Immigration Convictions for February 2008
Table 1: Criminal Immigration Convictions
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during February 2008 the government reported 6583 new immigration convictions.
According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 96.3% over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted for immigration-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom
of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See Table 1)
When monthly 2008 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in
the previous year, the number of convictions was up (53.6 percent).
Convictions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago.
Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are up 182.8 percent from levels reported in 2003.
The substantial growth in
these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases
are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in
immigration convictions is 29.8 percent instead of 182.8 percent.
The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases
by the Justice Department.
Figure 1: Criminal Immigration Convictions over the last five years
The increase from the levels five years ago in immigration convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1
represent the number of immigration convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month
basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so
that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Figure 2: Convictions by Investigative Agency
Virtually all federal criminal convictions for immigration offenses in February 2008
(99 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol
agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting
most immigration criminal investigations
under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.
Immigration Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In February 2008, 70 percent of immigration cases for these matters took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious
misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses."
In the magistrate courts in February the most frequently cited lead charge was
Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge
for 91.2 percent of all magistrate convictions in February.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (7.5%).
Immigration Convictions in U.S. District Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of immigration matters
filed in U.S. District Court during February 2008.
Table 2: Top charges for convictions
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.
"Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was the 1 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324.
"Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was the 2 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..
Ranked 3rd was "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc." under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325.
"Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc." under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was the 3 most frequently invoked 5 years ago..
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest
increase in convictions—up 56.3 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 21 U.S.C Section 841
that involves " Drug Abuse Prevention + Control-Prohibited acts A
Compared to five years ago, the largest increase—115.4 percent—was registered for
convictions under " Fraud and related activity - id documents
" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1028 ).
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest
decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 15.9 percent—was
Fraud/false statements or entries generally
(Title 18 U.S.C Section 1001 ).
This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 73.6 %—when compared with five years ago.
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the
largest number of convictions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Top 10 districts
The Southern District of Texas (Houston)—with 438 convictions—was the most active during February 2008.
The Southern District of Texas (Houston) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.
The District of Arizona ranked 2nd.
The District of Arizona was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.
Southern District of California (San Diego) is now ranking 3rd.
The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were
Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria), now ranked
, and Western District of New York (Buffalo)
In the same order, these districts ranked 14th and 17th one year ago and 28th and 37th five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth
in immigration convictions compared to one year ago— 64.9 percent—was
Central District of California (Los Angeles).
Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 240.9 percent—was
Western District of New York (Buffalo).
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the
largest drop in immigration convictions— 27.8 percent—was
Eastern District of California (Sacramento).
This was the same district that had the largest increase— 54.4 %—when compared with five years ago.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases resulting in convictions of this type
during February 2008 are shown in Table 4.
All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration convictions .
Judge Hilda G. Tagle in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 1st with 76 convicted in immigration convictions.
Judge Tagle appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 4) and five years ago (rank 7).
Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 2nd with 75 convicted in immigration convictions.
Judge Brackalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago(ranked 2).
Judge George P. Kazen in the Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 3rd with 72 convicted in immigration convictions.
Judge Kazen appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 3) and five years ago (rank 6).