Immigration Prosecutions for March 2007

Number Latest Month 3,646
Percent Change from previous month 17.2
Percent Change from 1 year ago -0.3
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) 146.2
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) 17.4

Table 1: Criminal Immigration Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during March 2007 the government reported 3646 new immigration prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 17.2% over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with immigration-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)

When monthly 2007 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was only slightlydown (-0.3 percent). Prosecutions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are up 146.2 percent from levels reported in 2002.

The substantial growth in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in immigration prosecutions is 17.4 percent instead of 146.2 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

FYMONDT: Jan2001
_FREQ_: 1,261 FYMONDT: Feb2001
_FREQ_: 1,259 FYMONDT: Mar2001
_FREQ_: 1,591 FYMONDT: Apr2001
_FREQ_: 1,431 FYMONDT: May2001
_FREQ_: 1,534 FYMONDT: Jun2001
_FREQ_: 1,375 FYMONDT: Jul2001
_FREQ_: 1,426 FYMONDT: Aug2001
_FREQ_: 1,473 FYMONDT: Sep2001
_FREQ_: 1,257 FYMONDT: Oct2001
_FREQ_: 1,343 FYMONDT: Nov2001
_FREQ_: 1,098 FYMONDT: Dec2001
_FREQ_: 1,056 FYMONDT: Jan2002
_FREQ_: 1,053 FYMONDT: Feb2002
_FREQ_: 1,239 FYMONDT: Mar2002
_FREQ_: 1,396 FYMONDT: Apr2002
_FREQ_: 1,672 FYMONDT: May2002
_FREQ_: 1,687 FYMONDT: Jun2002
_FREQ_: 1,530 FYMONDT: Jul2002
_FREQ_: 1,590 FYMONDT: Aug2002
_FREQ_: 1,746 FYMONDT: Sep2002
_FREQ_: 1,603 FYMONDT: Oct2002
_FREQ_: 1,777 FYMONDT: Nov2002
_FREQ_: 1,606 FYMONDT: Dec2002
_FREQ_: 1,611 FYMONDT: Jan2003
_FREQ_: 1,595 FYMONDT: Feb2003
_FREQ_: 1,803 FYMONDT: Mar2003
_FREQ_: 1,953 FYMONDT: Apr2003
_FREQ_: 1,657 FYMONDT: May2003
_FREQ_: 1,851 FYMONDT: Jun2003
_FREQ_: 1,631 FYMONDT: Jul2003
_FREQ_: 1,800 FYMONDT: Aug2003
_FREQ_: 1,705 FYMONDT: Sep2003
_FREQ_: 1,684 FYMONDT: Oct2003
_FREQ_: 1,834 FYMONDT: Nov2003
_FREQ_: 1,631 FYMONDT: Dec2003
_FREQ_: 3,230 FYMONDT: Jan2004
_FREQ_: 2,868 FYMONDT: Feb2004
_FREQ_: 2,541 FYMONDT: Mar2004
_FREQ_: 3,535 FYMONDT: Apr2004
_FREQ_: 3,997 FYMONDT: May2004
_FREQ_: 3,786 FYMONDT: Jun2004
_FREQ_: 3,436 FYMONDT: Jul2004
_FREQ_: 3,151 FYMONDT: Aug2004
_FREQ_: 4,041 FYMONDT: Sep2004
_FREQ_: 3,804 FYMONDT: Oct2004
_FREQ_: 2,410 FYMONDT: Nov2004
_FREQ_: 2,453 FYMONDT: Dec2004
_FREQ_: 2,601 FYMONDT: Jan2005
_FREQ_: 2,123 FYMONDT: Feb2005
_FREQ_: 2,432 FYMONDT: Mar2005
_FREQ_: 3,100 FYMONDT: Apr2005
_FREQ_: 3,029 FYMONDT: May2005
_FREQ_: 3,647 FYMONDT: Jun2005
_FREQ_: 4,016 FYMONDT: Jul2005
_FREQ_: 3,649 FYMONDT: Aug2005
_FREQ_: 3,698 FYMONDT: Sep2005
_FREQ_: 4,425 FYMONDT: Oct2005
_FREQ_: 3,121 FYMONDT: Nov2005
_FREQ_: 2,786 FYMONDT: Dec2005
_FREQ_: 2,600 FYMONDT: Jan2006
_FREQ_: 3,023 FYMONDT: Feb2006
_FREQ_: 2,908 FYMONDT: Mar2006
_FREQ_: 3,305 FYMONDT: Apr2006
_FREQ_: 2,755 FYMONDT: May2006
_FREQ_: 3,184 FYMONDT: Jun2006
_FREQ_: 3,346 FYMONDT: Jul2006
_FREQ_: 3,023 FYMONDT: Aug2006
_FREQ_: 3,148 FYMONDT: Sep2006
_FREQ_: 2,845 FYMONDT: Oct2006
_FREQ_: 2,723 FYMONDT: Nov2006
_FREQ_: 2,639 FYMONDT: Dec2006
_FREQ_: 2,366 FYMONDT: Jan2007
_FREQ_: 3,203 FYMONDT: Feb2007
_FREQ_: 3,111 FYMONDT: Mar2007
_FREQ_: 3,646 FYMONDT: Jun2001
moveave: 1408.5 FYMONDT: Jul2001
moveave: 1436 FYMONDT: Aug2001
moveave: 1471.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2001
moveave: 1416 FYMONDT: Oct2001
moveave: 1401.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2001
moveave: 1328.6666667 FYMONDT: Dec2001
moveave: 1275.5 FYMONDT: Jan2002
moveave: 1213.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2002
moveave: 1174.3333333 FYMONDT: Mar2002
moveave: 1197.5 FYMONDT: Apr2002
moveave: 1252.3333333 FYMONDT: May2002
moveave: 1350.5 FYMONDT: Jun2002
moveave: 1429.5 FYMONDT: Jul2002
moveave: 1519 FYMONDT: Aug2002
moveave: 1603.5 FYMONDT: Sep2002
moveave: 1638 FYMONDT: Oct2002
moveave: 1655.5 FYMONDT: Nov2002
moveave: 1642 FYMONDT: Dec2002
moveave: 1655.5 FYMONDT: Jan2003
moveave: 1656.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2003
moveave: 1665.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2003
moveave: 1724.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2003
moveave: 1704.1666667 FYMONDT: May2003
moveave: 1745 FYMONDT: Jun2003
moveave: 1748.3333333 FYMONDT: Jul2003
moveave: 1782.5 FYMONDT: Aug2003
moveave: 1766.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2003
moveave: 1721.3333333 FYMONDT: Oct2003
moveave: 1750.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2003
moveave: 1714.1666667 FYMONDT: Dec2003
moveave: 1980.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2004
moveave: 2158.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2004
moveave: 2298 FYMONDT: Mar2004
moveave: 2606.5 FYMONDT: Apr2004
moveave: 2967 FYMONDT: May2004
moveave: 3326.1666667 FYMONDT: Jun2004
moveave: 3360.5 FYMONDT: Jul2004
moveave: 3407.6666667 FYMONDT: Aug2004
moveave: 3657.6666667 FYMONDT: Sep2004
moveave: 3702.5 FYMONDT: Oct2004
moveave: 3438 FYMONDT: Nov2004
moveave: 3215.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2004
moveave: 3076.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2005
moveave: 2905.3333333 FYMONDT: Feb2005
moveave: 2637.1666667 FYMONDT: Mar2005
moveave: 2519.8333333 FYMONDT: Apr2005
moveave: 2623 FYMONDT: May2005
moveave: 2822 FYMONDT: Jun2005
moveave: 3057.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2005
moveave: 3312.1666667 FYMONDT: Aug2005
moveave: 3523.1666667 FYMONDT: Sep2005
moveave: 3744 FYMONDT: Oct2005
moveave: 3759.3333333 FYMONDT: Nov2005
moveave: 3615.8333333 FYMONDT: Dec2005
moveave: 3379.8333333 FYMONDT: Jan2006
moveave: 3275.5 FYMONDT: Feb2006
moveave: 3143.8333333 FYMONDT: Mar2006
moveave: 2957.1666667 FYMONDT: Apr2006
moveave: 2896.1666667 FYMONDT: May2006
moveave: 2962.5 FYMONDT: Jun2006
moveave: 3086.8333333 FYMONDT: Jul2006
moveave: 3086.8333333 FYMONDT: Aug2006
moveave: 3126.8333333 FYMONDT: Sep2006
moveave: 3050.1666667 FYMONDT: Oct2006
moveave: 3044.8333333 FYMONDT: Nov2006
moveave: 2954 FYMONDT: Dec2006
moveave: 2790.6666667 FYMONDT: Jan2007
moveave: 2820.6666667 FYMONDT: Feb2007
moveave: 2814.5 FYMONDT: Mar2007
moveave: 2948
Plot of moveave * FYMONDT

Figure 1: Criminal Immigration Prosecutions over the last five years

The increase from the levels five years ago in immigration prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of immigration prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.

agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.22%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.22%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.22%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.22%) agenrevgrp: State Dep
percentage: 0%  (0.22%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 1%  (0.96%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 1%  (0.96%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 1%  (0.96%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 1%  (0.96%) agenrevgrp: Other
percentage: 1%  (0.96%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 0%  (0.19%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 0%  (0.19%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 0%  (0.19%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 0%  (0.19%) agenrevgrp: Local
percentage: 0%  (0.19%) agenrevgrp: Justice Other
percentage: 0%  (0.16%) agenrevgrp: Justice Other
percentage: 0%  (0.16%) agenrevgrp: Justice Other
percentage: 0%  (0.16%) agenrevgrp: Justice Other
percentage: 0%  (0.16%) agenrevgrp: Justice Other
percentage: 0%  (0.16%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%) agenrevgrp: DHS
percentage: 98%  (98.46%)
PIE3D chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 2: Prosecutions by Investigative Agency

Virtually all federal criminal prosecutions for immigration offenses in March 2007 (98 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting most immigration criminal  investigations under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.

Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In March 2007, 75 percent of immigration cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In the magistrate courts in March the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 49.2 percent of all magistrate filings in March.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (36.6%), "8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" (8.6%).

Immigration Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of immigration matters filed in U.S. District Court during March 2007.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 504 1 1 1 More
8 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 217 2 2 2 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 48 3 4 4 More
8 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 40 4 3 3 More
18 USC 1542 - False statement in application and use of passport 18 5 8 8 More
18 USC 1543 - Forgery or false use of passport 12 6 6 9 More
18 USC 1028 - Fraud and related activity - id documents 11 7 5 7 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 8 8 13 13 More
18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 8 8 9 5 More
18 USC 911 - False personification - Citizen of the US 7 10 7 6 More

Table 2: Top charges filed

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. This statute was also ranked 1st a year ago as well as five years ago.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. This statute was also ranked 2nd a year ago as well as five years ago.

  • Ranked 3rd was "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546. This statute was ranked 4th a year ago, while it was the 4th most frequently invoked 5 years ago.

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions—up 106.7 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 that involves " Firearms; Unlawful acts ". This was the same statute that had the largest increase—138.5 %—when compared with five years ago.

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago—down 55.2 percent—was Forgery or false use of passport (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1543 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions— 71.9 percent—was for filings where the lead charge was " Fraud/false statements or entries generally " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1001 ).

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.


Judicial District Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Texas, S 224 1 1 1 More
Texas, W 102 2 2 4 More
Cal, S 84 3 5 3 More
Fla, S 46 4 6 8 More
N Mexico 41 5 4 5 More
Arizona 35 6 3 2 More
Fla, M 23 7 8 14 More
Colorado 22 8 17 21 More
Cal, N 17 9 18 19 More
Puer Rico 16 10 15 23 More

Table 3: Top 10 districts

  • Southern District of Texas (Houston)—with 224 prosecutions—was the most active during March 2007. This district was also ranked 1st a year ago as well as five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd. This district was also ranked 2nd a year ago. Five years ago, the district's position was 4.

  • Southern District of California (San Diego) is now ranking 3rd. It moved up in its rankings from a year ago when it ranked 5th. Five years ago, the district's position was 3.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Puerto Rico , now ranked 10th , and Colorado at 8th In the same order, these districts ranked 15th and 17th one year ago and 23rd and 21st five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in immigration prosecutions compared to one year ago— 31.7 percent—was Colorado . Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 159.5 percent—was Puerto Rico .

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in immigration prosecutions— 34.4 percent—was Middle District of Florida (Tampa).  But over the past five years, Southern District of California (San Diego) showed the largest drop— 5.3 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases of this type during March 2007 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 39 1 1 - More
Lorenz, M. James Cal, S 11 2 31 35 More
Huff, Marilyn L. Cal, S 10 3 28 62 More
Miller, Jeffrey T. Cal, S 9 4 24 31 More
Sabraw, Dana Makoto Cal, S 8 5 31 - More
Miller, Walker David Colorado 8 5 105 89 More
Thompson, Gordon Jr. Cal, S 7 7 12 1 More
Moskowitz, Barry Ted Cal, S 5 8 25 22 More
Ungaro-Benages, Ursula Mancusi Fla, S 5 8 81 203 More
Winmill, B. Lynn Idaho 5 8 52 63 More
Bennett, Mark W. Iowa, N 5 8 105 53 More

Table 4: Top 10 judges

A total of 9 out of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration filings , while the remaining 2 judges were from other districts. (Because of ties, there were a total of 11 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 1st with 39 defendants in immigration cases. Judge Brackalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 1st).

  • Judge M. James Lorenz in the Southern District of California (San Diego) ranked 2nd with 11 defendants in immigration cases.

  • Judge Marilyn L. Huff in the Southern District of California (San Diego) ranked 3rd with 10 new immigration cases.

TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2007, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page