Prosecutions for August 2007

Referring Agency: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Number Latest Month 1,125
Percent Change from previous month 14.1
Percent Change from 1 year ago -5.0
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) -32.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) -34.5

Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during August 2007 the government reported 1125 new prosecutions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 14.1% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2007 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was down (-5 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are down 32.6 percent from levels reported in 2002.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 1,431 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 1,580 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 1,858 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 1,559 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 1,826 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 1,579 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 1,646 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 1,663 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,505 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,471 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 1,241 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 1,276 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,469 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 1,274 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 1,608 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 1,610 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 1,560 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 1,434 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 1,677 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 1,487 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 1,635 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 1,461 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 1,230 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 1,173 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 1,428 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 1,472 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 1,518 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 1,493 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 1,433 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 1,226 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 1,343 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 1,208 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 1,379 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 1,463 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 1,205 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 1,197 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 1,336 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 1,261 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 1,455 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 1,381 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 1,239 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 1,331 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 1,060 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 1,292 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 1,372 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 1,166 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 1,042 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 918 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 1,170 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 1,139 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 1,392 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 1,156 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 1,200 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 1,188 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 977 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 1,362 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 1,434 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 1,138 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 946 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 937 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 996 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 1,032 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 1,218 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 998 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 1,135 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 1,213 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 1,005 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 1,078 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 1,001 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 1,092 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 1,096 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 881 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 914 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 881 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 1,089 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 980 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 1,027 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 1,108 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 986 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 1,125 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 1638.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 1674.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 1688.5 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 1629.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 1615 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 1517.5 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1467 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1437.5 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1372.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1389.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 1413 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 1466.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 1492.5 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 1527.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 1562.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 1567.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 1542.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 1487.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 1443.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 1402.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 1399.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 1380.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 1385.6666667 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 1419.5 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 1428.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 1414.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 1370.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 1347 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 1342 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 1304 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 1299.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 1298 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 1306.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 1319.5 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 1305.8333333 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 1311.5 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 1333.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 1287.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 1293 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 1279.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 1243.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 1210.5 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 1141.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 1160 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 1134.5 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 1137.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 1136.1666667 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 1162.5 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 1207.5 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 1175.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 1212.5 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 1219.5 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 1216.5 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 1174.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 1132.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 1135.5 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 1080.5 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 1044.5 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 1021.1666667 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 1052.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 1098.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 1100.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 1107.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 1071.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 1087.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 1080.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 1025.5 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 1010.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 977.5 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 992.16666667 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 973.5 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 962 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 999.83333333 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 1011.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 1052.5
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Prosecutions over the last five years

The decrease from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in August 2007 was for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking", accounting for 15 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (11.5%), " Bank Robbery" (11.4%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (8.8%), "Fraud-Financial Institution" (7.2%), "Other-Not Specified" (5.6%), "Pornography-Child" (3.3%), "All Other Violent Crime" (3%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (3%), " Organized Crime-Emerging Organization" (3%), "Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (2.8%), "Violent Crime in Indian Country" (2.5%), "Fugitive Crimes" (2.4%), "Fraud-Other" (2.3%). See Figure 2.

progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 11%  (11.47%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 74%  (73.51%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 15%  (15.02%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 15%  (15.02%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 15%  (15.02%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In August 2007, 21 percent of cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in August the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1073 involving the "Flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony". This was the lead charge for 15.9 percent of all magistrate filings in August.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "18 USC 2113 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes" (14.6%), "21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" (8.4%), "21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy" (6.7%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during August 2007referred by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
18 USC 2113 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes 107 1 1 2 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 104 2 3 3 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 81 3 2 1 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 53 4 5 9 More
18 USC 1341 - Mail Fraud - Frauds and swindles 51 5 7 5 More
18 USC 1344 - Bank fraud 31 6 4 4 More
18 USC 1955 - Prohibition of illegal gambling businesses 22 7 26 68 More
18 USC 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television 20 8 8 8 More
18 USC 1951 - Hobbs Act 17 9 10 10 More
18 USC 1962 - RICO - prohibited activities 17 9 20 11 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Bank robbery and incidental crimes" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2113) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Bank robbery and incidental crimes" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2113) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846. "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 40.9 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1962 that involves " RICO - prohibited activities ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—150 percent—was registered for prosecutions under " Prohibition of illegal gambling businesses " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1955 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 33.8 percent—was Bank fraud (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1344 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 67.2 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In August 2007 the Justice Department said the government brought 362.1 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
S Dakota 2,802 18 1 20 53 More
Montana 1,813 14 2 31 29 More
Alaska 1,465 8 3 83 82 More
Ill, S 1,414 15 4 75 52 More
N Car, W 1,397 31 5 16 51 More
Okla, W 1,300 20 6 51 65 More
Idaho 1,120 13 7 49 66 More
D. C. 1,084 5 8 40 49 More
Tenn, W 1,020 13 9 20 49 More
La, E 981 14 10 56 41 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of South Dakota—with 2802 prosecutions as compared with .prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during August 2007.

  • The District of Montana ranked 2nd.

  • District of Alaska is now ranking 3rd.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Western District of North Carolina (Asheville), now ranked 5th , and South Dakota at 1st In the same order, these districts ranked 16th and 20th one year ago and 51st and 53rd five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 160 percent—was Alaska . This was the same district that had the largest increase— 105.3 %—when compared with five years ago.

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 65 percent—was Washington, D.C. (Washington).  This was the same district that had the largest increase— 68.2 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during August 2007 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Perez-Gimenez, Juan Manuel Puer Rico 45 1 254 383 More
Thornburg, Lacy Herman N Car, W 24 2 35 14 More
Young, Richard L. Ind, S 18 3 454 226 More
Stearns, Richard Gaylore Mass 16 4 373 620 More
Dominguez, Daniel R. Puer Rico 11 5 31 120 More
Tagle, Hilda G. Texas, S 11 5 540 177 More
Atlas, Nancy Friedman Texas, S 10 7 - 566 More
Marbley, Algenon L. Ohio, S 9 8 109 620 More
Friot, Stephen P. Okla, W 9 8 373 485 More
Lodge, Edward J. Idaho 8 10 5 41 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 3 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita, while the remaining 7 judges were from other districts.

  • Judge Juan Manuel Perez-Gimenez in the District of Puerto Rico ranked 1st with 45 defendants in cases.

  • Judge Lacy Herman Thornburg in the Western District of North Carolina (Asheville) ranked 2nd with 24 defendants in cases.

  • Judge Richard L. Young in the Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis) ranked 3rd with 18 defendants in cases.

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2007, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page