Immigration Convictions for February 2007
| 2,892 |
| 6.6 |
| -10.2 |
| 138.3 |
| 48.6 |
Table 1: Criminal Immigration Convictions
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during February 2007 the government reported 2892 new immigration convictions.
According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access
Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 6.6% over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted for immigration-related
offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom
of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (See
Table 1)
When monthly 2007 convictions are compared with those of the same period in
the previous year, the numbers were down (-10.2 percent).
Convictions over the past year are still much higher than they were five years ago.
Overall, the data show that the convictions are up 138.3
percent from levels reported in 2002.
The substantial growth in
these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases
are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall increase in
immigration convictions is 48.6 percent instead of 138.3 percent.
The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases
by the Justice Department.
Figure 1: Criminal Immigration Convictions over the last five years
The increase from the levels five years ago in immigration convictions is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1
represent the number of immigration convictions recorded on a month-to-month
basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so
that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average.
Figure 2: Convictions by Investigative Agency
Virtually all federal criminal convictions for immigration offenses in February 2007
(99 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol
agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting
most immigration criminal investigations
under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.
Lead Charge in Immigration Convictions
US Magistrate Courts
In February 2007, 47 percent of immigration cases took place in U.S. Magistrate Courts which handle less serious
misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses."
In the magistrate courts in February the most frequently cited lead charge was
Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving the "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge
for 80.3 percent of all magistrate convictions in February.
Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "8 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (10.5%).
US District Courts
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of immigration matters
filed in U.S. District Court during February 2007.
Table 2: Top charges for convictions
"Reentry of deported alien" (8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded
lead charge.
This statute was also ranked 1st a year ago as well as five years ago.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens"
under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324.
This statute was also ranked 2nd a year ago as well as five years ago.
Ranked 3rd was "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc." under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325.
This statute was also ranked 3rd a year ago as well as five years ago.
Figure 3: District Court vs.
Magistrate Court
Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest
increase in convictions—up 300 percent—compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1015
that involves " Fraud - Nat'zation, citizenship, alien registry
".
This was the same statute that had the largest increase—700 %—when compared with five years ago.
Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest
decline in convictions compared to one year ago—down 54.7 percent—was
Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.
(Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 ).
This was the same statute that had the largest decrease— 55.1 %—when compared with five years ago.
Immigration Convictions by Judicial District
Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the
largest number of convictions last month are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Top 10 districts
Southern District of Texas (Houston)—with 340 convictions—was the most active during February 2007.
This district was ranked 1st a year ago as well as five years ago.
Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd.
This marked a fall from Texas West's
2ndplace ranking just one year ago.
Five years ago, the district's position was 4.
New Mexico is now
ranking 3rd.
It moved down in its rankings from a year ago when it ranked 3rd.
Five years ago, the district's position was 5.
Recent entrants to the top 10 list were
Utah , now ranked
6th
, and Puerto Rico
at 9th.
In the same order, these districts ranked 13th and 15th
one year ago and 10th and 18th five years ago.
The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth
in immigration convictions compared to one year ago— 115.6 percent—was
Utah .
Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth— 133.1 percent—was
New Mexico .
In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the
largest drop in immigration convictions— 15.1 percent—was
Puerto Rico .
But over the past five years,
Southern District of California (San Diego)
showed the largest drop— 1.5 percent.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. For the entire nation, the judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases resulting in convictions
during February 2007 are shown in Table 4.
All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration convictions .
Judge Robert C. Brack in the
New Mexico
ranked 1st with 116 convicted in immigration convictions.
Judge Brackalso appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago
(ranked 3rd).
Judge Micaela Alvarez in the
Southern District of Texas (Houston)
ranked 2nd with 99 convicted in immigration convictions.
Judge Alvarez also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago
(ranked 1st).
Judge George P. Kazen in
Southern District of Texas (Houston)
ranked 3rd with 72 new immigration convictions.
Judge Kazen also appeared in the top ten rankings one year
(ranked 2nd)
and five years ago (rank 4th).