Prosecutions for June 2010

Number Latest Month 15,857
Percent Change from previous month 9.1
Percent Change from 1 year ago 1.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 43.8
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 0.9

Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during June 2010 the government reported 15857 new prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 9.1% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2010 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was only slightlyup (1.6 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 43.8 percent from levels reported in 2005.

The growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in prosecutions is 0.9 percent instead of 43.8 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 6,855 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 7,442 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 9,285 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 7,994 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 8,511 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 7,794 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 7,771 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 8,292 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 7,637 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 7,536 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 6,871 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 6,756 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 7,248 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 7,132 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 8,334 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 9,026 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 8,639 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 7,791 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 8,374 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 7,825 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 8,305 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 8,276 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 7,472 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 7,365 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 7,892 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 8,512 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 9,089 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 8,740 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 8,855 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 8,112 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 8,761 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 8,329 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 9,755 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 8,654 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 7,280 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 9,160 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 9,041 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 8,867 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 11,826 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 11,324 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 10,359 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 10,066 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 9,231 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 10,676 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 9,340 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 8,672 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 8,037 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 8,086 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 8,581 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 8,446 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 10,998 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 9,867 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 10,412 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 10,489 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 9,710 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 10,998 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 10,501 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 9,039 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 9,082 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 8,564 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 9,209 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 8,701 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 11,001 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 8,974 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 9,710 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 10,341 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 9,019 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 9,616 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 9,612 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 9,292 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 8,397 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 8,128 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 8,733 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 8,896 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 10,899 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 10,026 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 10,675 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 9,613 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 8,756 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 10,591 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 10,478 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 9,720 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 8,904 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 8,885 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 9,820 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 12,436 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 14,638 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 14,626 FYMONDT: May2008
_FREQ_: 14,456 FYMONDT: Jun2008
_FREQ_: 14,948 FYMONDT: Jul2008
_FREQ_: 14,745 FYMONDT: Aug2008
_FREQ_: 12,289 FYMONDT: Sep2008
_FREQ_: 16,750 FYMONDT: Oct2008
_FREQ_: 14,808 FYMONDT: Nov2008
_FREQ_: 12,149 FYMONDT: Dec2008
_FREQ_: 11,841 FYMONDT: Jan2009
_FREQ_: 12,114 FYMONDT: Feb2009
_FREQ_: 13,088 FYMONDT: Mar2009
_FREQ_: 15,023 FYMONDT: Apr2009
_FREQ_: 14,448 FYMONDT: May2009
_FREQ_: 12,859 FYMONDT: Jun2009
_FREQ_: 15,645 FYMONDT: Jul2009
_FREQ_: 14,634 FYMONDT: Aug2009
_FREQ_: 14,286 FYMONDT: Sep2009
_FREQ_: 14,992 FYMONDT: Oct2009
_FREQ_: 13,381 FYMONDT: Nov2009
_FREQ_: 11,748 FYMONDT: Dec2009
_FREQ_: 12,327 FYMONDT: Jan2010
_FREQ_: 10,891 FYMONDT: Feb2010
_FREQ_: 11,554 FYMONDT: Mar2010
_FREQ_: 15,766 FYMONDT: Apr2010
_FREQ_: 15,934 FYMONDT: May2010
_FREQ_: 14,536 FYMONDT: Jun2010
_FREQ_: 15,857 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 7980.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 8132.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 8274.5 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 7999.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 7923.5 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 7650.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 7477.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 7390 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 7196.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 7312.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 7561.1666667 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 7855.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 8028.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 8216 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 8331.5 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 8326.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 8201.6666667 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 8007.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 7936.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 7855.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 7970.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 8101 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 8178.3333333 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 8408.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 8533.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 8678.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 8647.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 8758.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 8744.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 8481.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 8656.5 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 8703.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 8792.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 9138 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 9583 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 10096.166667 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 10247.166667 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 10278.833333 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 10580.333333 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 10166 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 9724 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 9337 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 9007 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 8898.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 8527 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 8803.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 9002.5 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 9398.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 9798.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 9987 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 10412.333333 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 10329.5 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 10191.5 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 9969.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 9649 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 9565.5 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 9182.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 9266 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 9255.1666667 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 9359.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 9656 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 9624.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 9776.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 9545.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 9598.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 9379.5 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 9010.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 8963 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 8843 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 9057.5 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 9179.8333333 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 9559.5 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 9807 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 9810.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 10093.333333 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 10023.166667 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 9972.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 9677 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 9555.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 9733 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 10040.5 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 10733.833333 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 11551.5 FYMONDT: May2008
moveave: 12476.833333 FYMONDT: Jun2008
moveave: 13487.333333 FYMONDT: Jul2008
moveave: 14308.166667 FYMONDT: Aug2008
moveave: 14283.666667 FYMONDT: Sep2008
moveave: 14635.666667 FYMONDT: Oct2008
moveave: 14666 FYMONDT: Nov2008
moveave: 14281.5 FYMONDT: Dec2008
moveave: 13763.666667 FYMONDT: Jan2009
moveave: 13325.166667 FYMONDT: Feb2009
moveave: 13458.333333 FYMONDT: Mar2009
moveave: 13170.5 FYMONDT: Apr2009
moveave: 13110.5 FYMONDT: May2009
moveave: 13228.833333 FYMONDT: Jun2009
moveave: 13862.833333 FYMONDT: Jul2009
moveave: 14282.833333 FYMONDT: Aug2009
moveave: 14482.5 FYMONDT: Sep2009
moveave: 14477.333333 FYMONDT: Oct2009
moveave: 14299.5 FYMONDT: Nov2009
moveave: 14114.333333 FYMONDT: Dec2009
moveave: 13561.333333 FYMONDT: Jan2010
moveave: 12937.5 FYMONDT: Feb2010
moveave: 12482.166667 FYMONDT: Mar2010
moveave: 12611.166667 FYMONDT: Apr2010
moveave: 13036.666667 FYMONDT: May2010
moveave: 13501.333333 FYMONDT: Jun2010
moveave: 14089.666667
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Monthly trends in prosecutions

The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in June 2010 was for "Immigration", accounting for 50.4 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (12.2%), " Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (8.5%), "Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (4.6%), "Assimilated Crimes" (3.7%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (3.6%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (3.2%). See Figure 2.

The lead investigative agency for prosecutions in June 2010 was DHS accounting for 56 percent of prosecutions referred. Other agencies with substantial numbers of referrals were: DEA (11% ), FBI (10%), ATF (6%), Defense (3%). See Figure 3.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 37%  (37.37%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 50%  (50.43%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 12%  (12.2%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 12%  (12.2%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 12%  (12.2%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions
agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.82%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 10%  (10.1%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (3.44%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (3.44%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (3.44%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (3.44%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (3.44%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (3.44%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 56%  (56.22%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 11%  (11.23%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 11%  (11.23%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 11%  (11.23%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.19%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.19%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.19%)
PIE3D chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 3: Prosecutions by investigative agency

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In June 2010, 9204 defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in June the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 43.7 percent of all magistrate filings in June.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (24.7%), "18 USC 13 - Laws of States Adopted in Federal jurisdiction" (5.5%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

In June 2010, 6653 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during June there were an additional 2590 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during June.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during June 2010.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 2,193 1 1 2 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 1,393 2 2 1 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 851 3 3 3 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 558 4 4 4 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 313 5 5 5 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 161 6 7 14 More
18 USC 1344 - Bank fraud 134 7 12 10 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 129 8 6 7 More
18 USC 1341 - Mail Fraud - Frauds and swindles 126 9 14 13 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 120 10 9 12 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846. "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 47.4 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1341 that involves " Mail Fraud - Frauds and swindles ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—108.5 percent—was registered for prosecutions under " Reentry of deported alien " (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 33.2 percent—was Importation of controlled substances (Title 21 U.S.C Section 952 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 24.5 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In June 2010 the Justice Department said the government brought 15498 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
N Mexico 28,661 480 1 5 4 More
Wyoming 21,607 98 2 53 71 More
Cal, S 20,940 562 3 3 5 More
Texas, W 19,748 1,009 4 1 2 More
Arizona 11,917 655 5 4 3 More
Ala, S 10,905 75 6 62 39 More
Texas, S 10,487 735 7 2 1 More
D. C. 9,605 48 8 70 47 More
N Dakota 7,792 42 9 77 68 More
Nevada 6,402 141 10 43 26 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of New Mexico—with 28661 prosecutions as compared with 15498 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during June 2010. The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.

  • The District of Wyoming ranked 2nd.

  • Southern District of California (San Diego) is now ranking 3rd. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Nevada , now ranked 10th , and Wyoming at 2nd In the same order, these districts ranked 43rd and 53rd one year ago and 26th and 71st five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 43.1 percent—was North Dakota . Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 125.7 percent—was Southern District of California (San Diego).

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 3.9 percent—was Wyoming .  But over the past five years, Southern District of Alabama (Mobile) showed the largest drop— 33.2 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during June 2010 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 179 1 1 3 More
Junell, Robert A. Texas, W 150 2 9 8 More
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 124 3 2 1 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 121 4 3 2 More
Briones, David Texas, W 119 5 7 5 More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 116 6 8 13 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 105 7 6 6 More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 105 7 4 4 More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 92 9 10 11 More
Garcia-Gregory, Jay A. Puer Rico 89 10 106 98 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 9 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita, while the remaining 1 judges were from other districts.

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 1st with 179 defendants in cases. Judge Brack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 3).

  • Judge Robert A. Junell in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd with 150 defendants in cases. Judge Junell appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 9) and five years ago (rank 8).

  • Judge George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 124 defendants in cases. Judge Kazen appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 2) and five years ago (rank 1).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2010, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page