Prosecutions for February 2012

Referring Agency: Internal Revenue Service

Number Latest Month 111
Percent Change from previous month -16.5
Percent Change from 1 year ago 2.1
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 39.7
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 40.3
Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during February 2012 the government reported 111 new prosecutions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Internal Revenue Service. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 16.5% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2012 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was up (2.1 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 39.7 percent from levels reported in 2007.

Plot of _FREQ_ by FYMONDT

Figure 1: Monthly trends in prosecutions

The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in February 2012 was for "Fraud-Tax", accounting for 45 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (32.4%), " Fraud-Financial Institution" (4.5%), "Fraud-Other" (3.6%), "Government Property-Crimes Against" (3.6%), "Fraud-Identity Theft-Aggravated" (2.7%). See Figure 2.

Pie chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In February 2012, 3 defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in February the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326 involving the "Reentry of deported alien". This was the lead charge for 33.3 percent of all magistrate filings in February.

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

In February 2012, 108 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during February there were an additional 1 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during February.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during February 2012referred by the Internal Revenue Service.

Lead Charge Count Rank  
26 USC 7201 - Attempt to evade or defeat tax 15 1 More
26 USC 7206 - Fraud and False statements 12 2 More
18 USC 287 - False, fictitious or fraudulent claims 10 3 More
18 USC 286 - Conspiracy to defraud the Government claims 6 4 More
18 USC 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television 5 5 More
18 USC 641 - Public money, property or records 4 6 More
18 USC 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments 3 7 More
26 USC 7212 - Attempts to interfere with admin of tax laws 3 7 More
18 USC 1029 - Fraud and related activity - access devices 2 9 More
18 USC 1344 - Bank Fraud 2 9 More
18 USC 1957 - Monetary transactions w/property from unlawful act 2 9 More
26 USC 7203 - Willful failure to file return, supply information 2 9 More
Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Attempt to evade or defeat tax" (Title 26 U.S.C Section 7201) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Fraud and False statements" under Title 26 U.S.C Section 7206.

  • Ranked 3rd was "False, fictitious or fraudulent claims" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 287.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In February 2012 the Justice Department said the government brought 42.6 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.


Judicial District Count Rank  
Mo, W 10 1 More
Maryland 8 2 More
Fla, S 6 3 More
Ohio, S 6 3 More
Ill, N 5 5 More
Texas, W 5 5 More
Cal, E 4 7 More
Cal, N 4 7 More
N. Y., S 4 7 More
Texas, N 4 7 More
Table 3: Top 10 districts

  • The Western District of Missouri (Kansas City)—with 10 prosecutions—was the most active during February 2012.

  • The District of Maryland ranked 2nd.

  • Southern District of Florida (Miami) and Southern District of Ohio (Cincinnati) are now ranking 3rd.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during February 2012 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank  
Laughrey, Nanette Kay Mo, W 9 1 More
Blake, Catherine C. Maryland 5 2 More
Smith, Walter Scott, Jr. Texas, W 5 2 More
Mueller, Kimberly Jo Cal, E 3 4 More
King, James Lawrence Fla, S 3 4 More
Black, Bruce D. N Mexico 3 4 More
Scriven, Mary Stenson Fla, M 2 7 More
Hinkle, Robert Lewis Fla, N 2 7 More
Tydingco-Gatewood, Frances M. Guam 2 7 More
Der-Yeghiayan, Samuel Ill, N 2 7 More
Reagan, Michael Joseph Ill, S 2 7 More
Gossett, F.A. Nebraska 2 7 More
Adams, John R. Ohio, N 2 7 More
Black, Timothy Seymour Ohio, S 2 7 More
Kane, Yvette Penn, M 2 7 More
Cummings, Samuel Ray Texas, N 2 7 More
Benson, Dee Vance Utah 2 7 More
Jones, James Parker Virg, W 2 7 More
Settle, Benjamin Hale Wash, W 2 7 More
Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 8 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings , while the remaining 11 judges were from other districts. (Because of ties, there were a total of 19 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)

  • Judge Nanette Kay Laughrey in the Western District of Missouri (Kansas City) ranked 1st with 9 defendants in cases.

  • Judges Catherine C. Blake in the District of Maryland and Walter Scott Smith, Jr. in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd with 5 defendants in cases.

Report Generated: May 8, 2012
TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2012, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page