Immigration Convictions for March 2007

Number Latest Month 3,028
Percent Change from previous month 5.4
Percent Change from 1 year ago -8.8
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 136.2
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 46.1

Table 1: Criminal Immigration Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during March 2007 the government reported 3028 new immigration convictions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 5.4% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted for immigration-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2007 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of convictions was down (-8.8 percent). Convictions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are up 136.2 percent from levels reported in 2002.

The substantial growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in immigration convictions is 46.1 percent instead of 136.2 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 1,399 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 1,228 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 1,401 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 1,142 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 1,167 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 1,111 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 1,192 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 1,191 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,165 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,135 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 1,016 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 1,079 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,157 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 1,062 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 1,191 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 1,097 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 1,295 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 1,056 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 1,332 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 1,383 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 1,327 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 1,538 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 1,141 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 1,364 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 1,651 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 1,489 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 1,744 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 1,537 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 1,508 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 1,675 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 1,466 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 1,421 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 1,862 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 1,428 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 1,502 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 2,806 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 2,706 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 2,113 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 2,878 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 3,153 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 3,805 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 2,909 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 2,521 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 3,574 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 2,152 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 2,162 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 1,925 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 2,487 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 2,116 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 2,233 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 2,631 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 2,398 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 3,270 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 3,510 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 3,250 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 3,696 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 3,500 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 3,143 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 2,655 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 2,568 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 2,895 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 2,780 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 3,146 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 2,589 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 2,824 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 3,180 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 2,896 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 3,411 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 3,073 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 2,559 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 2,354 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 2,158 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 2,709 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 2,873 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 3,028 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 1241.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 1206.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 1200.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 1161.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 1160.1666667 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 1135 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1129.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1123.8333333 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1102.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1106.6666667 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 1100.3333333 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 1146.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 1143 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 1172.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 1225.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 1248.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 1321.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 1296.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 1347.5 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 1400.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 1418.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 1487.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 1487.6666667 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 1548.8333333 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 1600.6666667 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 1569.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 1558.5 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 1578.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 1560 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 1559 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 1747.5 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 1954.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 2069.5 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 2238.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 2526.3333333 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 2910.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 2927.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 2896.5 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 3140 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 3019 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 2853.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 2540.5 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 2470.1666667 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 2402.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 2179.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 2259 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 2298.3333333 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 2522.5 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 2693 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 2882 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 3125.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 3270.6666667 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 3394.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 3292.3333333 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 3135.3333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 3076.1666667 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 2923.5 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 2864.5 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 2772.1666667 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 2800.3333333 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 2902.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 2902.5 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 3007.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 2995.5 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 2990.5 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 2912.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 2741.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 2710.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 2621 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 2613.5
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Immigration Convictions over the last five years

The increase from the levels five years ago in immigration convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of immigration convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.

agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.33%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.33%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.33%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.33%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.33%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 0%  (0.43%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 0%  (0.43%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 0%  (0.43%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 0%  (0.43%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 0%  (0.43%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 0%  (0.46%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 0%  (0.46%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 0%  (0.46%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 0%  (0.46%) agenrevgrp: FBI
percentage: 0%  (0.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 99%  (98.68%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 0%  (0.1%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 0%  (0.1%) agenrevgrp: DEA
percentage: 0%  (0.1%)
PIE3D chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 2: Convictions by Investigative Agency

Virtually all federal criminal convictions for immigration offenses in March 2007 (99 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting most immigration criminal  investigations under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.

Immigration Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In March 2007, 47 percent of immigration cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in March the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 74.3 percent of all magistrate convictions in March.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (18.2%).

Immigration Convictions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of immigration matters filed in U.S. District Court during March 2007.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,050 1 1 1 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 294 2 2 2 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 83 3 3 3 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 56 4 4 4 More
18 USC 911 - False personification - Citizen of the US 23 5 5 5 More
18 USC 1028 - Fraud and related activity - id documents 13 6 9 7 More
18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 11 7 7 6 More
18 USC 1542 - False statement in application and use of passport 9 8 8 8 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 8 9 13 9 More
18 USC 1015 - Fraud - Nat'zation, citizenship, alien registry 6 10 26 - More
18 USC 1203 - Kidnapping - Hostage taking 6 10 18 - More

Table 2: Top charges for convictions

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. This statute was also ranked 1st a year ago as well as five years ago.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. This statute was also ranked 2nd a year ago as well as five years ago.

  • Ranked 3rd was "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc." under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325. This statute was also ranked 3rd a year ago as well as five years ago.

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions—up 550 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1015 that involves " Fraud - Nat'zation, citizenship, alien registry ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—92.8 percent—was registered for convictions under " Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 50.1 percent—was Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 50.9 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of convictions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.


Judicial District Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Texas, S 328 1 1 1 More
Texas, W 267 2 2 3 More
Arizona 200 3 4 4 More
N Mexico 166 4 3 5 More
Cal, S 146 5 5 2 More
Cal, C 39 6 6 6 More
Puer Rico 22 7 15 20 More
Fla, S 21 8 7 9 More
Texas, N 18 9 9 13 More
Wash, E 17 10 18 19 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts

  • Southern District of Texas (Houston)—with 328 convictions—was the most active during March 2007. This district was also ranked 1st a year ago as well as five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd. This district was also ranked 2nd a year ago. Five years ago, the district's position was 3.

  • Arizona is now ranking 3rd. This district was ranked 4th a year ago as well as five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Puerto Rico , now ranked 7th , and Eastern District of Washington (Spokane) at 10th In the same order, these districts ranked 15th and 18th one year ago and 20th and 19th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in immigration convictions compared to one year ago— 71.9 percent—was Eastern District of Washington (Spokane). Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 88.6 percent—was Southern District of Texas (Houston).

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in immigration convictions— 39.3 percent—was Central District of California (Los Angeles).  This was the same district that had the largest increase— 11 %—when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases resulting in convictions of this type during March 2007 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 58 1 2 - More
Briones, David Texas, W 55 2 8 1 More
Hanen, Andrew S. Texas, S 53 3 4 - More
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 46 4 1 - More
Tagle, Hilda G. Texas, S 45 5 5 5 More
Martinez, Philip Ray Texas, W 45 5 6 274 More
Montalvo, Frank Texas, W 44 7 9 274 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 34 8 11 - More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 33 9 10 10 More
Kazen, George P. Texas, S 33 9 3 4 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration convictions .

  • Judge Micaela Alvarez in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 1st with 58 convicted in immigration convictions. Judge Alvarezalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 2nd).

  • Judge David Briones in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd with 55 convicted in immigration convictions. Judge Briones also appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 8th) and five years ago (rank 1st).

  • Judge Andrew S. Hanen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 53 new immigration convictions. Judge Hanen also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 4th).

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2007, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page