Prosecutions for February 2008

Number Latest Month 13,527
Percent Change from previous month 45.2
Percent Change from 1 year ago 19.1
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 28.8
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) -9.0

Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during February 2008 the government reported 13527 new prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 45.2% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2008 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was up (19.1 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 28.8 percent from levels reported in 2003.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 6,853 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 7,438 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 9,282 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 7,997 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 8,503 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 7,786 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 7,767 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 8,280 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 7,638 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 7,537 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 6,857 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 6,754 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 7,241 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 7,127 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 8,324 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 9,010 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 8,626 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 7,791 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 8,358 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 7,804 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 8,310 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 8,269 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 7,456 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 7,375 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 7,875 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 8,519 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 9,095 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 8,684 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 8,809 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 8,035 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 8,531 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 7,858 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 8,177 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 8,589 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 7,168 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 9,481 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 8,670 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 8,512 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 11,695 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 11,501 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 10,191 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 10,355 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 9,310 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 10,753 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 11,243 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 8,473 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 8,083 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 8,249 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 8,073 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 8,279 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 10,706 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 9,513 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 10,150 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 10,358 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 9,173 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 10,597 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 11,840 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 8,906 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 8,559 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 8,221 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 8,471 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 8,316 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 10,605 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 8,609 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 9,167 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 9,886 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 8,860 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 9,840 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 10,791 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 8,594 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 8,125 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 7,753 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 8,186 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 8,269 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 10,621 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 9,548 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 10,174 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 9,622 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 8,668 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 10,480 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 11,831 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 9,312 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 8,619 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 8,989 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 9,314 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 13,527 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 7976.5 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 8128.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 8269.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 7995.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 7918.5 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 7644.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 7472.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 7384.5 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 7192.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 7306.6666667 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 7552.1666667 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 7847 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 8019.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 8206 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 8318.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 8316.5 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 8193 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 7998 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 7928.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 7848.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 7967.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 8098.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 8167.3333333 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 8392.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 8502.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 8612.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 8502 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 8349 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 8333.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 8059.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 8300.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 8323.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 8432.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 9019.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 9504.5 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 10008.333333 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 10154 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 10260.666667 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 10634.166667 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 10558.833333 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 10054.166667 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 9702.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 9351.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 9145.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 8733.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 8643.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 8817.1666667 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 9161.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 9513.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 9696.5 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 10082.833333 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 10271.833333 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 10170.666667 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 9905.5 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 9549.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 9432.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 9052.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 8846.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 8796.8333333 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 8898.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 9175.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 9240.5 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 9494.5 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 9525.5 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 9523 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 9349.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 8993.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 8881.5 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 8619.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 8591.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 8750.3333333 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 9091.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 9403.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 9483.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 9852.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 10053.833333 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 10014.5 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 9755.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 9649.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 9757.5 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 10265.333333
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Prosecutions over the last five years

The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in February 2008 was for "Immigration", accounting for 53.6 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (15.5%), " Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (5.5%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (3.4%), "Assimilated Crimes" (2.6%), "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (2.5%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (2.4%). See Figure 2.

The lead investigative agency for prosecutions in February 2008 was DHS accounting for 60 percent of prosecutions referred. Other agencies with substantial numbers of referrals were: FBI (9% ), DEA (8%), ATF (6%), Interior (3%). See Figure 3.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 31%  (30.92%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 54%  (53.6%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 15%  (15.48%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 15%  (15.48%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 15%  (15.48%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions
agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 14%  (14.13%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: Interior
percentage: 3%  (2.72%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 9%  (8.94%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 60%  (59.61%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 8%  (8.31%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 8%  (8.31%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 8%  (8.31%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.28%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.28%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (6.28%)
PIE3D chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 3: Prosecutions by Investigative Agency

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In February 2008, 56 percent of cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in February the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 52.7 percent of all magistrate filings in February.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (16.6%), "21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" (5.8%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during February 2008.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,078 1 2 3 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 1,064 2 1 1 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 559 3 4 4 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 472 4 3 2 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 309 5 5 5 More
18 USC 2113 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes 129 6 7 8 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 126 7 9 18 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 116 8 14 6 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 103 9 8 10 More
18 USC 1962 - RICO - prohibited activities 95 10 43 26 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922. "Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was the 4 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 54.5 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1962 that involves " RICO - prohibited activities ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—80.1 percent—was registered for prosecutions under " Material involving sexual exploitation of minors " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2252 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 24.1 percent—was Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US (Title 18 U.S.C Section 371 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions— 48.6 percent—was for filings where the lead charge was " Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. " (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 ).

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In February 2008 the Justice Department said the government brought 2399.2 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Cal, S 14,624 378 1 4 4 More
Texas, W 13,961 668 2 1 2 More
N Mexico 13,077 213 3 6 6 More
Montana 6,987 55 4 47 55 More
Nebraska 6,922 102 5 21 23 More
Mo, E 6,517 157 6 13 20 More
Ala, S 6,474 44 7 63 68 More
Texas, S 6,342 423 8 2 1 More
Tenn, W 5,611 72 9 25 34 More
D. C. 5,365 26 10 78 38 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego)—with 14624 prosecutions as compared with 2399.2 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during February 2008. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.

  • The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.

  • District of New Mexico is now ranking 3rd. The District of New Mexico was ranked 6 a year ago, while it was ranked 6 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis), now ranked 6th , and Nebraska at 5th In the same order, these districts ranked 13th and 21st one year ago and 20th and 23rd five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 41.4 percent—was Southern District of Alabama (Mobile). This was the same district that had the largest increase— 42.1 %—when compared with five years ago.

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 13.5 percent—was Western District of Tennessee (Memphis).  But over the past five years, Washington, D.C. (Washington) showed the largest drop— 59.5 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during February 2008 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 109 1 6 2 More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 99 2 5 830 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 92 3 7 815 More
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 87 4 2 678 More
Briones, David Texas, W 79 5 4 1 More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 69 6 8 7 More
Garaufis, Nicholas N. Y., E 67 7 270 133 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 61 8 1 - More
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 60 9 3 6 More
Junell, Robert A. Texas, W 56 10 11 184 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 9 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita, while the remaining 1 judges were from other districts.

  • Judge Philip Ray Martinez in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 1st with 109 defendants in cases. Judge Martinez appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 6) and five years ago (rank 2).

  • Judge Frank Montalvo in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd with 99 defendants in cases. Judge Montalvoalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 5).

  • Judge Kathleen Cardone in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 3rd with 92 defendants in cases. Judge Cardonealso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 7).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2008, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page