Convictions for February 2008

Number Latest Month 11,708
Percent Change from previous month 36.5
Percent Change from 1 year ago 16.9
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 44.0
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 9.7

Table 1: Criminal Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during February 2008 the government reported 11708 new convictions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 36.5% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2008 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of convictions was up (16.9 percent). Convictions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are up 44 percent from levels reported in 2003.

The growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in convictions is 9.7 percent instead of 44 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 6,492 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 5,821 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 7,202 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 5,819 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 6,013 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 5,645 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 5,764 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 5,826 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 6,134 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 6,047 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 5,323 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 4,996 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 6,384 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 5,504 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 6,495 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 5,946 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 6,794 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 5,889 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 6,442 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 6,207 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 6,656 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 6,749 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 5,379 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 5,665 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 6,433 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 6,517 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 7,702 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 7,029 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 6,177 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 6,371 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 6,316 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 5,916 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 8,014 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 6,264 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 5,539 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 7,392 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 7,231 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 7,371 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 9,237 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 8,401 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 8,770 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 8,324 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 7,377 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 8,555 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 7,604 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 6,337 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 5,977 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 6,909 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 6,865 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 6,736 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 8,837 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 7,369 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 8,470 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 8,768 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 8,175 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 9,536 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 9,879 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 7,757 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 6,982 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 7,170 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 8,079 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 7,852 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 9,825 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 7,611 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 8,563 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 8,724 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 7,791 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 9,255 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 9,330 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 7,696 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 6,869 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 6,595 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 7,617 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 7,976 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 8,750 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 8,300 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 8,262 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 8,533 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 7,103 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 8,112 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 9,744 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 7,992 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 7,354 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 8,483 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 8,578 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 11,708 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 6165.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 6044 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 6044.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 5866.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 5904.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 5789.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 5681.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 5785 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 5731.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 5791.5 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 5774.6666667 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 6019.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 6168.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 6178.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 6295.5 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 6322.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 6456.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 6220.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 6183 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 6181.5 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 6233.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 6407.5 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 6454.1666667 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 6587.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 6704.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 6685.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 6585.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 6637.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 6509.6666667 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 6403.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 6573.5 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 6726 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 6968.5 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 7172.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 7528.5 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 8067 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 8222.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 8246.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 8444 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 8171.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 7827.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 7362.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 7126.5 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 7041.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 6738 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 6943.5 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 7115.5 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 7531 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 7840.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 8059.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 8525.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 8699.5 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 8764.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 8516.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 8249.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 8233.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 7953.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 7944.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 7919.8333333 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 8183.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 8442.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 8394.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 8628.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 8545.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 8559.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 8277.5 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 7922.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 7893.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 7680.5 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 7583.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 7684.5 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 7916.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 8239.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 8154 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 8176.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 8342.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 8291 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 8139.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 8131.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 8377.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 8976.5
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Convictions over the last five years

The increase from the levels five years ago in convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of convictions of these matters in February 2008 was for "Immigration", accounting for 56.2 percent of convictions. Convictions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (12.9%), " Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (5.7%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (4%), "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (3.7%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (2.2%), "Assimilated Crimes" (2%). See Figure 2.

The lead investigative agency for convictions in February 2008 was DHS accounting for 62 percent of convictions. Other agencies with substantial numbers of convictions were: DEA (10% ), FBI (8%), ATF (6%), Local (2%). See Figure 3.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.84%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 56%  (56.23%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 13%  (12.93%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 13%  (12.93%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 13%  (12.93%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of convictions
agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 12%  (11.64%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 2%  (2.49%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 8%  (8.39%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 62%  (61.58%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 10%  (9.68%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 10%  (9.68%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 10%  (9.68%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.22%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.22%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.22%)
PIE3D chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 3: Convictions by Investigative Agency

Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In February 2008, 43 percent of cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in February the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 83.1 percent of all magistrate convictions in February.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (6.8%).

Convictions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during February 2008.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,353 1 2 2 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 1,021 2 1 1 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 727 3 3 3 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 564 4 4 4 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 368 5 5 5 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 139 6 6 6 More
18 USC 2113 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes 129 7 7 8 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 117 8 9 11 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 102 9 11 19 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 101 10 14 7 More

Table 2: Top charges for convictions

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846. "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions—up 43.8 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 that involves " Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—131.4 percent—was registered for convictions under " Material involving sexual exploitation of minors " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2252 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 16.1 percent—was Importation of controlled substances (Title 21 U.S.C Section 952 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 42.9 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In February 2008 the Justice Department said the government obtained 2677 convictions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of convictions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 convictions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
N Mexico 18,848 307 1 5 5 More
Cal, S 18,570 480 2 4 4 More
Texas, W 11,516 551 3 1 1 More
Arizona 10,353 532 4 3 3 More
S Dakota 8,901 58 5 47 69 More
Wyoming 8,854 38 6 67 80 More
Texas, S 8,681 579 7 2 2 More
W Virg, N 7,708 57 8 74 78 More
D. C. 5,778 28 9 39 35 More
Nebraska 5,429 80 10 26 27 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of New Mexico—with 18848 convictions as compared with 2677 convictions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during February 2008. The District of New Mexico was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 five years ago.

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego) ranked 2nd. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Nebraska , now ranked 10th , and Washington, D.C. (Washington) at 9th In the same order, these districts ranked 26th and 39th one year ago and 27th and 35th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of convictions compared to one year ago— 73.6 percent—was Northern District of West Virginia (Wheeling). This was the same district that had the largest increase— 138.2 %—when compared with five years ago.

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of convictions— 36.9 percent—was Washington, D.C. (Washington).  This was the same district that had the largest increase— 32.6 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases resulting in convictions of this type during February 2008 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 99 1 2 7 More
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 90 2 3 - More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 90 2 9 13 More
Bury, David C. Arizona 84 4 68 11 More
Briones, David Texas, W 83 5 4 1 More
Tagle, Hilda G. Texas, S 82 6 12 14 More
Zapata, Frank R. Arizona 77 7 56 16 More
Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 77 7 7 2 More
Hanen, Andrew S. Texas, S 74 9 9 33 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 66 10 1 - More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of convictions per capita.

  • Judge George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 1st with 99 convicted in convictions. Judge Kazen appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 2) and five years ago (rank 7).

  • Judges Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico and Randy Crane in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 90 convicted in convictions. Judge Brackalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 3).Judge Cranealso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 9).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2008, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page