Immigration Prosecutions for March 2014
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during March 2014 the government reported 6512 new immigration prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 7.9 percent over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with immigration-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).
When monthly 2014 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was down (-26.1%). Prosecutions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are down 16.6 percent from levels reported in 2009.
The decrease from the levels five years ago in immigration prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of immigration prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Virtually all federal criminal prosecutions for immigration offenses in March 2014 (100 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting most immigration criminal investigations under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.
Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In March 2014, 5609 defendants in immigration cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.
In the magistrate courts in March the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 49.5 percent of all magistrate filings in March.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (45.6%).
Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts
In March 2014, 903 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during March there were an additional 1050 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during March.
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of immigration matters filed in U.S. District Court during March 2014.
Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago 08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,584 1 1 1 More 08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 198 2 2 2 More 18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 66 3 3 4 More 08 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 28 4 5 3 More 18 USC 1544 - Misuse of passport 28 4 4 10 More 18 USC 1542 - False statement in application and use of passport 9 6 7 7 More 42 USC 408 - Fed Old Age, Survivors & Disab Insur -Penalties 9 6 11 13 More 18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 6 8 11 5 More 18 USC 1028A - Aggravated Identity Theft 5 9 29 18 More 18 USC 911 - False personification - Citizen of the US 3 10 6 6 More 18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 3 10 10 14 More 18 USC 1425 - Procurement of citizenship or naturalization unlaw 3 10 16 18 More Table 2. Top Charges Filed
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.
Ranked 3rd was "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546. "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions — up 900 percent — compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1028 that involves " Aggravated Identity Theft ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase — 408.3 percent — was registered for prosecutions under " Misuse of passport " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1544 ).
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago — down 76.1 percent — was " False personification - Citizen of the US " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 911 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease — 79.2 % — when compared with five years ago.
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.
Judicial District Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago Texas, S 382 1 1 1 More Texas, W 369 2 2 2 More N Mexico 278 3 4 4 More Arizona 237 4 5 5 More Cal, S 192 5 3 3 More Mich, E 40 6 25 45 More Texas, N 36 7 8 17 More Fla, S 34 8 6 7 More Fla, M 27 9 11 11 More Virg, E 25 10 12 12 More Table 3. Top 10 Districts
The Southern District of Texas (Houston) — with 382 prosecutions — was the most active during March 2014. The Southern District of Texas (Houston) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 for most frequent use five years ago.
The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 for most frequent use five years ago.
District of New Mexico is now ranking 3rd. The District of New Mexico was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 for most frequent use five years ago.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Middle District of Florida (Tampa), now ranked 9th , and Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria) at 10th In the same order, these districts ranked 11th and 12th one year ago and 11th and 12th five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in immigration prosecutions compared to one year ago — 161.4 percent — was Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit). This was the same district that had the largest increase — 379.2 percent — when compared with five years ago.
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in immigration prosecutions — 36.8 percent — was Southern District of California (San Diego). This was the same district that had the largest increase — 39.9 percent — when compared with five years ago.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases of this type during March 2014 are shown in Table 4.
Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 134 1 1 1 More Moses, Alia Texas, W 121 2 2 - More Gonzales, Kenneth John N Mexico 91 3 - - More Junell, Robert A. Texas, W 55 4 7 15 More Hanen, Andrew S. Texas, S 53 5 4 7 More Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 52 6 3 6 More Crane, Randy Texas, S 52 6 5 5 More Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 51 8 6 2 More Guaderrama, David C. Texas, W 32 9 13 - More Jorgenson, Cindy K. Arizona 29 10 26 33 More Table 4. Top Ten Judges
All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration filings.
Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 1st with 134 defendants in immigration cases. Judge Brack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 1).
Judge Alia Moses in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd with 121 defendants in immigration cases. Judge Moses also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 2).
Judge Kenneth John Gonzales in the District of New Mexico ranked 3rd with 91 defendants in immigration cases.
Report Generated: May 13, 2014
