Convictions for July 2009

Referring Agency: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Number Latest Month 1,067
Percent Change from previous month 1.6
Percent Change from 1 year ago 2.4
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) -6.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) -5.6

Table 1: Criminal Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during July 2009 the government reported 1067 new convictions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 1.6% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2009 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of convictions was up (2.4 percent). Convictions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are down 6.6 percent from levels reported in 2004.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 1,243 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 1,114 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 1,355 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 1,089 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 1,181 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 1,042 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 1,086 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 1,060 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,206 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,224 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 1,070 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 973 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,218 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 995 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 1,225 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 1,109 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 1,283 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 1,157 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 1,166 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 1,117 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 1,126 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 1,281 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 1,105 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 981 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 1,073 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 1,103 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 1,264 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 1,228 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 891 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 969 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 1,078 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 936 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 1,256 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 995 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 894 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 1,005 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 911 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 1,194 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 1,266 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 972 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 931 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 1,029 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 1,025 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 943 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 1,111 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 706 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 678 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 896 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 984 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 937 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 1,332 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 1,058 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 1,018 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 1,122 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 1,022 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 1,087 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 1,269 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 953 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 895 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 892 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 1,087 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 1,004 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 1,214 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 886 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 1,033 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 1,035 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 903 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 1,070 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 1,206 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 944 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 873 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 872 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 938 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 906 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 1,105 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 851 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 1,124 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 1,041 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 791 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 943 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 1,045 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 930 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 762 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 697 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 908 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 913 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 1,064 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 1,015 FYMONDT: May2008
_FREQ_: 994 FYMONDT: Jun2008
_FREQ_: 879 FYMONDT: Jul2008
_FREQ_: 987 FYMONDT: Aug2008
_FREQ_: 999 FYMONDT: Sep2008
_FREQ_: 1,217 FYMONDT: Oct2008
_FREQ_: 934 FYMONDT: Nov2008
_FREQ_: 721 FYMONDT: Dec2008
_FREQ_: 889 FYMONDT: Jan2009
_FREQ_: 851 FYMONDT: Feb2009
_FREQ_: 1,018 FYMONDT: Mar2009
_FREQ_: 1,078 FYMONDT: Apr2009
_FREQ_: 891 FYMONDT: May2009
_FREQ_: 888 FYMONDT: Jun2009
_FREQ_: 1,050 FYMONDT: Jul2009
_FREQ_: 1,067 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 1170.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 1144.5 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 1135.5 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 1110.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 1133.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 1114.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1103.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1125.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1114.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1117.5 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 1098.3333333 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 1133.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 1164.5 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 1155.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 1176.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 1159.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 1188.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 1158.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 1129.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 1113.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 1111.5 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 1134.5 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 1125.6666667 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 1090 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 1088 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 1088.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 1061 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 1059.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 1020.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 1021.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 1027.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 999.5 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 1042.5 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 1044.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 1040.3333333 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 1046.5 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 1050.5 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 1069.5 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 1027.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 1001.8333333 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 957.5 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 915.33333333 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 893.16666667 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 886.33333333 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 885.33333333 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 922.16666667 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 980.83333333 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 1037.5 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 1075.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 1081.5 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 1106.5 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 1096 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 1078.5 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 1058 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 1019.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 1030.5 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 1016.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 1007.5 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 996.33333333 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 1019.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 1043.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 1012.5 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 1023.5 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 1022.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 1031.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 1005.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 978 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 983.83333333 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 956.5 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 939.66666667 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 924.16666667 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 966 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 994.16666667 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 969.66666667 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 975.83333333 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 965.83333333 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 979 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 918.66666667 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 861.33333333 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 880.83333333 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 875.83333333 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 879 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 893.16666667 FYMONDT: May2008
moveave: 931.83333333 FYMONDT: Jun2008
moveave: 962.16666667 FYMONDT: Jul2008
moveave: 975.33333333 FYMONDT: Aug2008
moveave: 989.66666667 FYMONDT: Sep2008
moveave: 1015.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2008
moveave: 1001.6666667 FYMONDT: Nov2008
moveave: 956.16666667 FYMONDT: Dec2008
moveave: 957.83333333 FYMONDT: Jan2009
moveave: 935.16666667 FYMONDT: Feb2009
moveave: 938.33333333 FYMONDT: Mar2009
moveave: 915.16666667 FYMONDT: Apr2009
moveave: 908 FYMONDT: May2009
moveave: 935.83333333 FYMONDT: Jun2009
moveave: 962.66666667 FYMONDT: Jul2009
moveave: 998.66666667
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Monthly trends in convictions

The leveling out from the levels five years ago in convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of convictions of these matters in July 2009 was for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking", accounting for 11.6 percent of convictions. Convictions were also filed for "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (11.4%), " Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (11.1%), "Bank Robbery" (10.3%), "Project Safe Childhood" (6.8%), "Fraud-Financial Institution" (5.6%), "Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (5.1%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (4.1%), "Violence-Indian Country" (3.5%) , "Fraud-Health Care" (3.2%), "Violence-Other" (3.1%), "Fraud-Other" (2.5%). See Figure 2.

progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.43%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 77%  (76.94%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 12%  (11.62%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 12%  (11.62%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 12%  (11.62%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of convictions

Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In July 2009, n defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

Convictions in U.S. District Courts

In July 2009, 1062 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during July there were an additional 0 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during July.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during July 2009referred by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 123 1 3 3 More
18 USC 2113 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes 115 2 1 2 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 113 3 2 1 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 48 4 4 8 More
18 USC 1341 - Mail Fraud - Frauds and swindles 46 5 6 5 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 35 6 11 11 More
18 USC 1344 - Bank fraud 35 6 5 4 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 30 8 7 6 More
18 USC 1349 - Mail Fraud - Attempt and Conspiracy 25 9 16 105 More
18 USC 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television 23 10 8 7 More
18 USC 1347 - Health Care Fraud 23 10 13 15 More

Table 2: Top charges for convictions

  • "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" (Title 21 U.S.C Section 841) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" (Title 21 U.S.C Section 841) was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bank robbery and incidental crimes" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 2113. "Bank robbery and incidental crimes" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 2113 was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846. "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions—up 34 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1349 that involves " Mail Fraud - Attempt and Conspiracy ". This was the same statute that had the largest increase—1575 %—when compared with five years ago.

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 16.1 percent—was Mail Fraud - Frauds and swindles (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1341 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in convictions— 58.7 percent—was for convictions where the lead charge was " Bank fraud " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1344 ).

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In July 2009 the Justice Department said the government obtained 426.6 convictions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of convictions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 convictions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
D. C. 2,460 12 1 25 35 More
S Dakota 2,131 14 2 31 25 More
Mo, E 2,038 49 3 34 48 More
Wyoming 1,404 6 4 61 75 More
Montana 1,394 11 5 37 20 More
N. Y., S 1,231 52 6 3 3 More
N Mexico 1,174 19 7 30 27 More
La, E 1,034 12 8 37 51 More
Wisc, E 905 25 9 39 41 More
Okla, W 891 14 10 36 62 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of Washington, D.C. (Washington)—with 2460 convictions as compared with 426.6 convictions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during July 2009.

  • The District of South Dakota ranked 2nd.

  • Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis) is now ranking 3rd.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Washington, D.C. (Washington), now ranked 1st , and New Mexico at 7th In the same order, these districts ranked 25th and 30th one year ago and 35th and 27th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of convictions compared to one year ago— 50 percent—was South Dakota . Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 54.5 percent—was Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis).

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of convictions— 41 percent—was Western District of Oklahoma (Oklahoma City).  But over the past five years, Montana showed the largest drop— 30.7 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases resulting in convictions of this type during July 2009 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank  
Sippel, Rodney W. Mo, E 13 1 More
Skretny, William M. N. Y., W 13 1 More
O`Malley, Kathleen M. Ohio, N 9 3 More
Gardner, James Knoll Penn, E 9 3 More
Wooten, Terry L. S Car 9 3 More
Griesbach, William C. Wisc, E 9 3 More
Webber, E. Richard Mo, E 8 7 More
Rice, Walter Herbert Ohio, S 8 7 More
Crabb, Barbara Brandriff Wisc, W 8 7 More
Bell, Robert Holmes Mich, W 7 10 More
Jackson, Carol E. Mo, E 7 10 More
Bartle, Harvey III Penn, E 7 10 More
Anderson, George Ross Jr. S Car 7 10 More
Anderson, Joseph Fletcher Jr. S Car 7 10 More
Stewart, Brian Theadore Utah 7 10 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 4 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of convictions per capita, while the remaining 11 judges were from other districts. (Because of ties, there were a total of 15 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)

  • Judges Rodney W. Sippel in the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis) and William M. Skretny in the Western District of New York (Buffalo) ranked 1st with 13 convicted in convictions.

  • Judges Kathleen M. O'Malley in the Northern District of Ohio (Cleveland), James Knoll Gardner in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia), Terry L. Wooten in the District of South Carolina and William C. Griesbach in the Eastern District of Wisconsin ( Milwaukee) ranked 3rd with 9 convicted in convictions.

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2009, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page