Convictions for July 2009

Referring Agency: Drug Enforcement Administration

Number Latest Month 1,226
Percent Change from previous month 1.1
Percent Change from 1 year ago 1.6
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) -1.4
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 0.4

Table 1: Criminal Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during July 2009 the government reported 1226 new convictions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Drug Enforcement Administration. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 1.1% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2009 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of convictions was only slightlyup (1.6 percent). Convictions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are down 1.4 percent from levels reported in 2004.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 1,067 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 1,053 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 1,262 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 1,084 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 1,092 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 1,048 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 1,062 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 1,039 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,157 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,072 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 964 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 848 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,216 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 950 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 1,180 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 966 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 1,203 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 1,036 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 1,099 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 1,079 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 1,339 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 1,131 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 928 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 991 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 1,177 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 1,233 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 1,282 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 1,245 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 1,103 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 1,061 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 1,079 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 1,104 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 1,395 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 1,095 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 888 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 1,031 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 1,048 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 1,159 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 1,459 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 1,166 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 1,174 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 1,207 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 1,069 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 1,198 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 1,158 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 1,004 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 888 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 927 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 1,089 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 939 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 1,420 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 1,119 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 1,235 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 1,272 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 1,201 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 1,387 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 1,535 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 993 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 954 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 1,005 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 1,219 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 1,251 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 1,558 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 1,137 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 1,489 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 1,378 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 1,085 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 1,430 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 1,356 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 1,076 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 1,022 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 987 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 1,153 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 1,251 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 1,338 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 1,181 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 1,241 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 1,272 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 1,087 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 1,192 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 1,423 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 1,029 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 926 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 1,016 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 1,135 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 1,075 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 1,209 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 1,111 FYMONDT: May2008
_FREQ_: 1,160 FYMONDT: Jun2008
_FREQ_: 1,180 FYMONDT: Jul2008
_FREQ_: 1,287 FYMONDT: Aug2008
_FREQ_: 1,063 FYMONDT: Sep2008
_FREQ_: 1,485 FYMONDT: Oct2008
_FREQ_: 1,132 FYMONDT: Nov2008
_FREQ_: 876 FYMONDT: Dec2008
_FREQ_: 993 FYMONDT: Jan2009
_FREQ_: 952 FYMONDT: Feb2009
_FREQ_: 1,148 FYMONDT: Mar2009
_FREQ_: 1,367 FYMONDT: Apr2009
_FREQ_: 1,166 FYMONDT: May2009
_FREQ_: 1,015 FYMONDT: Jun2009
_FREQ_: 1,213 FYMONDT: Jul2009
_FREQ_: 1,226 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 1101 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 1100.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 1097.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 1080.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 1078.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 1057 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1023.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1049.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1034.5 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1038.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 1020.6666667 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 1060.5 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 1091.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 1072.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 1093.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 1120.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 1147.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 1102 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 1094.5 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 1107.5 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 1133.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 1123.6666667 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 1142.6666667 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 1171.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 1183.5 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 1167.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 1145.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 1164.5 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 1139.5 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 1103.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 1098.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 1093.5 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 1102.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 1113.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 1125.1666667 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 1172.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 1202.1666667 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 1205.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 1212.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 1162 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 1135 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 1087.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 1040.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 1044 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 1000.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 1044.5 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 1063.6666667 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 1121.5 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 1179 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 1197.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 1272.3333333 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 1291.5 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 1270.5 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 1223.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 1179.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 1182.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 1159.5 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 1163.3333333 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 1187.3333333 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 1276.5 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 1338.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 1316.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 1346.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 1312.5 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 1302.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 1224.5 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 1159.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 1170.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 1140.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 1137.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 1155.3333333 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 1191.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 1239.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 1228.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 1218.5 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 1232.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 1207.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 1154.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 1112.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 1120.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 1100.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 1065 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 1078.6666667 FYMONDT: May2008
moveave: 1117.6666667 FYMONDT: Jun2008
moveave: 1145 FYMONDT: Jul2008
moveave: 1170.3333333 FYMONDT: Aug2008
moveave: 1168.3333333 FYMONDT: Sep2008
moveave: 1214.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2008
moveave: 1217.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2008
moveave: 1170.5 FYMONDT: Dec2008
moveave: 1139.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2009
moveave: 1083.5 FYMONDT: Feb2009
moveave: 1097.6666667 FYMONDT: Mar2009
moveave: 1078 FYMONDT: Apr2009
moveave: 1083.6666667 FYMONDT: May2009
moveave: 1106.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2009
moveave: 1143.5 FYMONDT: Jul2009
moveave: 1189.1666667
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Monthly trends in convictions

The leveling out from the levels five years ago in convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of convictions of these matters in July 2009 was for "Drugs-Drug Trafficking", accounting for 50.6 percent of convictions. Convictions were also filed for "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (28.6%), " Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (17.1%). See Figure 2.

progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 21%  (20.8%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Organized Crime Task For
percentage: 29%  (28.63%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 51%  (50.57%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 51%  (50.57%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 51%  (50.57%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 51%  (50.57%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 51%  (50.57%) progcatlabel: Drugs-Drug Trafficking
percentage: 51%  (50.57%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of convictions

Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In July 2009, n defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

Convictions in U.S. District Courts

In July 2009, 1225 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during July there were an additional 0 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during July.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during July 2009referred by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 484 1 1 1 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 462 2 2 2 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 11 3 4 5 More
21 :00084 11 3 9 - More
21 USC 843 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts C 7 5 6 6 More
18 USC 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments 4 6 5 8 More
18 USC 2118 - Robberies/burglaries w/controlled substances 4 6 13 20 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 4 6 10 3 More
18 USC 1201 - Kidnaping 3 9 - - More
21 USC 963 - Attempt and conspiracy 3 9 3 4 More

Table 2: Top charges for convictions

  • "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" (Title 21 U.S.C Section 841) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" (Title 21 U.S.C Section 841) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846. "Attempt and conspiracy" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 846 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd were "Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 and "21 :00084" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 84. "Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was the 5 most frequently invoked 5 years ago.."21 :00084" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 84 was ranked 9 a year ago.

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions—up 100 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 84 that involves "21 :00084 ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—175 percent—was registered for convictions under " Robberies/burglaries w/controlled substances " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2118 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 43.2 percent—was Laundering of monetary instruments (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1956 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in convictions— 81 percent—was for convictions where the lead charge was " Importation of controlled substances " (Title 21 U.S.C Section 952 ).

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In July 2009 the Justice Department said the government obtained 492 convictions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of convictions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 convictions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
N Mexico 2,595 42 1 8 9 More
Mo, E 1,830 44 2 15 14 More
Texas, W 1,819 87 3 1 1 More
Ala, S 1,781 12 4 28 57 More
Vermont 1,740 9 5 75 63 More
La, E 1,636 19 6 43 58 More
Texas, E 1,586 44 7 13 11 More
S Dakota 1,370 9 8 68 58 More
N Dakota 1,318 7 9 40 94 More
Iowa, N 1,286 14 10 58 27 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of New Mexico—with 2595 convictions as compared with 492 convictions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during July 2009. The District of New Mexico was ranked 8 a year ago, while it was ranked 9 five years ago.

  • The Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis) ranked 2nd.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Eastern District of Texas (Tyler), now ranked 7th , and Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis) at 2nd In the same order, these districts ranked 13th and 15th one year ago and 11th and 14th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of convictions compared to one year ago— 118.2 percent—was Northern District of Iowa (Cedar Rapids). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 4200 percent—was North Dakota .

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of convictions— 52.4 percent—was Southern District of Alabama (Mobile).  But over the past five years, South Dakota showed the largest drop— 19.5 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases resulting in convictions of this type during July 2009 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Yeakel, Earl Leroy III Texas, W 38 1 20 377 More
Crone, Marcia A. Texas, E 23 2 14 431 More
Jack, Janis Graham Texas, S 20 3 2 4 More
Head, Hayden Wilson Jr. Texas, S 18 4 17 2 More
Zapata, Frank R. Arizona 15 5 22 33 More
Antoon, John II Fla, M 12 6 256 286 More
Perry, Catherine D. Mo, E 12 6 224 286 More
Autrey, Henry Edward Mo, E 12 6 75 71 More
Vazquez, Martha Alicia N Mexico 12 6 418 104 More
Collins, Raner Christercunean Arizona 11 10 6 28 More
Vratil, Kathryn Hoefer Kansas 11 10 418 254 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 5 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of convictions per capita, while the remaining 6 judges were from other districts. (Because of ties, there were a total of 11 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)

  • Judge Earl Leroy Yeakel III in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 1st with 38 convicted in convictions.

  • Judge Marcia A. Crone in the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler) ranked 2nd with 23 convicted in convictions.

  • Judge Janis Graham Jack in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 20 convicted in convictions. Judge Jack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 2) and five years ago (rank 4).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2009, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page