Prosecutions for April 2008

Number Latest Month 15,984
Percent Change from previous month 10.0
Percent Change from 1 year ago 31.2
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 40.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) -8.5

Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during April 2008 the government reported 15984 new prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 10% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2008 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was up (31.2 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 40.6 percent from levels reported in 2003.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 6,853 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 7,438 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 9,282 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 7,997 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 8,503 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 7,786 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 7,767 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 8,280 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 7,638 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 7,537 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 6,857 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 6,754 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 7,241 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 7,127 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 8,324 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 9,010 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 8,626 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 7,791 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 8,358 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 7,804 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 8,310 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 8,269 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 7,456 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 7,375 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 7,875 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 8,519 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 9,096 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 8,684 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 8,809 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 8,035 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 8,531 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 7,858 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 8,177 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 8,589 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 7,168 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 9,482 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 8,671 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 8,512 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 11,695 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 11,501 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 10,191 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 10,355 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 9,310 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 10,754 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 11,243 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 8,473 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 8,083 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 8,249 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 8,073 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 8,279 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 10,706 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 9,513 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 10,152 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 10,362 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 9,173 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 10,597 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 11,840 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 8,908 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 8,559 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 8,225 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 8,471 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 8,317 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 10,607 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 8,609 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 9,167 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 9,890 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 8,859 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 9,838 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 10,793 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 8,594 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 8,126 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 7,760 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 8,187 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 8,270 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 10,622 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 9,545 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 10,178 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 9,625 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 8,671 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 10,502 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 11,848 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 9,304 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 8,594 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 8,902 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 9,067 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 11,835 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 14,537 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 15,984 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 7976.5 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 8128.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 8269.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 7995.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 7918.5 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 7644.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 7472.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 7384.5 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 7192.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 7306.6666667 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 7552.1666667 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 7847 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 8019.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 8206 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 8318.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 8316.5 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 8193 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 7998 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 7928.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 7848.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 7967.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 8098.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 8167.5 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 8393 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 8503 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 8612.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 8502.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 8349 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 8333.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 8059.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 8300.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 8324.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 8433.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 9019.5 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 9504.8333333 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 10008.666667 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 10154.166667 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 10260.666667 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 10634.333333 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 10559 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 10054.333333 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 9703 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 9352 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 9145.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 8733.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 8643.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 8817.1666667 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 9162 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 9514.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 9697.5 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 10083.833333 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 10272.833333 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 10172 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 9906.5 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 9550.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 9433.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 9053.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 8847.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 8798 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 8899.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 9176.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 9241.5 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 9495 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 9526 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 9523.5 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 9350 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 8995 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 8883 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 8621.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 8593.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 8751.6666667 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 9093.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 9404.5 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 9485.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 9857.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 10061.5 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 10021.333333 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 9757.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 9636.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 9702.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 9925 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 10373.166667 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 11486.5
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Prosecutions over the last five years

The increase from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in April 2008 was for "Immigration", accounting for 58.3 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (12.9%), " Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (5.2%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (3.3%), "Assimilated Crimes" (3%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (2.3%). See Figure 2.

The lead investigative agency for prosecutions in April 2008 was DHS accounting for 64 percent of prosecutions referred. Other agencies with substantial numbers of referrals were: DEA (8% ), FBI (7%), ATF (6%), Defense (3%). See Figure 3.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 29%  (28.8%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Immigration
percentage: 58%  (58.31%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 13%  (12.89%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 13%  (12.89%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 13%  (12.89%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions
agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 13%  (12.94%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 7%  (6.76%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: Defense
percentage: 3%  (2.95%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 64%  (63.61%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 8%  (8.15%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 8%  (8.15%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 8%  (8.15%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (5.59%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (5.59%) agenrevgrp: ATF
percentage: 6%  (5.59%)
PIE3D chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 3: Prosecutions by Investigative Agency

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In April 2008, 57 percent of cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in April the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 57 percent of all magistrate filings in April.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (14%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during April 2008.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,523 1 2 3 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 1,075 2 1 1 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 618 3 3 2 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 594 4 4 4 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 429 5 5 5 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 227 6 12 6 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 141 7 14 14 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 116 8 7 10 More
18 USC 2113 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes 111 9 8 8 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 110 10 6 7 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846. "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 64.4 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 that involves " Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—57.9 percent—was registered for prosecutions under " Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 27.3 percent—was Importation of controlled substances (Title 21 U.S.C Section 952 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 46.5 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In April 2008 the Justice Department said the government brought 2778.4 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
N Mexico 17,067 278 1 6 6 More
Cal, S 16,094 416 2 4 4 More
Texas, W 14,546 696 3 1 1 More
Texas, S 12,729 849 4 2 2 More
S Dakota 7,520 49 5 44 51 More
Montana 6,606 52 6 52 48 More
Arizona 5,935 305 7 3 3 More
Alaska 5,552 31 8 85 75 More
N Dakota 5,095 27 9 74 84 More
D. C. 4,540 22 10 82 40 More
La, M 4,540 29 10 80 72 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of New Mexico—with 17067 prosecutions as compared with 2778.4 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during April 2008. The District of New Mexico was ranked 6 a year ago, while it was ranked 6 five years ago.

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego) ranked 2nd. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were South Dakota , now ranked 5th , and Montana at 6th In the same order, these districts ranked 44th and 52nd one year ago and 51st and 48th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 45.7 percent—was Washington, D.C. (Washington). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 23.8 percent—was North Dakota .

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 26.2 percent—was Arizona .  But over the past five years, Washington, D.C. (Washington) showed the largest drop— 53.1 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during April 2008 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 118 1 3 418 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 114 2 1 - More
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 107 3 2 5 More
Junell, Robert A. Texas, W 104 4 9 53 More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 93 5 8 8 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 92 6 6 807 More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 91 7 4 823 More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 89 8 10 7 More
Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 83 9 5 1 More
Hanen, Andrew S. Texas, S 82 10 11 11 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita.

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 1st with 118 defendants in cases. Judge Brackalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 3).

  • Judge Micaela Alvarez in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 114 defendants in cases. Judge Alvarezalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 1).

  • Judge George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 107 defendants in cases. Judge Kazen appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 2) and five years ago (rank 5).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2008, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page