainee left ICE detention was that they were deported from the United States. During the most recent 12 month period for which comprehensive data are available, nationwide 56.3 percent of those leaving ICE detention were deported or "voluntarily" departed. By way of comparison, a lower percentage of detainees (0 percent) left the country from the Crittenton Foster Care because they were formally deported, or left under the so-called "voluntary departure" procedure.
Were Detained Individuals from the Local Area?
Information on the place of arrest was not included in the available data ICE released. However, we can examine whether the Crittenton Foster Care was the first ICE facility in which these detainees were held. According to ICE records, for a few (3 percent) of these detainees, the Crittenton Foster Care was the first place they were sent when they were detained by ICE. The remaining 98 percent had been transferred in from another ICE detention facility.
We can also look at how quickly they arrived at this facility after they were first detained. Again, a total of 3 percent arrived at the Crittenton Foster Care at some point during the very first day they were detained by ICE. There was considerable variability among detainees in the number of detention facilities they had been held in before they were finally deported or released from this facility. The number of facilities ranged as high as 7 separate locations for some detainees. These figures again are based on an analysis of the most recent 12 months for which data are available.
For the United States as a whole, last year the average number of ICE facilities detainees moved through was 1.8. Detainees at the Crittenton Foster Care on average had stayed at somewhat more (3.0) ICE facilities.
Reason Left ICE Facility Profile U.S Profile Number Percent Percent Proceedings Terminated 28 70.0 % 1.3 % Escaped 10 25.0 % 0.0 % Orders of Recognizance or Supervision 2 5.0 % 19.8 % Alternative ATD custody 0 . 0.1 % Bonded out 0 . 11.0 % Deported/Removed 0 . 55.3 % Died 0 . 0.0 % Release to ORR 0 . 0.1 % Paroled 0 . 5.2 % Prosecutorial Discretion 0 . 1.0 % U.S. Marshal or Other Agency 0 . 4.5 % Voluntary departure 0 . 0.9 % Withdrawal 0 . 0.2 % Total 40 100.0 % 100.0 %
Table 3: Reasons individuals left ICE detention during the last 12 months
No legitimate grounds to deport. The most common reason a person left ICE detention from this facility was that they "won" their case. Typically this occurs when an Immigration Judge orders the deportation proceedings ICE has filed against them "terminated" (dismissed) and the judge's order after any appeals becomes final. Analysis of the latest 12 months of data show that a total of 28 individuals, or 70 percent were released from detention by the Crittenton Foster Care because a determination was made that there were no grounds to deport the individuals and thus ICE had to release them from custody.
Orders. Orders are additional mechanisms that are sometimes used to release a person while their case is pending, or awaiting removal. Under an "order of recognizance" an individual is released with reporting conditions while in deportation proceedings and awaiting a final decision. A second type of order ("order of supervision") releases an individual after a final order of removal. Here an individual is released because ICE has not met the time limits the law imposes for deporting the individual. There were 2 (5 percent) who left the Crittenton Foster Care detention for these reasons: 2 with orders of recognizance, and none with an order of supervision.
Escape and death. Nationally, there were 65 individuals who escaped ICE detention during the latest 12 month period for which data are available, and 6 individuals were recorded as having died in detention. No one was recorded as dying last year at the Crittenton Foster Care, but there were 10 escapes.
As shown in Table 3, no one was recorded as leaving the Crittenton Foster Care during the past 12 months for the following reasons: Alternative ATD custody, Bonded Out, Removed, Release to ORR, Paroled, Prosecutorial Discretion, U.S. Marshals or other agency, Voluntary Return and Withdrawal. See "Reasons for Leaving ICE Detention" for a description of these categories.
Comparing Release Reasons Against The National Picture
In many respects release reasons for the Crittenton Foster Care departed from the national picture. No one left because they were deported from this facility, while for the U.S. as a whole 55 percent left for this reason. No one left as a voluntary departure from this facility, while this was true for 1 percent of all individuals nationally.
In addition, differences were seen for persons whose proceedings were terminated (70 versus 1 percent), those who escaped (25 versus 0 percent), detainees released on orders of recognizance or supervision (5 versus 20 percent), individuals released on bond (none versus 11 percent), for those paroled (none versus 5 percent), and those released to the U.S. Marshal or other agency (none versus 5 percent).
The facility's percentages fell within 3 percentage points of the national figures for all other categories.
Nationalities
Which nationalities predominate? Last year in the United States, individuals from Mexico comprised the largest number of those leaving ICE detention. Some 43.4 percent of all detainees recorded Mexico as their country of origin. The Crittenton Foster Care had a much smaller proportion of detainees from Mexico - 10 percent among their exits. Detainees from Mexico were not the largest single nationality group among those leaving detention from the facility.
In descending order, the top nationalities that made up those leaving ICE detention from the Crittenton Foster Care last year were: Honduras (48%) , Guatemala (35%), Mexico (10%) and El Salvador (8%).
This compared to the United States as a whole where the other top five nationalities after Mexico were Guatemala (19%), El Salvador (15%), Honduras (12%) and Ecuador (1%).
