Prosecutions for June 2009
Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during June 2009 the government reported 18155 new prosecutions.
According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 36.7% over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)
When monthly 2009 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in
the previous year, the number of filings was up (6.9 percent).
Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago.
Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 39.7 percent from levels reported in 2004.
The growth in
these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases
are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in
prosecutions is 5.2 percent instead of 39.7 percent.
The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases
by the Justice Department.
Figure 1: Criminal Prosecutions over the last five years
The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1
represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month
basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so
that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.
The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in June 2009 was for "Immigration", accounting for 54.6 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (13.6%), "
Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (5.9%), "Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (3.9%), "Assimilated Crimes" (3.5%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (3.5%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (2.9%).
See Figure 2.
The lead investigative agency for prosecutions in June 2009
was DHS accounting for 61 percent of prosecutions referred.
Other agencies with substantial numbers of referrals were:
DEA (10% ), FBI (8%), ATF (5%), Defense (4%).
See Figure 3.
Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions
Figure 3: Prosecutions by Investigative Agency
Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In June 2009, 54 percent of cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious
misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses."
In the magistrate courts in June the most frequently cited lead charge was
Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge
for 52.5 percent of all magistrate filings in June.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (19.8%).
Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters
filed in U.S. District Court during June 2009.
Table 2: Top charges filed
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841.
"Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..
Ranked 3rd was "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846.
"Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest
increase in prosecutions—up 50.1 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 952
that involves " Importation of controlled substances
".
Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—147.4 percent—was registered for
prosecutions under " Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents
" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 ).
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest
decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 19.1 percent—was
Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
(Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 ).
Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions— 39.3 percent—was
for filings where the lead charge was " Bank fraud
" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1344
).
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
In June 2009 the Justice Department said the government brought 3347.5 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.
Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the
largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3.
Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.
| 19,626 |
508 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
More |
| 18,658 |
302 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
More |
| 18,464 |
883 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
More |
| 12,288 |
814 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
More |
| 10,121 |
520 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
More |
| 7,569 |
51 |
6 |
45 |
71 |
More |
| 7,067 |
83 |
7 |
56 |
62 |
More |
| 6,849 |
45 |
8 |
53 |
46 |
More |
| 6,373 |
137 |
9 |
23 |
19 |
More |
| 6,131 |
65 |
10 |
69 |
76 |
More |
Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)
The Southern District of California (San Diego)—with 19626 prosecutions as compared with 3347.5 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during June 2009.
The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.
The District of New Mexico ranked 2nd.
The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 6 five years ago.
Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd.
The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were
Utah , now ranked
9th
, and Southern District of Alabama (Mobile)
at 6th
In the same order, these districts ranked 23rd and 45th one year ago and 19th and 71st five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth
in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 37 percent—was
Arizona .
Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 51.9 percent—was
Southern District of Georgia (Savannah).
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the
largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 27.6 percent—was
Southern District of Alabama (Mobile).
But over the past five years,
South Dakota
showed the largest drop— 13.7 percent.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during June 2009 are shown in Table 4.
All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita.
Judge Micaela Alvarez in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 1st with 147 defendants in cases.
Judge Alvarezalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 2).
Judges Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico and George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 145 defendants in cases.
Judge Brack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 3).Judge Kazen appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 3) and five years ago (rank 1).