Prosecutions for July 2009

Referring Agency: Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

Number Latest Month 732
Percent Change from previous month -0.4
Percent Change from 1 year ago -1.2
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) -8.9
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) -11.9

Table 1: Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during July 2009 the government reported 732 new prosecutions for these matters. Those cases were referred by the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 0.4% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2009 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was only slightlydown (-1.2 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are down 8.9 percent from levels reported in 2004.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 436 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 484 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 604 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 492 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 565 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 483 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 622 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 510 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 514 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 571 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 515 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 503 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 516 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 577 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 597 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 696 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 830 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 681 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 708 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 591 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 703 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 783 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 711 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 611 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 702 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 714 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 925 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 947 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 890 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 812 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 903 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 911 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 967 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 844 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 719 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 811 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 672 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 789 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 1,067 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 1,038 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 871 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 874 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 787 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 909 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 859 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 865 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 735 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 735 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 786 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 836 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 1,090 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 995 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 893 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 885 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 767 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 906 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 977 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 723 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 819 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 718 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 856 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 751 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 906 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 730 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 830 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 931 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 833 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 961 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 864 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 753 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 710 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 769 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 663 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 746 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 1,029 FYMONDT: Apr2007
_FREQ_: 876 FYMONDT: May2007
_FREQ_: 929 FYMONDT: Jun2007
_FREQ_: 879 FYMONDT: Jul2007
_FREQ_: 721 FYMONDT: Aug2007
_FREQ_: 887 FYMONDT: Sep2007
_FREQ_: 893 FYMONDT: Oct2007
_FREQ_: 671 FYMONDT: Nov2007
_FREQ_: 841 FYMONDT: Dec2007
_FREQ_: 662 FYMONDT: Jan2008
_FREQ_: 767 FYMONDT: Feb2008
_FREQ_: 820 FYMONDT: Mar2008
_FREQ_: 811 FYMONDT: Apr2008
_FREQ_: 867 FYMONDT: May2008
_FREQ_: 955 FYMONDT: Jun2008
_FREQ_: 801 FYMONDT: Jul2008
_FREQ_: 748 FYMONDT: Aug2008
_FREQ_: 876 FYMONDT: Sep2008
_FREQ_: 834 FYMONDT: Oct2008
_FREQ_: 837 FYMONDT: Nov2008
_FREQ_: 701 FYMONDT: Dec2008
_FREQ_: 708 FYMONDT: Jan2009
_FREQ_: 698 FYMONDT: Feb2009
_FREQ_: 818 FYMONDT: Mar2009
_FREQ_: 859 FYMONDT: Apr2009
_FREQ_: 959 FYMONDT: May2009
_FREQ_: 841 FYMONDT: Jun2009
_FREQ_: 735 FYMONDT: Jul2009
_FREQ_: 732 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 510.66666667 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 541.66666667 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 546 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 531 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 544.16666667 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 535.83333333 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 539.16666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 521.5 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 532.66666667 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 546.5 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 567.33333333 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 619.83333333 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 649.5 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 681.5 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 683.83333333 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 701.5 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 716 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 696.16666667 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 684.5 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 683.5 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 704 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 741 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 768.33333333 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 798.16666667 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 831.66666667 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 865.16666667 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 898 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 905 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 887.83333333 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 859.33333333 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 859.16666667 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 820.66666667 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 800.33333333 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 817 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 849.33333333 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 874.66666667 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 885.16666667 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 904.33333333 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 924.33333333 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 889.66666667 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 860.83333333 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 838.16666667 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 815 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 814.83333333 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 802.66666667 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 841.16666667 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 862.83333333 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 889.16666667 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 914.16666667 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 911 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 922.66666667 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 903.83333333 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 858.5 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 846.16666667 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 818.33333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 833.16666667 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 807.33333333 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 795.5 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 796.66666667 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 798.5 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 834 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 830.16666667 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 865.16666667 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 858.16666667 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 862 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 842 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 815 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 786.66666667 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 750.83333333 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 778.33333333 FYMONDT: Apr2007
moveave: 798.83333333 FYMONDT: May2007
moveave: 835.33333333 FYMONDT: Jun2007
moveave: 853.66666667 FYMONDT: Jul2007
moveave: 863.33333333 FYMONDT: Aug2007
moveave: 886.83333333 FYMONDT: Sep2007
moveave: 864.16666667 FYMONDT: Oct2007
moveave: 830 FYMONDT: Nov2007
moveave: 815.33333333 FYMONDT: Dec2007
moveave: 779.16666667 FYMONDT: Jan2008
moveave: 786.83333333 FYMONDT: Feb2008
moveave: 775.66666667 FYMONDT: Mar2008
moveave: 762 FYMONDT: Apr2008
moveave: 794.66666667 FYMONDT: May2008
moveave: 813.66666667 FYMONDT: Jun2008
moveave: 836.83333333 FYMONDT: Jul2008
moveave: 833.66666667 FYMONDT: Aug2008
moveave: 843 FYMONDT: Sep2008
moveave: 846.83333333 FYMONDT: Oct2008
moveave: 841.83333333 FYMONDT: Nov2008
moveave: 799.5 FYMONDT: Dec2008
moveave: 784 FYMONDT: Jan2009
moveave: 775.66666667 FYMONDT: Feb2009
moveave: 766 FYMONDT: Mar2009
moveave: 770.16666667 FYMONDT: Apr2009
moveave: 790.5 FYMONDT: May2009
moveave: 813.83333333 FYMONDT: Jun2009
moveave: 818.33333333 FYMONDT: Jul2009
moveave: 824
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Monthly trends in prosecutions

The decrease from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in July 2009 was for "Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major", accounting for 69.1 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" ( 13%), "Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (12.2%). See Figure 2.

progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FO
percentage: 13%  (12.98%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Weapons-Operation Triggerlock
percentage: 69%  (69.13%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 18%  (17.9%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 18%  (17.9%) progcatlabel: Other
percentage: 18%  (17.9%)
PIE3D chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2: Specific types of prosecutions

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In July 2009, 115 defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in July the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 involving the "Firearms; Unlawful acts". This was the lead charge for 42.6 percent of all magistrate filings in July.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy" (27%), "21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" (6.1%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

In July 2009, 617 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during July there were an additional 83 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during July.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during July 2009referred by the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 419 1 1 1 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A 66 2 2 3 More
18 USC 924 - Firearms; Penalties 31 3 4 2 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 28 4 3 4 More
26 USC 5861 - Tax on Making Firearms - Prohibited acts 14 5 6 5 More
18 USC 1951 - Hobbs Act 10 6 5 6 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 4 7 7 7 More
18 USC 1958 - Interstate commerce facilities - murder for hire 4 7 25 20 More
18 USC 2113 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes 4 7 11 24 More
18 USC 2119 - Carjacking 4 7 11 12 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Firearms; Unlawful acts" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 922) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Firearms; Unlawful acts" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 922) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

  • Ranked 3rd was "Firearms; Penalties" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 924. "Firearms; Penalties" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 924 was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 300 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1958 that involves " Interstate commerce facilities - murder for hire ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—133.3 percent—was registered for prosecutions under " Bank robbery and incidental crimes " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2113 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 46.2 percent—was Bank robbery and incidental crimes (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2113 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions— 49.5 percent—was for filings where the lead charge was " Tax on Making Firearms - Prohibited acts " (Title 26 U.S.C Section 5861 ).

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In July 2009 the Justice Department said the government brought 281.2 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
La, M 2,355 15 1 60 61 More
Tenn, W 2,346 30 2 8 30 More
Montana 1,267 10 3 59 46 More
Wyoming 1,170 5 4 40 67 More
Tenn, E 1,132 23 5 15 8 More
N Car, E 1,080 31 6 5 1 More
N Car, M 953 21 7 7 23 More
Okla, N 861 7 8 32 51 More
Ind, N 858 18 9 14 39 More
Ga, S 851 10 10 33 40 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts (per ten million people)

  • The Middle District of Louisiana (Baton Rouge)—with 2355 prosecutions as compared with 281.2 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States—was the most active during July 2009.

  • The Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) ranked 2nd. The Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) was ranked 8 a year ago.

  • District of Montana is now ranking 3rd.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Northern District of Indiana (South Bend), now ranked 9th , and Eastern District of Tennessee (Knoxville) at 5th In the same order, these districts ranked 14th and 15th one year ago and 39th and 8th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago— 92.9 percent—was Southern District of Georgia (Savannah). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 101.8 percent—was Northern District of Indiana (South Bend).

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions— 40 percent—was Wyoming .  But over the past five years, Eastern District of North Carolina (Raleigh) showed the largest drop— 10 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during July 2009 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank  
Greer, J. Ronnie Tenn, E 10 1 More
Brady, James J. La, M 9 2 More
Donald, Bernice B. Tenn, W 9 2 More
McCalla, Jon Phipps Tenn, W 9 2 More
Lawson, Hugh Ga, M 8 5 More
Lozano, Rodolfo Ind, N 8 5 More
Boyle, Terrence William N Car, E 8 5 More
Miller, Robert Lowell Jr. Ind, N 6 8 More
Tyson, Ralph E. La, M 6 8 More
Jackson, Carol E. Mo, E 6 8 More
Conrad, Robert James Jr. N Car, W 6 8 More
Jack, Janis Graham Texas, S 6 8 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 8 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capita, while the remaining 4 judges were from other districts. (Because of ties, there were a total of 12 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)

  • Judge J. Ronnie Greer in the Eastern District of Tennessee (Knoxville) ranked 1st with 10 defendants in cases.

  • Judges James J. Brady in the Middle District of Louisiana (Baton Rouge), Bernice B. Donald in the Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) and Jon Phipps McCalla in the Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) ranked 2nd with 9 defendants in cases.

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2009, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page