Immigration Prosecutions for October 2005
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during October 2005 the government reported filing 3098 new immigration prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 30% over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with immigration -related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)
When monthly 2005 prosecutions are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the filings were up (9.2 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that the prosecutions are up 190 percent from levels reported five years ago.
The substantial growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in immigration prosecutions is 46.4 percent instead of 190 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.
The broad pattern of increase in immigration prosecutions over the past five years is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of immigration prosecutions recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.
Virtually all federal criminal prosecutions for immigration offenses in October 2005 (98 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting most immigration criminal investigations under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.
Lead Charge in Immigration Prosecutions
US Magistrate Courts
In October 2005, 57 percent of immigration cases took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in October the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 65.9 percent of all magistrate filings in October.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (24.9%), "08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" (5.2%).
US District Courts
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecution of immigration matters filed in U.S. District court during October 2005.
Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago 08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 864 1 1 1 08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 245 2 2 2 08 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place, etc. 76 3 3 3 18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and 51 4 4 4 18 USC 1028 - Fraud and related activity - id documents 19 5 9 8 18 USC 0911 - False personification - Citizen of the US 18 6 6 5 18 USC 1543 - Forgery or false use of passport 18 6 7 10 18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements generally 12 8 5 9 18 USC 1542 - False statement in application and use of passport 10 9 8 7 18 USC 0371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 5 10 10 6
Table 2: Top 10 charges filed
"Reentry of deported alien" (8 U.S.C Section 1326 ) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. This statute was also ranked 1st a year ago as well as five years ago.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 . This statute was also ranked 2nd a year ago as well as five years ago.
Ranked 3rd was "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc." under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 . This statute was also ranked 3rd a year ago as well as five years ago.
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 49 percent—compared to one year ago was 18 U.S.C Section 1028 that involves "Fraud and related activity - id documents ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—475 percent—was registered for prosecutions under "Forgery or false use of passport " (18 U.S.C Section 1543).
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 56.3 percent—was Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US (18 U.S.C Section 371 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 67.2 %—when compared with five years ago.
Immigration Prosecutions by Judicial District
Understandably, there is great variation in number of immigration prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts. The ten districts registering the largest number of prosecutions last month are shown in Table 3.
Southern District of Texas (Houston)—with 308 prosecutions—was the most active during October 2005. The district's position last year was 1st. Five years ago, the district's position was 3.
Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked second. This marked a rise from Texas West 's 4thplace ranking just one year ago. Five years ago, the district's position was 2.
Arizona is now ranking third, the same as a year ago, when it ranked 3rd. Five years ago, the district's position was 4.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Oregon, now ranked 10th . This district ranked 15th one year ago and 11th five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in immigration prosecutions compared to one year ago— 67.4 percent—was Middle District of Florida (Tampa). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 198 percent—was Southern District of Texas (Houston).
In the last year, the judicial district court recording the largest drop in immigration prosecutions— 60.1 percent—was Central District of California (Los Angeles). But over the past five years, Eastern District of California (Sacramento) showed the largest drop— 31.2 percent.
Top Ranked District Judges
For the entire nation, the ten district court judges recorded with the largest number of new federal criminal immigration cases during October 2005 are shown in Table 4.
Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 70 1 3 - Kazen, George P. Texas, S 60 2 1 2 Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 60 2 65 - Crane, Randy Texas, S 40 4 7 - Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 39 5 8 19 Hanen, Andrew S. Texas, S 39 5 6 - Tagle, Hilda G. Texas, S 36 7 5 10 Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 30 8 14 272 Briones, David Texas, W 26 9 10 5 Hansen, Curtis LeRoy N Mexico 22 10 48 36 Junell, Robert A. Texas, W 22 10 20 -
Table 4: Top 10 judges
All 11 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration filings . (Because of ties, there were a total of 11 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)
Judge Robert C. Brack in the New Mexico ranked 1st with 70 defendants in new immigration cases. Judge Brack also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 3rd).
Judge George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd with 60 defendants in new immigration cases. Judge Kazen also appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1st) and five years ago (rank 2nd).
Judge Micaela Alvarez in Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 60 new immigration cases.
